RE: [Zope-dev] Calling rendered objects from a product

2000-06-15 Thread Dr. Ross Lazarus
More than one way to skin that particular cat I'll warrant. here's one cut from a heavily used external method to render a zope dynamic page to a disk file. import Globals ... o = getattr(self,thingtorender) rendered_doc = o(client=o,REQUEST=REQUEST,globals=globals()) ...

[Zope-dev] Zope vs. .... missing features

2000-06-15 Thread Thomas Weholt
Hi, Have anybody compared Zope to Roxen? Midgard? Or similar products? I saw Roxen had document revision system, a thing I "reported missing" earlier in this list. It also had full support for XML 1.0 and XSLT 1.0 or at least that`s what they claimed. These two features should be stuffed into

Re: [Zope-dev] Logging for ZScheduler?

2000-06-15 Thread Shane Hathaway
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote: At 01:58 PM 6/15/00 +1000, Stuart 'Zen' Bishop wrote: Its not a problem with ZScheduler, it a problem that no one has written a plug-in logging system that is good enough for what you are trying to do. The existing zLOG API is fine (well - it could be better), but

Re: [Zope-dev] Logging for ZScheduler?

2000-06-15 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 12:42 PM 6/15/00 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote: Agreed; I see this as by far the best approach. It's a tried and true pattern. Not only that, but it gives you extremely fine-grained control over what you do and don't log. And, if the other events like adds and deletes on folders are in

RE: [Zope-dev] Logging for ZScheduler?

2000-06-15 Thread Loren Stafford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stuart 'Zen' Bishop Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 20:58 To: Loren Stafford On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Loren Stafford wrote: I need some advise for designing a flexible system for logging the

RE: [Zope-dev] Logging for ZScheduler?

2000-06-15 Thread Loren Stafford
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Phillip J. Eby Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 21:21 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Loren Stafford At 01:58 PM 6/15/00 +1000, Stuart 'Zen' Bishop wrote: Its not a problem with ZScheduler, it a problem that

RE: [Zope-dev] Logging for ZScheduler?

2000-06-15 Thread Stuart 'Zen' Bishop
On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Loren Stafford wrote: It would be a good idea if there was a field in the ZEvent that defined the subsystem used in the zLOG call. I didn't follow your point here. By "subsytem" do you mean which logger in the loggers tuple? Then do you mean that different ZEvents

RE: [Zope-dev] Observable and ZPatterns (was Logging for ZScheduler?)

2000-06-15 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 01:40 PM 6/15/00 -0700, Loren Stafford wrote: Where is Observer-Observable in the development plan? ZPatterns 0.4? -- Loren No. 0.4 is targeted for 2.1.6 compatibility, and Observable will require Zope 2.2's new Traverse features. Also, 0.4 is due out tomorrow and I'm way behind on

Re: [Zope-dev] Logging for ZScheduler?

2000-06-15 Thread Kevin Dangoor
- Original Message - From: "Loren Stafford" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Phillip J. Eby" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Loren Stafford" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: "zope-dev" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 4:40 PM Subject: RE: [Zope-dev] Logging for ZScheduler? Cool! Then

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope vs. .... missing features

2000-06-15 Thread Martijn Faassen
Thomas Weholt wrote: Have anybody compared Zope to Roxen? Midgard? Or similar products? I saw Roxen had document revision system, a thing I "reported missing" earlier in this list. While Zope may not have that, it does have versions and undo. More version control facilities would indeed be

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope ...2.1.7 update - patches for MailHost

2000-06-15 Thread Adam Karpierz
Patches for MailHost product for Zope 2.1.7 begin 666 __init__.py.patch M*BHJ(%]?:6YI=%]?+G!Y+F]R9PEFD@07!R(#(Q(#$P.C$Q.C$Q(#(P,# * M+2TM(%]?:6YI=%]?+G!Y"49R:2!*=6X@,38@,#,Z-#DZ,#4@,C P, HJ*BHJ M*BHJ*BHJ*BHJ*BH**BHJ(#$P,2PQ,#4@*BHJ*@H@(" @(" @(" @*0H@(" @ M(" I"B @"BT@("