Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 3.4.0b2 update

2007-11-17 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Nov 16, 2007 6:02 PM, Stephan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I just wanted to report that the Zope 3.4.0b2 tag of the Zope 3 source tree seems to work very well in an older application of mine. I only had to fix a few deprecation warning and there was a deprecation warning within

[Zope-dev] Re: AW: Doc strings of IContentProvider

2007-11-17 Thread Thomas Lotze
Roger Ineichen wrote: The IContentProvider interfaces is a marker interface which describes what a component must support that it get collected by the Tales Expression. As an aside, I think that a marker interface is one that doesn't describe any interface elements at all, but just there to,

[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 5 OK

2007-11-17 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Fri Nov 16 13:00:00 2007 UTC to Sat Nov 17 13:00:00 2007 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Fri Nov 16 20:53:16 EST 2007

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Zope without Zope

2007-11-17 Thread Stefan H. Holek
On 17. Nov 2007, at 02:15, Martin Aspeli wrote: I understand the historical reasons behind these dependencies, but I genuinely think we should pick a few libraries that are useful to the outside world (zope.interface, zope.component, zope.configuration, zope.annotation, zope.event come to

[Zope-dev] release checker bot results (11/17/2007)

2007-11-17 Thread Chris McDonough
Attempting to easy_install all 'zope'-related releases using the script at http://svn.repoze.org/playground/trunk/chris/zopesvnchecker/releasechecker.py , the results were: 8 failures, 183 successes. See http://www.plope.com/static/misc/rcresults-2007-11.17.txt for details. - C

[Zope-dev] french PO file ready to commit

2007-11-17 Thread Christophe Combelles
Hello, the new zope.po file has been reviewed by french users and is now ready to be committed. It would be great to have it included in the RC of zope 3.4 so that any remaining error could be found. Since I don't have commit permission, I have to ask someone to do it, the file is attached

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Zope without Zope

2007-11-17 Thread Jim Fulton
On Nov 16, 2007, at 8:15 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote: ... In any case, I definitely see a case for both. I can't see a good reason why we can't have support for simple XML-based component registration without having to depend on the ZODB and tons of other Zope eggs. You're right. We can.

[Zope-dev] Re: Zope without Zope

2007-11-17 Thread Martin Aspeli
Jim Fulton wrote: I understand the historical reasons behind these dependencies, but I genuinely think we should pick a few libraries that are useful to the outside world (zope.interface, zope.component, zope.configuration, zope.annotation, zope.event come to mind) and work to make these

[Zope-dev] Re: Zope without Zope

2007-11-17 Thread Martijn Faassen
Stephan Richter wrote: On Friday 16 November 2007, Jim Fulton wrote: Something is broken here and it needs to be fixed. Well, the easiest solution would be to remove those misbehaving distributions from the cheeseshop. However, I think we kid ourselves if we think that the cheeseshop will

Re: [Zope-dev] release checker bot results (11/17/2007)

2007-11-17 Thread Jim Fulton
I'm trying to get ZODB4, ZopeX3 and Zope X3. One of the failures is Zope. This is not meant to be installed as an egg. AFAIK, not everything in PyPI is necessarily a package distribution. If I'm mistaken, we should probably remove it, otherwise, you might want to explicitly remove it

Re: [Zope-dev] release checker bot results (11/17/2007)

2007-11-17 Thread Chris McDonough
On Nov 17, 2007, at 2:18 PM, Jim Fulton wrote: I'm trying to get ZODB4, ZopeX3 and Zope X3. Nice. One of the failures is Zope. This is not meant to be installed as an egg. AFAIK, not everything in PyPI is necessarily a package distribution. If I'm mistaken, we should probably remove

[Zope-dev] Re: release checker bot results (11/17/2007)

2007-11-17 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Chris McDonough wrote: Attempting to easy_install all 'zope'-related releases using the script at http://svn.repoze.org/playground/trunk/chris/zopesvnchecker/releasechecker.py , the results were: 8 failures, 183 successes. See http://www.plope.com/static/misc/rcresults-2007-11.17.txt for

[Zope-dev] Re: release checker bot results (11/17/2007)

2007-11-17 Thread Chris McDonough
I think if we can fix zope.i18n's dependencies, some dependency chains will get reduced. - C On Nov 17, 2007, at 5:22 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Chris McDonough wrote: Attempting to easy_install all 'zope'-related releases using the script at

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: release checker bot results (11/17/2007)

2007-11-17 Thread Stephan Richter
On Saturday 17 November 2007, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: The recurring number of 77 dependencies is suspicious. No doubt the various zope.app packages with their huge amount of dependencies are behind this. Apparently, those 77 eggs are the minimal Zope3 installation we can do from eggs.

[Zope-dev] KGS Site Updated

2007-11-17 Thread Stephan Richter
Hi everyone, I just updated the Zope 3.4 KGS with some new features. 1. You only need to upload the controlled-packages.cfg file now; all other files are generated. 2. The controlled-packages.cfg file now supports a name and version option. Thus, all generated files are versioned now. The

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 3.4.0b2 update

2007-11-17 Thread Stephan Richter
On Saturday 17 November 2007, Lennart Regebro wrote: Great stuff. Time for 3.4.0? I am waiting for the following: 1. Final ZODB 3.8.0 release. All critical bugs have been fixed. Jim needs to review those last bug fixes and then create a release. 2.Final buildout 1.0.0. Jim said that some