On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 20:50:22 +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
The fix is (almost surely) to replace in .../Zope/App/startup.py:
if t is ZPublisher.Retry: v.reraise()
by
if t is ZPublisher.Retry: t, v, traceback = v._args
Yes, that's better than my fix.
2. If there is at least one
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 05:24:08PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
Heads up for the 2.8.0 final release. My plans are to make the final
release on Saturday morning. So any further changes should be done by
tomorrow at the latest.
Cheers,
-aj
Mind if I check in text-only changes to the 2_8
On 6/10/05, Paul Winkler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mind if I check in text-only changes to the 2_8 branch?
It's still Friday for Andreas, so this is a good time!
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.fdrake at gmail.com
Zope Corporation
___
Zope-Dev
For a migration situation like yours I would highly suggest you use a
simple script that acts as a ZEO client to two ZEO servers
Inspired by this post, I wrote just such a migration script and have
posted it on Zope Labs:
http://www.zopelabs.com/cookbook/1118424287
Thanks for the tip
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:27:15PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 10. Juni 2005 12:39:50 -0400 Fred Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/10/05, Paul Winkler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mind if I check in text-only changes to the 2_8 branch?
It's still Friday for Andreas, so this is a good
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 02:21:32PM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
Done. Like I said, just trivial docs typos.
While I'm at it, anybody object to the attached patch to
doc/FAQ.txt ?
--
Paul Winkler
http://www.slinkp.com
Index: FAQ.txt
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 03:07:51PM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 02:21:32PM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
Done. Like I said, just trivial docs typos.
While I'm at it, anybody object to the attached patch to
doc/FAQ.txt ?
(snip)
Holy crap, FAQ.txt is rally crufty.
[Paul Winkler]
Holy crap, FAQ.txt is rally crufty.
It's loaded with pcgi information and other useless crap.
Gimme a minute to come up with a better patch.
I should make a branch for this.
I vote you check in changes instead, until you run out of time. Every
improvement will lessen
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 02:21:32PM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
Done. Like I said, just trivial docs typos.
Yeah, but improvements are improvements!
On 6/10/05, Paul Winkler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I'm at it, anybody object to the attached patch to
doc/FAQ.txt ?
I don't see a need to
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 03:40:41PM -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
[Paul Winkler]
Holy crap, FAQ.txt is rally crufty.
It's loaded with pcgi information and other useless crap.
Gimme a minute to come up with a better patch.
I should make a branch for this.
I vote you check in changes
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 04:04:48PM -0400, Fred Drake wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 02:21:32PM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
Done. Like I said, just trivial docs typos.
Yeah, but improvements are improvements!
On 6/10/05, Paul Winkler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I'm at it, anybody
Am 09.06.2005, 19:28 Uhr
schrieb Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A long time ago, Shane posted a very useful function
to analyse acquisition wrappers: showaq.
Maybe, the mailing list archive is still able to locate his post...
Just ask Google:
[Fred Drake]
I don't see a need to include the disclaimer about Python 2.4; I test
on 2.4, and use Zope 3 trunk with 2.4.1 all the time.
[Paul Winkler]
Maybe you do, but it really is a FAQ, and that's the consensus response
from the chorus every time it comes up on the main zope list, so I
Malcolm Cleaton wrote at 2005-6-10 11:00 +0100:
...
2. If there is at least one ConflictError and then the request finishes
with an error (either more ConflictErrors or something else), the Z2 log
shows the request as having been answered with status 200, although
actually a status 500 error
14 matches
Mail list logo
