Re: [Zope-dev] Re: current best of breed ZEO for Zope 2.6.2 in production?

2003-10-03 Thread Magnus Heino
On Thursday 02 October 2003 19.50, Jeremy Hylton wrote: On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 13:34, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote: I thought that was easy to miss, so I changed the heading from Zope Enterprise Objects to Zope Enterprise Objects (OBSOLETE) And I still missed it!

[Zope-dev] catalogObject changes (Zope-2_6-branch)

2003-10-03 Thread Yuppie
Hi! Yesterday I spent some hours tracking down why catalog Metadata and catalog Indexes are getting out of sync in my CMF Site. I found that checkin http://cvs.zope.org/Zope/lib/python/Products/ZCatalog/Catalog.py.diff?r1=1.98.6.10r2=1.98.6.11 including this new condition code if not idxs:

[Zope-dev] Javascript variables Form element values and zope

2003-10-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hallo All, I have this little form and I would like to know how to persuade dtml or python to access the javascript variables in the set_p function and the element values in the form LOG. I'll be thankful for any assistance. htmlhead script language=JAVASCRIPT function set_p(a,b) { // // call a

[Zope-dev] Using 2.3.2 for Zope 2.7

2003-10-03 Thread Chris McDonough
Some people at ZC have made pretty compelling arguments to make Python 2.3.2 the recommended version of Python to use with Zope 2.7 final. I'm wondering if other people have a strong feeling about this either way. -- Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zope Corporation

Re: [Zope-dev] Using 2.3.2 for Zope 2.7

2003-10-03 Thread Andreas Jung
Weren't there some arguments that the security machinery must be checked against the changes in Python 2.3? Are we sure that 2.7 is as secure with 2.3 as with 2.2? In any case a bit +1 for going to 2.3.2. -aj --On Freitag, 3. Oktober 2003 10:21 Uhr -0400 Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope] Using 2.3.2 for Zope 2.7

2003-10-03 Thread george donnelly
[Chris McDonough wrote ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 10/3/03 9:21 AM] Some people at ZC have made pretty compelling arguments to make Python 2.3.2 the recommended version of Python to use with Zope 2.7 final. I'm wondering if other people have a strong feeling about this either way. yes please. :)

Re: [Zope-dev] Using 2.3.2 for Zope 2.7

2003-10-03 Thread Chris McDonough
Well, to be clear, there hasn't been any formal security audit of the combination of Python 2.2 with Zope 2.7. So we'd lose nothing by moving directly to 2.3. Jim is keen to get an audit going quickly before a 2.7 final release, and the audit would be performed against Python 2.3.2. On Fri,

Re: [Zope] Re: [Zope-dev] Using 2.3.2 for Zope 2.7

2003-10-03 Thread Toby Dickenson
On Friday 03 October 2003 15:33, Chris McDonough wrote: Jim is keen to get an audit going quickly before a 2.7 final release, and the audit would be performed against Python 2.3.2. Does anyone else have an interest in blessing Zope 2.6.x with Python 2.2/2.3 ? -- Toby Dickenson

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope] Using 2.3.2 for Zope 2.7

2003-10-03 Thread BZ
No strong feeling other than I don't have it installed yet. I spent awhile playing with 2.7b2 and python 2.3 with no issues. BZ Some people at ZC have made pretty compelling arguments to make Python 2.3.2 the recommended version of Python to use with Zope 2.7 final. I'm wondering if other

Re: [Zope] Re: [Zope-dev] Using 2.3.2 for Zope 2.7

2003-10-03 Thread Andrew Sawyers
I don't know about 'blessing', but I'm using it on a project currently (Python 2.3 and Zope 2.6.2) without glitches. Andrew Toby Dickenson wrote: On Friday 03 October 2003 15:33, Chris McDonough wrote: Jim is keen to get an audit going quickly before a 2.7 final release, and the audit would

Re: [Zope] Re: [Zope-dev] Using 2.3.2 for Zope 2.7

2003-10-03 Thread Paul Winkler
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 03:48:06PM +0100, Toby Dickenson wrote: On Friday 03 October 2003 15:33, Chris McDonough wrote: Jim is keen to get an audit going quickly before a 2.7 final release, and the audit would be performed against Python 2.3.2. Does anyone else have an interest in blessing

Re: [Zope] Re: [Zope-dev] Using 2.3.2 for Zope 2.7

2003-10-03 Thread Tres Seaver
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 10:58, Andrew Sawyers wrote: I don't know about 'blessing', but I'm using it on a project currently (Python 2.3 and Zope 2.6.2) without glitches. Andrew Toby Dickenson wrote: Does anyone else have an interest in blessing Zope 2.6.x with Python 2.2/2.3 ? We have

Re: [Zope] Re: [Zope-dev] Using 2.3.2 for Zope 2.7

2003-10-03 Thread Paul Winkler
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 10:33:01AM -0400, Chris McDonough wrote: Well, to be clear, there hasn't been any formal security audit of the combination of Python 2.2 with Zope 2.7. So we'd lose nothing by moving directly to 2.3. Jim is keen to get an audit going quickly before a 2.7 final

Re: [Zope] Re: [Zope-dev] Using 2.3.2 for Zope 2.7

2003-10-03 Thread Christian Theune
Am Fr, 2003-10-03 um 17.16 schrieb Paul Winkler: The only counterargument i can think of is that 2.3 may not be bundled with many linux distros yet. I've always compiled my own python for use with zope, so I don't know how big a deal that is. Debian stable requires it's own backports (self

Re: [Zope] Re: [Zope-dev] Using 2.3.2 for Zope 2.7

2003-10-03 Thread Fred L. Drake, Jr.
Paul Winkler writes: then by all means, 2.3.2. These audits seem to be hard to get going on a regular basis (we've been on python 2.1.3 for how long now?) so I see no point in blessing a version of python that's already not latest-and-greatest. It's not just that Python 2.2.3 is no

RE: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope] Using 2.3.2 for Zope 2.7

2003-10-03 Thread Tim Peters
[Chris McDonough] Some people at ZC have made pretty compelling arguments to make Python 2.3.2 the recommended version of Python to use with Zope 2.7 final. I'm wondering if other people have a strong feeling about this either way. [george donnelly] yes please. :) python 2.3 seems a lot

RE: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope] Using 2.3.2 for Zope 2.7

2003-10-03 Thread Chris McDonough
OK, sounds like a slam dunk to me. I have changed the Zope 2.7 windows builder to use Python 2.3.2 and I have changed the source version configure script to look for 2.3.2 as it's optimal version. This all appears to work. Once an RPM is released for Python 2.3.2, I'll change the spec file for

RE: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope] Using 2.3.2 for Zope 2.7

2003-10-03 Thread Fred L. Drake, Jr.
Chris McDonough writes: Currently, Zope still claims it works with 2.2.X (via the configure script's acceptable versions feature). Should we continue to make that claim true by not depending on any Python 2.3-specific features in the Zope core? I don't think there are a lot of

RE: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope] Using 2.3.2 for Zope 2.7

2003-10-03 Thread Tim Peters
[Chris McDonough] Currently, Zope still claims it works with 2.2.X (via the configure script's acceptable versions feature). Actually, 2.2, 2.2.1, and 2.2.2 aren't acceptable for Zope even now, because of Zope-critical Python bugs first fixed in 2.2.3. There's no version of 2.2 with a fix for

Re: [Zope-dev] Javascript variables Form element values and zope

2003-10-03 Thread J. Cameron Cooper
This list is for development of Zope. You want the zope users list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have this little form and I would like to know how to persuade dtml or python to access the javascript variables in the set_p function and the element values in the form LOG. This is impossible as you

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope] Using 2.3.2 for Zope 2.7

2003-10-03 Thread Jamie Heilman
Chris McDonough wrote: OK, sounds like a slam dunk to me. I think its a fine idea (finally secure temporary files!), but let me present the first bug I've run into with 2.3 (I've been testing with it). In 2.3 you can no longer declare new classes in a Script object. It bitches about a lack of

Re: [Zope-dev] Javascript variables Form element values and zope

2003-10-03 Thread Dieter Maurer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote at 2003-10-3 13:34 +0100: I have this little form and I would like to know how to persuade dtml or python to access the javascript variables in the set_p function and the element values in the form LOG. I cannot do that: DTML lives on the server, Javascript on the

Re: [Zope-dev] catalogObject changes (Zope-2_6-branch)

2003-10-03 Thread Dieter Maurer
Yuppie wrote at 2003-10-3 10:14 +0200: Yesterday I spent some hours tracking down why catalog Metadata and catalog Indexes are getting out of sync in my CMF Site. I found that checkin http://cvs.zope.org/Zope/lib/python/Products/ZCatalog/Catalog.py.diff?r1=1.98.6.10r2=1.98.6.11

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: current best of breed ZEO for Zope 2.6.2 in production?

2003-10-03 Thread Dieter Maurer
Jeremy Hylton wrote at 2003-10-2 13:50 -0400: ... On the other hand, Jim asked me today how someone would navigate from the zope.org home page to the current ZODB release. I don't have any idea. Anyone else know? I just use Google. The W3C has quite a good scheme: a fixed URL always

[Zope-dev] ZConfig changes

2003-10-03 Thread Fred L. Drake, Jr.
Phillip Eby and I both checked new functionality into ZConfig today; the documentation has been updated. If these changes are still looking good in a week or two, I'll plan on releasing it as ZConfig 2.0. Both sets of changes revolve around schema extension, but they support different things.

[Zope-dev] testSetupServers() in Zope-2_7-branch?

2003-10-03 Thread Tim Peters
== ERROR: testSetupServers (Zope.Startup.tests.testStarter.ZopeStarterTestCase) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope] Using 2.3.2 for Zope 2.7

2003-10-03 Thread Anthony Baxter
Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote Requiring 2.3 (any flavor) would allow us to drop the copy of the logging package from Zope 2.7 and newer. There are greater benefits for Zope 3, where we have several modules and packages laying around that would no longer be needed (logging, csv, gettext).