[Zope-dev] buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot

2006-09-17 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 7698 Blamelist: andreasjung,benji_york,chrism,ctheune,dobe,fdrake,flox,jim,jukart,mgedmin,poster,rogerineichen,srichter BUILD

[Zope-dev] buildbot failure in Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot

2006-09-17 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.10 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 7699 Blamelist: andreasjung BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot _

[Zope-dev] WebDAV PUT factory tests failing on 2.10 branch

2006-09-17 Thread Andreas Jung
Those two tests are currently failing on the 2.10 branch (updated with the Zope 3.3.0rc1 code). Any hints? Andreas --- Error in test testSubfolderInsideOutVirtualHosting (webdav.tests.testPUT_factory.TestPUTFactory) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/python-2.4.3/lib

[Zope-dev] Re: WebDAV PUT factory tests failing on 2.10 branch

2006-09-17 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
AFAIK, Stefan Hollek checked it in to demonstrate an incompatibility of Zope 2.10 vs. 2.9. See http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/2187. Andreas Jung wrote: Those two tests are currently failing on the 2.10 branch (updated with the Zope 3.3.0rc1 code). Any hints? Andreas --- E

[Zope-dev] Re: WebDAV PUT factory tests failing on 2.10 branch

2006-09-17 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 17. September 2006 12:38:11 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: AFAIK, Stefan Hollek checked it in to demonstrate an incompatibility of Zope 2.10 vs. 2.9. See http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/2187. Ahh..I remember. @Stefan: is this a blocker? Any chance to

[Zope-dev] Serving large files

2006-09-17 Thread Sidnei da Silva
I remember having a conversation with Jim at some point where he proposed a strategy for requests that could potentially take a long time to finish. If I recall correctly, he proposed having a separate ZODB connection pool. One thing that is problematic today is serving large files from the ZODB (

Re: [Zope-dev] Serving large files

2006-09-17 Thread Tino Wildenhain
Sidnei da Silva schrieb: I remember having a conversation with Jim at some point where he proposed a strategy for requests that could potentially take a long time to finish. If I recall correctly, he proposed having a separate ZODB connection pool. One thing that is problematic today is serving

Re: [Zope-dev] Serving large files

2006-09-17 Thread Christian Theune
Hi, Sidnei da Silva wrote: > I remember having a conversation with Jim at some point where he > proposed a strategy for requests that could potentially take a long > time to finish. If I recall correctly, he proposed having a separate > ZODB connection pool. > > One thing that is problematic toda

Re: [Zope-dev] Serving large files

2006-09-17 Thread Sidnei da Silva
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 09:24:40PM +0200, Christian Theune wrote: | I wonder whether this statement is true: | |Any connection handed out after the connection breaks the ACID |compliance of the request. | | I think this is because: | |When finishing the actual work we have to either

Re: [Zope-dev] Serving large files

2006-09-17 Thread Christian Theune
Sidnei da Silva wrote: > On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 09:24:40PM +0200, Christian Theune wrote: > | I wonder whether this statement is true: > | > |Any connection handed out after the connection breaks the ACID > |compliance of the request. > | > | I think this is because: > | > |When f