More than one way to skin that particular cat I'll warrant.
here's one cut from a heavily used external method to render a zope
dynamic page to a disk file.
import Globals
...
o = getattr(self,thingtorender)
rendered_doc = o(client=o,REQUEST=REQUEST,globals=globals())
...
Hi,
Have anybody compared Zope to Roxen? Midgard? Or similar products? I saw
Roxen had document revision system, a thing I "reported missing" earlier in
this list. It also had full support for XML 1.0 and XSLT 1.0 or at least
that`s what they claimed. These two features should be stuffed into
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
At 01:58 PM 6/15/00 +1000, Stuart 'Zen' Bishop wrote:
Its not a problem with ZScheduler, it a problem that no one has written
a plug-in logging system that is good enough for what you are trying to
do. The existing zLOG API is fine (well - it could be better), but
At 12:42 PM 6/15/00 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Agreed; I see this as by far the best approach. It's a tried and true
pattern.
Not only that, but it gives you extremely fine-grained control over what
you do and don't log. And, if the other events like adds and deletes on
folders are in
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of Stuart 'Zen' Bishop
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 20:58
To: Loren Stafford
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Loren Stafford wrote:
I need some advise for designing a flexible system for logging the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of Phillip J. Eby
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 21:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Loren Stafford
At 01:58 PM 6/15/00 +1000, Stuart 'Zen' Bishop wrote:
Its not a problem with ZScheduler, it a problem that
On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Loren Stafford wrote:
It would be a good idea if there was a field in the ZEvent that defined
the subsystem used in the zLOG call.
I didn't follow your point here. By "subsytem" do you mean which logger in
the loggers tuple? Then do you mean that different ZEvents
At 01:40 PM 6/15/00 -0700, Loren Stafford wrote:
Where is Observer-Observable in the development plan? ZPatterns 0.4?
-- Loren
No. 0.4 is targeted for 2.1.6 compatibility, and Observable will require
Zope 2.2's new Traverse features. Also, 0.4 is due out tomorrow and I'm
way behind on
- Original Message -
From: "Loren Stafford" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Phillip J. Eby" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Loren
Stafford" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "zope-dev" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 4:40 PM
Subject: RE: [Zope-dev] Logging for ZScheduler?
Cool! Then
Thomas Weholt wrote:
Have anybody compared Zope to Roxen? Midgard? Or similar products? I saw
Roxen had document revision system, a thing I "reported missing" earlier in
this list.
While Zope may not have that, it does have versions and undo. More
version control facilities would indeed be
Patches for MailHost product for Zope 2.1.7
begin 666 __init__.py.patch
M*BHJ(%]?:6YI=%]?+G!Y+F]R9PEFD@07!R(#(Q(#$P.C$Q.C$Q(#(P,# *
M+2TM(%]?:6YI=%]?+G!Y"49R:2!*=6X@,38@,#,Z-#DZ,#4@,C P, HJ*BHJ
M*BHJ*BHJ*BHJ*BH**BHJ(#$P,2PQ,#4@*BHJ*@H@(" @(" @(" @*0H@(" @
M(" I"B @"BT@("
11 matches
Mail list logo