Stephan Richter wrote: I think the application control namespace code could simply be moved to zope.app.applicationcontrol, since the latter package does needs zope.traversing anyways. True, but I don't see how to do this cleanly as long as the namespace handler for the etc namespace is
Tres Seaver wrote: +100 to shedding the dependencies. Could we have the conditional import work as a fallback to a utility lookup? And then change 'zope.applicationcontrol' to register such a utility? This should be possible, but the utility lookup would have to be conditional as well since
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Nov 20 13:00:00 2007 UTC to Wed Nov 21 13:00:00 2007 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Tue Nov 20 20:53:00 EST 2007
On Oct 4, 2007 11:02 AM, Sidnei da Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not sure what Zope 3 is using these days (haven't checked), but Zope 2 had a 'Signals' package that handled signaling events on both Windows and *nix in a somewhat transparent way. Has anyone thought of packaging that as an egg?
Chris Withers wrote at 2007-11-20 23:55 +: Dieter Maurer wrote: You execute their code in a globals the __builtins__ of which contains precisely the builtins you want to give them. unfortunately that still leaves the import problems, correct? The import command is mapped to the __import__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Lotze wrote: Tres Seaver wrote: +100 to shedding the dependencies. Could we have the conditional import work as a fallback to a utility lookup? And then change 'zope.applicationcontrol' to register such a utility? This should be
FYI, this is somewhat related to the convos we've had about the KGS/ PyPi/buildout/setuptools/easy_install: http://www.plope.com/Members/chrism/easier_install - C ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
I suspect nobody responded because we're a litle behind the 8-ball on getting the set of eggs we've already released into the wild working right, but +1 to this eventually... On Nov 21, 2007, at 8:09 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote: On Oct 4, 2007 11:02 AM, Sidnei da Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]