[Zope-dev] SQL Method Editing - Textarea should be sized equal to DTML Methods

2002-03-01 Thread Christian Theune
Hi. I just fixed something for myself that was simply a little annoying detail: The preferences dialog (which is used far to less i think) lets one choose how big dtml method/document editing boxes (textarea) should be. I know that IE resizes them automatically (was it css or jscript?) but

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-03-01 Thread Dario Lopez-Kästen
I'd like to see ZSQL methods altered so that bind variables could be used in SQL queries. This would improve SQL operations for at least Oracle, which is the one db I know of that uses bind variables to speed it's querie-management. This is filed as a bugreport in the collector previously but

Re: [Zope-dev] improved logging

2002-03-01 Thread Chris Withers
Romain Slootmaekers wrote: - Loggers (fi, file logger, db loggers, remote logger, nulllogger,...) Zope already has a filer logger, I dunno what you mean by db, remote and null loggers, perhaps you can explain? - Filters (fi on severity, on subsystem, ...) zLOG already provides this. Set

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope-Coders] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-03-01 Thread Toby Dickenson
On Thursday 28 February 2002 3:00 pm, Brian Lloyd wrote: Paul sent a note to zope-coders some time back fishing for some feedback regarding planning for a Zope 2.6 (excepted): I propose that planning for a 2.6 focus on the following thoughts: I wholeheartedly agree that 2.6 needs to be

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-03-01 Thread seb bacon
Absolutely ... and I would also like to see Richards excellent Call Profiler service become part of the core. I'm definitely putting the profiler into 2.6 - there's just an open question of where it gets put. The question was asked on zope-coders, and got no response. I figure if

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-03-01 Thread seb bacon
I'd like to see the ZSyncer Product, or a variant thereof, included in Zope by default. That is, I'd like Synchronization, to a be a default property of Zope objects, so that objects/content can be pushed and pulled between two Zope installations. I would use ZCVSFolder or somewhat

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-03-01 Thread Steve Alexander
seb bacon wrote: I think the use cases driving synchronisation requirements are not yet sufficiently understood. Agreed, it's a feature that many people need, but I get the impression it would be premature to include ZSyncer as is in Zope without more detailed planning. On the other hand,

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-03-01 Thread Chris Withers
Steve Alexander wrote: Yeah... maybe we need a standard Zope Expansion Kit that is a cohesive package of products that aren't in the Zope core, but are officially sanctioned and versioned and released alongside versions of Zope. I thought that's what the /Products directory in the standard

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope-Coders] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-03-01 Thread Chris Withers
Toby Dickenson wrote: The 2.6 timeframe should allow me to find some time to integrate my Unicode support (in ZPublisher, ZServer, and DTML), if there is agreement that this is the right thing to do. I'd +1 that in a big way :-) Especially combined with landing all Andreas' cool ZCatalog

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope-Coders] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-03-01 Thread Andreas Jung
- Original Message - From: Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 10:00 Subject: [Zope-Coders] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors! I wholeheartedly agree that 2.6 needs to be significantly a community effort.

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope-Coders] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-03-01 Thread Matthew T. Kromer
If I had to make a wild guess, I would say 2.6 might land in the May-June timeframe. I would anticipate a drive for finalization in May, with the release cycle in June. That's not official, just a good guess based on our historical release patterns. On Friday, March 1, 2002, at 06:56 AM,

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-03-01 Thread Chris McDonough
I'd suggest starting with the combination of Evan's zopemake and zctl scripts. One thing that zopemake could be extended with is an autoconf-style configure that figures out where the appropriate version of Python is, which C compiler to use, etc. - C - Original Message - From: Paul

Re: [Zope-dev] improved logging

2002-03-01 Thread Frank Tegtmeyer
Romain Slootmaekers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: db= log to database... remote:what if you want your logs to be put on another machine null logger does nothing. Handling the log output should be _completely_ separated from Zope. On the fly changes to log levels and separating ouput to

Re: [Zope-dev] improved logging

2002-03-01 Thread Chris McDonough
Have you looked at EventLogManager? http://www.zope.org/Members/mcdonc/Products/EventLogManager If I had it to do over again, I'd change lots, but it does do what you're asking for. what if I want to split the logs based on some condition I have to change code in Zope, and restart the

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-03-01 Thread marc lindahl
I would say, make SSL part of the standard z2.py, so you can turn on/off, specify address, etc. of https ports just as you do with http ports (and of course integrated with siteaccess2, etc.) ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-03-01 Thread Toby Dickenson
On Fri, 01 Mar 2002 09:48:08 -0500, marc lindahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would say, make SSL part of the standard z2.py, so you can turn on/off, specify address, etc. of https ports just as you do with http ports (and of course integrated with siteaccess2, etc.) Ive never really understood

Re: [Zope-dev] improved logging

2002-03-01 Thread Frank Tegtmeyer
Romain Slootmaekers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Handling the log output should be _completely_ separated from Zope. what do you mean exactly by '_completely_ separated' do you mean asynchronous handling ? Completely separated means that it isn't Zope's job to care for rotating logs,

Re: [Zope-dev] improved logging

2002-03-01 Thread Toby Dickenson
On 01 Mar 2002 16:27:18 +0100, Frank Tegtmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Completely separated means that it isn't Zope's job to care for rotating logs, filtering them and what else you could do to logs. There are lots of programs out there that are specialized in handling log data. We for

Re: [Zope-dev] improved logging

2002-03-01 Thread Jeffrey P Shell
See PEP 282 [1]. If this PEP is accepted, work should probably follow its course. It would be nice to have a single logging mechanism for Python, and for Zope to use and/or extend it. Granted, if it is accepted, it won't be in Python until Python 2.3 which I believe is due in August. ..[1]

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-03-01 Thread Jeffrey P Shell
On 3/1/02 7:30 AM, Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd suggest starting with the combination of Evan's zopemake and zctl scripts. One thing that zopemake could be extended with is an autoconf-style configure that figures out where the appropriate version of Python is, which C

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-03-01 Thread Andy Dustman
On Fri, 2002-03-01 at 04:16, Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote: I'd like to see ZSQL methods altered so that bind variables could be used in SQL queries. +1, even though MySQL doesn't bind variables (yet, apparently in the works for 4.0). Another thing I would like (and could probably write) is an

[Zope-dev] Zope Hotfix 2002-03-01 (Ownership Roles Enforcement)

2002-03-01 Thread Matthew T. Kromer
This hotfix addresses an important security issue that may affect some users of Zope versions 2.2.0 through 2.5.x The issue involves the checking of security for objects with proxy roles. The context of the owner user that created the object with proxy roles was not being taken into account

[Zope-dev] ZEO on Windows?

2002-03-01 Thread David Ascher
I'm having some issues trying to use ZEO on Win2k w/ Apache and Quixote. Specifically: - if I happen to call client code before the server is running, I get a python process which is completely hung -- I can't even kill it from the process monitor w/ administrator privs. Every client request