[Zope-dev] RE: Resolved security-related collector issues for thepublic?

2004-01-22 Thread Maik Jablonski
Hi Brian, Brian Lloyd wrote: As the person who unfailingly gets flamed no matter which way the decisions leans :), I think we are probably at a point where we should have an official, documented and community-agreed-to policy on how these kinds of things will be handled. My intent was not

[Zope-dev] Resolved security-related collector issues for the public?

2004-01-22 Thread Clemens Robbenhaar
[...] there were several security-related fixes in the collector (and the collector-mailing-list) in the last days. Normaly security-related stuff is not visible for the public... and this seems to be good to avoid exploits etc. At least for the resolved issues the fixed are public

RE: [Zope-dev] RE: Resolved security-related collector issues forthepublic?

2004-01-22 Thread Brian Lloyd
Brian Lloyd wrote: As the person who unfailingly gets flamed no matter which way the decisions leans :), I think we are probably at a point where we should have an official, documented and community-agreed-to policy on how these kinds of things will be handled. My intent was not

RE: [Zope-dev] Re: RFC: backward compatibility of ps bindingsRESOLUTION

2004-01-22 Thread Brian Lloyd
I did check with a fresh 2.6 xx A DCWorkflow script that was not not called with the version from a few hours ago is now called but produces the following traceback This happens when the container binding is set to container and also when it is cleared. Traceback (innermost last):

Re: [Zope-dev] Resolved security-related collector issues for the public?

2004-01-22 Thread Jamie Heilman
Clemens Robbenhaar wrote: malicious Python Scripts on my site (I guess ;-), and I do not use DTML or some Tree-stuff -- thus I did not upgrade yet, and You may feel free Actually... unless you've altered the ZMI and HelpSys, you do use dtml-tree ...and HelpSys is publically traversable by

Re: [Zope-dev] RE: Resolved security-related collector issues forthepublic?

2004-01-22 Thread Richard Waid
Brian Lloyd wrote: ...or will decide that doing so is unreasonable and use something else instead :( Note that I'm not necessarily criticizing that particular policy, just pointing out that _any_ policy will have some upside and some downside. The challenge will be coming to agreement on a

Re: [Zope-dev] RE: Resolved security-related collector issues forthepublic?

2004-01-22 Thread Paul Winkler
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 09:45:43AM +1300, Richard Waid wrote: Brian Lloyd wrote: ...or will decide that doing so is unreasonable and use something else instead :( Note that I'm not necessarily criticizing that particular policy, just pointing out that _any_ policy will have some upside

Re: [Zope-dev] Resolved security-related collector issues for the public?

2004-01-22 Thread Clemens Robbenhaar
Jamie Heilman writes: Clemens Robbenhaar wrote: malicious Python Scripts on my site (I guess ;-), and I do not use DTML or some Tree-stuff -- thus I did not upgrade yet, and You may feel free Actually... unless you've altered the ZMI and HelpSys, you do use dtml-tree ...and HelpSys

Re: [Zope-dev] RE: Resolved security-related collector issues forthepublic?

2004-01-22 Thread Richard Waid
Paul Winkler wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 09:45:43AM +1300, Richard Waid wrote: How about something along the lines of: - Development team only disclosure for the first x days (2 to 7 days is the maximum here I would think), in order to develop a workaround/patch. - Full disclosure after

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: RFC: backward compatibility of ps bindingsRESOLUTION

2004-01-22 Thread robert rottermann
Brian Lloyd wrote: I did check with a fresh 2.6 xx A DCWorkflow script that was not not called with the version from a few hours ago is now called but produces the following traceback This happens when the container binding is set to container and also when it is cleared. Traceback (innermost