On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
AFAIK this is the right behavior and not a bug. you ask for the
StructureText document to be rendered and you inform the rendering
machinery that the document is in structured text. the rendering process
will output HTML.
i think what you want is
Hello everyone,
Im trying to do something like this:
when a user access:
http://www.mysite.com/somefolder
i wish to return:
http://www.mysite.com/onefolder/anotherfolder/somefolder
but do this in a transparent form, without redirecting the user. I guess, by
calling the somefolder in the context
Hello Antonio,
Actually, the problem can not be solved by the Virtual Host Product, for what
i know. Let me explain the situation:
Im trying to create something like a Template Folder, that contains some
folders with images, some DTML Methods that create menus and the like, and a
Content
Hi Paul! Hi list!
In the last couple of weeks I have really looked forward for the CVS to be
finally opened. Not that I would be the first to be accepted as a
contributor (my Python is still lousy, as Stephan Richter could tell you
...), but I read things from ZC like We are too busy to get
This is a good point, and one that we need to settle on pretty quickly.
The language is an artifact from the Mozilla contributor form, which
served as the starting point for this. We intended to follow it, but
with the advent of the joint ownership idea (which came late in the
process),
Sidnei da Silva writes:
Im trying to do something like this:
when a user access:
http://www.mysite.com/somefolder
i wish to return:
http://www.mysite.com/onefolder/anotherfolder/somefolder
but do this in a transparent form, without redirecting the user. I guess, by
Seems to call for
R. David Murray writes:
...
So, the many small contributions that make a bazaar software project
tend rapidly toward high quality, which is one of the things I got
the impression you are trying to achieve by opening up the CVS
repository, may not materialize under this Agreement. We'll
I'll reply in more depth later (on the way out for my b-day dinner), but
in short: I think the issue of overhead on patches is something for us
to consider. We won't do something that breaks the integrity of the
code base, but there might be ample discussion directions. Thanks!
--Paul
On Fri, 2001-09-21 at 15:51, Paul Everitt wrote:
I'll reply in more depth later (on the way out for my b-day dinner)
Hey, happy birthday, Paul!
Michael Bernstein.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
