Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Mon Apr 21 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Tue Apr 22 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Mon Apr 21 20:58:34 EDT 2008
URL:
Hi there,
I just found out about this site:
http://www.blueskyonmars.com/projects/paver/
I know that the author has used buildout in the past. He apparently
decided to roll his own.
I have no idea what the technical qualities of paver are. To get your
attention, let me spell out a strongly
From Kevin's blog
http://www.blueskyonmars.com/2008/04/22/paver-and-the-building-distribution-deployment-etc-of-python-projects/
(http://tinyurl.com/68sz6u)
The idea is to use zc.buildout's machinery, not reinvent it.
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Hi.
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
I'd like to propose to merge the philikon-aq branch into Zope trunk aka
Zope 2.12.
[...]
Timeline:
I would like to do the merge as soon as possible, so people can easily
test it against all their applications and report back problems.
Just as a note for
I'm getting a Traceback when running `python setup.py test` for
ZConfig-2.5.1 as per the changelog. Attached is the output, let me know
how I can help. I'm not a proficient python programmer; however, I'm
more than willing to learn more.
--Tim
Kent Tenney wrote:
From Kevin's blog
http://www.blueskyonmars.com/2008/04/22/paver-and-the-building-distribution-deployment-etc-of-python-projects/
(http://tinyurl.com/68sz6u)
The idea is to use zc.buildout's machinery, not reinvent it.
I agree, it sounds like Kevin wants to take the best
Martijn Faassen wrote:
You Can Save Buildout!
So, who is up to make a nice clean looking website and a few tutorials
for buildout? It needs a website. Buildout has been around for a few
years without a proper website already, Paver for 5 minutes and it's got
one. I'm not going to do it, but
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Timothy Selivanow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting a Traceback when running `python setup.py test` for
ZConfig-2.5.1 as per the changelog. Attached is the output, let me know
how I can help. I'm not a proficient python programmer; however, I'm
more
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 19:44 -0400, Fred Drake wrote:
Can you provide the traceback?
It's in the attached file at the bottom. I didn't put it in the body of
the email 'cause the total output is ~14kB and includes *all* the output
from running the tests (so it also shows the last good test that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fred Drake wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Timothy Selivanow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting a Traceback when running `python setup.py test` for
ZConfig-2.5.1 as per the changelog. Attached is the output, let me know
how I can
The Paver site seems based on the doc generation thing that the new docs on
python.org use.
Sphinx is the doc generation thing, it's really nice, takes ReST files and
creates TOC, indexes, provides search, all from an attractive front page.
If a tiny bit of markup was added to the existing
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 7:57 PM, Timothy Selivanow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's the Traceback in case someone is interested in just it (I don't
think it's useful because it's the unittest module that raises the
error...but that's just me ;)
What's odd is that there's nothing from ZConfig
--On 22. April 2008 17:14:49 -0600 Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Kent Tenney wrote:
From Kevin's blog
http://www.blueskyonmars.com/2008/04/22/paver-and-the-building-distribut
ion-deployment-etc-of-python-projects/ (http://tinyurl.com/68sz6u)
The idea is to use zc.buildout's
13 matches
Mail list logo
