Re: [Zope-dev] Why third_party/docutils?

2004-12-17 Thread Alan Milligan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 And while we're talking about docutils, the delivered Reporter warning/error functions write directly to STDOUT. We have ReST functionality in Zpydoc, and we get loads and loads and loads of crap 'invalid unindent' messages streamed to STDOUT from the

Re: [Zope-dev] Why third_party/docutils?

2004-12-17 Thread Andreas Jung
Please file a collector issue otherwise it might be forgotten. -aj --On Freitag, 17. Dezember 2004 19:00 Uhr +1100 Alan Milligan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 And while we're talking about docutils, the delivered Reporter warning/error functions write

[Zope-dev] 2.7 and 2.8 roadmap

2004-12-17 Thread Tim Hicks
Hi, just wondering what the plans are for zope 2.7 and 2.8. Specifically: 1) When is the recent release of 2.7.4b2 expected to be followed up with a 'final' (or indeed another beta) release? 2) I have seen mutterings about a 2.7.5 release, but I'm not sure why this should be necessary as I

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.7 and 2.8 roadmap

2004-12-17 Thread Andreas Jung
--On Freitag, 17. Dezember 2004 12:27 Uhr + Tim Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, just wondering what the plans are for zope 2.7 and 2.8. Specifically: 1) When is the recent release of 2.7.4b2 expected to be followed up with a 'final' (or indeed another beta) release? 2.7.4 final is

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.7 and 2.8 roadmap

2004-12-17 Thread Tim Hicks
Andreas Jung said: 1) When is the recent release of 2.7.4b2 expected to be followed up with a 'final' (or indeed another beta) release? 2.7.4 final is scheduled for early January. Ok, thanks. 2) I have seen mutterings about a 2.7.5 release, but I'm not sure why this should be

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.7 and 2.8 roadmap

2004-12-17 Thread Andreas Jung
--On Freitag, 17. Dezember 2004 13:06 Uhr + Tim Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW, the two things I'd like are a stable 2.7 release in the short term to setup a new site on, and a stable 2.8 release to develop a new product on. Sounds like Santa (aka Andreas) will be bringing the former

Re: [Zope-dev] Is Zope.2.7.4 feature frozen ?

2004-12-17 Thread Rodrigo Dias Arruda Senra
Jim Fulton wrote: Rodrigo Dias Arruda Senra wrote: Hi, is the Zope 2.7.4 feature frozen ? Huh? Zope 2.7 is feature frozen. New features need to go into 2.8. Jim Fair enough. I do understand the rationale why new features should follow major releases. However, I was lead to believe that 2.7.x

Re: [Zope-dev] Is Zope.2.7.4 feature frozen ?

2004-12-17 Thread Andreas Jung
--On Freitag, 17. September 2004 11:58 Uhr -0300 Rodrigo Dias Arruda Senra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, I was lead to believe that 2.7.x was not feature frozen due to the Zope 2.7.4 beta 1 - Features added ... section in http://zope.org/Products/Zope/2.7.4b2/CHANGES.txt These are

[Zope-dev] Re: Zope Service on Windows

2004-12-17 Thread Tres Seaver
Mark Hammond wrote: I just checked in how I finally got Zope 2.7.x to run as a service on Windows again. See also http://collector.zope.org/Zope/1533 - this has a number of changes to make services much more reliable on Windows. My patch includes your change, but along the lines of Tim's

[Zope-dev] Re: Why third_party/docutils?

2004-12-17 Thread Tres Seaver
Andreas Jung wrote: You're still not getting the point. Z2 shipped and Z3 ships with a *stripped* down version of Docutils where only the docutils subfolder is used. Now the *whole* package is included which makes it necessary to adjust the paths. Moving this as a whole to lib/python does *not*

[Zope-dev] Re: Why third_party/docutils?

2004-12-17 Thread Tres Seaver
Andreas Jung wrote: --On Freitag, 17. Dezember 2004 11:34 Uhr -0500 Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andreas Jung wrote: I don't get this. Why couldn't we just delete the *entire* stripped-down 'docutils' package and replace it with the *whole* package *in exactly the same location*? E.g.

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Zope Service on Windows

2004-12-17 Thread Tim Peters
[Mark Hammond] See also http://collector.zope.org/Zope/1533 - this has a number of changes to make services much more reliable on Windows. My patch includes your change, but along the lines of Tim's objection, mine compromises with: +os.environ[PYTHONPATH] = os.environ.get(PYTHONPATH, ) + ;