On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Barry Pederson wrote:
Sounds like you need the THREAD_STACKS_SIZE patch for FreeBSD's Python 2.1
Well, the others seeing the problem are *not* running FreeBSD.
I was able to confirm that one saw it with Windows2000. Not
sure about the others at the moment.
If you've
Hi list,
I want to embed the browserId value in every link/button/clickable-item of
the p
ages in my site, so that users get a sessioned access without using cookies.
How can I manage this task without having to manually rewrite the code of
the pa
ges served by the site?
Some pages are the
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 13:27, David Cain wrote:
I would like to apply Zope CMF to our organization which is made up of
numerous departments. Each department has one or more managers
(reviewers) and content providers. Also, some managers cross
departments, as well as content providers.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 03:20:39PM -0200, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
Local Roles rule and should have more visible placement in the Security
tab...
I constantly forget that it exists :)
While we're on the subject - are local roles acquired
in subfolders?
Hmm, maybe I should file that as
Well, the others seeing the problem are *not* running FreeBSD.
I was able to confirm that one saw it with Windows2000. Not
sure about the others at the moment.
Sorry mate, we've got ours (Win and Mac OS X) fixed. Our CMF was what
out of whack with an attempted patch to FSObject.py. Our issue
On February 12, Paul Winkler wrote:
While we're on the subject - are local roles acquired
in subfolders?
Yes, to the point that globals roles are actually redundant, but serve
as an optimisation of a local role at the same level as your
userfolder.
a.
--
Adrian van den Dries
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 11:14:18AM +1100, Adrian van den Dries wrote:
On February 12, Paul Winkler wrote:
While we're on the subject - are local roles acquired
in subfolders?
Yes, to the point that globals roles are actually redundant, but serve
as an optimisation of a local role at the
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 09:20 am, R. David Murray wrote:
[snip]
I sup regularly, and rebuild regularly. That patch is already
applied. Also, 2.2 appears to not need the patch, and it crashes, too.
I can confirm that 2.2 does need to be configured with a larger stack size to
work
