On Mar 26, 2008, at 01:12 , Timothy Selivanow wrote:
I would rather have a package that upstream approves of and
participates
in, than blindly create it in a silo not caring. It never turns out
well in the long run with the latter.
You may be fighting windmills here. Previous attempts at
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Tue Mar 25 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Wed Mar 26 12:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Tue Mar 25 21:53:46 EDT 2008
URL:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benji York wrote:
Benji York wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
This looks somehow tied to the surgery you were doing yesterday on
zope.testbrowser: can you check it out?
I'll take a look at it some more this evening and see if I can figure
out
Hello,
I have some troubles installing ZODB under Windows with Python 2.5.1. Benji
York recommended to post here.
The following it the problem:
I downloaded the egg file for ZODB from
http://pypi.python.org/packages/2.5/Z/ZODB3/ZODB3-3.8.0-py2.5-win32.egg#md5=2a7c8eb2ad6304a859ffdf5e2b9a075f
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 25, 2008, at 5:25 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Security proxies: this topic may not be directly publisher related,
It's not.
but maybe it is.
Nope. :)
Somewhere quite low in the request handling of Zope 3 a
Matthew Grant wrote:
FYI - Test coverage in zope.sendmail was originally pretty thin.
Hmmm, apply some svn blame, find the culprite and lets arrange some
burning at the stake...
Seriously, am I right in remembering Zope 3 and all things related to
have been test first from day 1?
Zope3
Timothy Selivanow wrote at 2008-3-25 17:12 -0700:
...
Now when I say rip out, I don't mean repackage (make a sub RPM), I
mean remove from the RPM that I am making. I don't want to provide a
new Docutils.
That Zope ships with its own Docutils comes from the fact
that the standard one has a big
