--On 25. März 2006 21:40:48 +0100 Yoshinori Okuji [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 25 March 2006 15:56, Andreas Jung wrote:
Zope 2.7 throws a BadPickleGet, 12 exception, Zope 2.8 throws
BadPickleGet, 13 and Zope 2.9 raises the described UnicodeDecodeError.
I don't expect that the import
--On 26. März 2006 09:58:07 +0100 Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the patch (commited for Zope 2.8, 2.9. trunk). This solves at
least the import problems on my side. Unfortunately there are no tests
for export/import so fixing issues is like flying blindfolded.
Although the
Andreas Jung wrote:
CMF or not - if one need such a functionality one can download CMF or
a related product. If such functionality should belong into the core
than it should be implemented in a reusable way and frameworks like CMF
should be build on top of it. So -1 for the request.
Indeed,
Hi All,
Just so people know, if you see spoor in the collectors, Tres wrote a
handy script/template to let you delete them.
You'll need to be a manager in /Collectors or above. If you are, just go to:
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/remove_dodgy_issue
Fill in the boxes and click the button.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
CMF or not - if one need such a functionality one can download CMF or
a related product. If such functionality should belong into the core
than it should be implemented in a reusable way and frameworks
Chris Withers wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
CMF or not - if one need such a functionality one can download CMF or
a related product. If such functionality should belong into the core
than it should be implemented in a reusable way and frameworks like
CMF should be build on top of it. So -1 for
Tino Wildenhain wrote:
Maybe its just me but I personally dont like direct filesystem
access in the core - if someone wants it, (s)he can pick from
the 3rd party products - maybe there can be a list of recommended
(active maintained) products? Direct access products should also
carry some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yoshinori Okuji wrote:
On Saturday 25 March 2006 15:56, Andreas Jung wrote:
Zope 2.7 throws a BadPickleGet, 12 exception, Zope 2.8 throws
BadPickleGet, 13 and Zope 2.9 raises the described UnicodeDecodeError.
I don't expect that the import
Tres Seaver wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Log message for revision 66185:
update to latest revision of ZODB 3.6 for upcoming release
Should'nt we be tagging a ZODB release for this? I *really* don't like
the practice of releasing a product which has non-tagged dependencies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Log message for revision 66185:
update to latest revision of ZODB 3.6 for upcoming release
Should'nt we be tagging a ZODB release for this? I *really* don't like
the practice of releasing a product which has
--On 26. März 2006 14:31:25 -0500 Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Log message for revision 66185:
update to latest revision of ZODB 3.6 for upcoming release
Should'nt we be tagging a ZODB release for
I notice the 2.9.1 binary a rolled a couple of weeks back seems to emit
this warning every time I start Zope.
Is there something I've done wrong or is something else causing this?
What version of pywin32 did you use for the build? Is an earlier one
already installed on the target box with
Hi,
Zope 2.8 ships/shipped with Five 1.0 which is very old and no longer
actively maintained. Most ppl doing currently development with Zope 2.8
are using Five 1.2. Should we upgrade the Five version in Zope 2.8 to Five
1.2 to make their lives a bit easier? There is possibly a compatiblity
Hi Mark,
I see you replied, but I missed this first time round:
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2006-March/027166.html
What version of pywin32 did you use for the build?
http://svn.zope.org/Zope/trunk/inst/WinBuilders/README.txt?rev=65838view=auto
...shows the exact list of
14 matches
Mail list logo
