[Zope-dev] passive FTP to Zope with a specified port-range

2002-08-02 Thread Mr Tobias Schiebeck
Hi, I'm trying to modify the zope ftp-access to specify a port range within the server selects the ports for the passive ftp communication with the ftp-clients. This is in order to have the Zope server behind a firewall blocking more then the privileged ports only. I managed to modify the

[Zope-dev] The remaining spanner in the works :-)

2002-08-02 Thread Chris Withers
Shane Hathaway wrote: snip Wow! That was very very cool. I look forward to helping make this all a reality in Zope 3 ;-) I'm sure I left a few things out, so ask questions about the unclear parts. It's probably more info than you were expecting. ;-) Hmm, okay, the only problem I can think

Re: [Zope-dev] I'd like a zclass property to be a dictionary...

2002-08-02 Thread Chris Withers
Michael Beaulieu wrote: and how to do this is not clear to me.. You can't. Don't use ZClasses. Doing this with a Python Product would be easy :-) def __init__(self): self.dict = {} cheers, Chris ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Zope-dev] passive FTP to Zope with a specified port-range

2002-08-02 Thread Chris Withers
Mr Tobias Schiebeck wrote: 451 Server Error: socket.error, (98,'Address already in use'): file: /usr/lib/zope/ZServer/medusa/asyncore.py line: 250 Do you have any hints on this? Sadly not, but if you get this working, please lemme know, this owuld be very cool :-) cheers, Chris

Re: [Zope-dev] passive FTP to Zope with a specified port-range

2002-08-02 Thread Romain Slootmaekers
Mr Tobias Schiebeck wrote: Hi, I'm trying to modify the zope ftp-access to specify a port range within the server selects the ports for the passive ftp communication with the ftp-clients. This is in order to have the Zope server behind a firewall blocking more then the privileged ports

Re: [Zope-dev] passive FTP to Zope with a specified port-range

2002-08-02 Thread Antonio Orlando
I really dont understand the code, but seems like you are opening an already open connection. If I'm talking s... so /dev/null anTONIo Mr Tobias Schiebeck wrote: Hi, I'm trying to modify the zope ftp-access to specify a port range within the server selects the ports for the passive

[Zope-dev] Re: The remaining spanner in the works :-)

2002-08-02 Thread Shane Hathaway
Chris Withers wrote: Shane Hathaway wrote: snip Wow! That was very very cool. I look forward to helping make this all a reality in Zope 3 ;-) I'm sure I left a few things out, so ask questions about the unclear parts. It's probably more info than you were expecting. ;-) Hmm,

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: The remaining spanner in the works :-)

2002-08-02 Thread Gary Poster
I agree with Chris: *wow*! [re the original explanation] ... I'm sure I left a few things out, so ask questions about the unclear parts. Everything was wonderfully clear, except that the actual mechanism to convert the nested tuples flexibly to RDBMS record sequences escaped me a bit. This

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: The remaining spanner in the works :-)

2002-08-02 Thread Shane Hathaway
Gary Poster wrote: I agree with Chris: *wow*! [re the original explanation] ... I'm sure I left a few things out, so ask questions about the unclear parts. Everything was wonderfully clear, except that the actual mechanism to convert the nested tuples flexibly to RDBMS record

Re: [Zope-dev] passive FTP to Zope with a specified port-range

2002-08-02 Thread Brad Clements
On 2 Aug 2002 at 11:53, Mr Tobias Schiebeck wrote: I'm trying to modify the zope ftp-access to specify a port range within the server selects the ports for the passive ftp communication with the ftp-clients. This is in order to have the Zope server behind a firewall blocking more then the

Re: [Zope-dev] DTML and REQUEST data changes about to be checked in

2002-08-02 Thread Andy McKay
Likewise Im trying to digest all that and Im a little suprised. More magic in DTML? Not something I'd vote for normally. Im a little confused why this is suddenly an issue, yeah so we pull a string out of the REQUEST and thanks to DTML stack we may not know where it came from. Well thats always

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope components and revision control with cvs

2002-08-02 Thread Dan L. Pierson
--On Thursday, August 01, 2002 10:13:29 PM -0400 Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's really only a theoretical problem. To store the extra data about folderish objects, you can save the data in a hidden file called, for example, .properties. The theoretical problem is that

Re: [Zope-dev] DTML and REQUEST data changes about to be checked in

2002-08-02 Thread Martijn Pieters
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 08:55:13AM -0700, Andy McKay wrote: Likewise Im trying to digest all that and Im a little suprised. More magic in DTML? Not something I'd vote for normally. Im a little confused why this is suddenly an issue, yeah so we pull a string out of the REQUEST and thanks to

[Zope-dev] Calling a Python script from a

2002-08-02 Thread Gilles Lenfant
Hi, I'm searching a way to execute a ZODB untrusted python script with parameters and appropriate bindings (context, container...) from a file system Zope product. Where can I find some examples ? Thanks in advance. --Gilles ___ Zope-Dev

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope components and revision control with cvs

2002-08-02 Thread Dieter Maurer
Shane Hathaway writes: It's really only a theoretical problem. To store the extra data about folderish objects, you can save the data in a hidden file called, for example, .properties. The theoretical problem is that someone might give an object that name, since it's perfectly legal.

Re: [Zope-dev] Removing the acquisition wrapper from an object(Python script)

2002-08-02 Thread Dieter Maurer
Gilles Lenfant writes: ... obj.aq_explicit.some_attr Many thanks, exactly what I needed ! It will not always work, only usually. Dieter ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross

Re: [Zope-dev] Removing the acquisition wrapper from an object(Python script)

2002-08-02 Thread Adrian Hungate
Why do you say it will not always work? What situations might cause it not to work (Assuming that we already know that the object is acquisition wrapped?) Also, is there any hope of the documentation for acquisition being fleshed out a little and brought up to date? Adrian... -- Adrian Hungate