Re: [Zope-dev] Re: AW: Heads up: Dependencies!

2008-04-15 Thread Christian Theune
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 12:25:46PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: On Apr 12, 2008, at 10:01 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: Even better: use the documented setuptools keyword[1] 'tests_require', and get the testrunner / buildout to use that hook when running tests. This doesn't address the central

Re: [Zope-dev] A permanent log for buildouts

2008-04-15 Thread Chris Withers
Jim Fulton wrote: configuration. IMO, it would be enough to provide an option to name a logger config file as described in: http://docs.python.org/lib/logging-config-fileformat.html This stuff is an annoying dead end in that it only lets you use log handlers defined inside the logging

[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 5 OK

2008-04-15 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Apr 14 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Tue Apr 15 11:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Apr 14 21:00:07 EDT 2008 URL:

[Zope-dev] Re: Five and browser-oriented components

2008-04-15 Thread Martijn Faassen
Alexander Limi wrote: On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:11:11 -0700, Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *IF* you'd like to be pragmatic, I'd suggest we clean up those failing Plone tests, merge the branch and be on our way. I'm also happy to make it visible on the Plone agenda, as long

AW: [Zope-dev] Re: AW: Heads up: Dependencies!

2008-04-15 Thread Roger Ineichen
Hi Christian Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] Re: AW: Heads up: Dependencies! On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 12:25:46PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: On Apr 12, 2008, at 10:01 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: Even better: use the documented setuptools keyword[1] 'tests_require', and get the testrunner / buildout

[Zope-dev] Exception verbosity in CA

2008-04-15 Thread Malthe Borch
Some motivation: File .../zope/interface/adapter.py, line 482, in queryMultiAdapter result = factory(*objects) TypeError: __init__() takes exactly 2 arguments (3 given) Perhaps the need for introspection tools would not be so immediate if the exceptions were more informative; for

[Zope-dev] Field for blobs?

2008-04-15 Thread Christian Zagrodnick
Hi, I'd need a zope.schema field for blobs. Should this go directly to zope.schema or some third party package? Something like bla = zope.schema.Blob(title=...) would be nice to have. -- Christian Zagrodnick gocept gmbh co. kg · forsterstrasse 29 · 06112 halle/saale www.gocept.com ·

Re: [Zope-dev] Field for blobs?

2008-04-15 Thread Nikolay Kim
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 16:14 +0200, Christian Zagrodnick wrote: Hi, I'd need a zope.schema field for blobs. Should this go directly to zope.schema or some third party package? there is z3c.schema package for various third party packages ___

AW: [Zope-dev] Field for blobs?

2008-04-15 Thread Roger Ineichen
Hi Christian Regards Roger Ineichen _ END OF MESSAGE -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Nikolay Kim Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. April 2008 22:29 An: zope-dev@zope.org Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] Field

Re: AW: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-Users] How do I automatically login a user]

2008-04-15 Thread kevin gill
I have made many changes to the first version of this proposal and submitted a new version to the wiki. http://wiki.zope.org/zope3/SessionCredentialsAPIEnhancements I have checked in an example implementation to the Zope SVN repository. The code is at:

[Zope-dev] Re: Field for blobs?

2008-04-15 Thread Martijn Faassen
Hi there, Christian Zagrodnick wrote: I'd need a zope.schema field for blobs. Should this go directly to zope.schema or some third party package? Something like bla = zope.schema.Blob(title=...) would be nice to have. If you mean using blobs for file storage, see megrok.form, which in

Re: [Zope-dev] Exception verbosity in CA

2008-04-15 Thread Chris McDonough
Malthe Borch wrote: Some motivation: File .../zope/interface/adapter.py, line 482, in queryMultiAdapter result = factory(*objects) TypeError: __init__() takes exactly 2 arguments (3 given) Perhaps the need for introspection tools would not be so immediate if the exceptions were

[Zope-dev] Re: Five and browser-oriented components

2008-04-15 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Martijn Faassen wrote: Alexander Limi wrote: On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:11:11 -0700, Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *IF* you'd like to be pragmatic, I'd suggest we clean up those failing Plone tests, merge the branch and be on our way. This gets back to Hanno's suggestion