Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
I just found out about this site:
http://www.blueskyonmars.com/projects/paver/
I know that the author has used buildout in the past. He apparently
decided to roll his own.
I have no idea what the technical qualities of paver are. To get your
attention,
I'd like to announce that the SchoolTool project has finished packaging
a large proportion of the Zope 3 stack as separate Debian packages based
on the setuptools tarballs from the KGS.
The current development version of schooltool runs against this stack
which includes most Zope 3.4 packages
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 08:19:55AM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi,
I asked already six weeks ago about the schedule for the final 3.4 release
and got no reply so far. So once again the same question...how is in charge
for doing the 3.4 release?
I'm afraid nobody really is in charge
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:00:15PM +0530, Baiju M wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Our company (ZeOmega) is willing to volunteer to do this work.
Jeff Rush, who presented a tutorial about Buildout in last PyCon
will be helping us to create this site [1].
Cool!
I think it is better not to
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:37:10AM +0200, Christophe Combelles wrote:
Lennart Regebro a écrit :
Microsites, microsites, microsites!
If there are lots of people wanting to set up a bunch of microsites, I
agree it would be better to have them.
However, the site is needed for a long time
Christian Theune a écrit :
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 08:19:55AM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi,
I asked already six weeks ago about the schedule for the final 3.4 release
and got no reply so far. So once again the same question...how is in charge
for doing the 3.4 release?
I'm afraid
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:29:22AM +0200, Christophe Combelles wrote:
Christian Theune a écrit :
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 08:19:55AM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi,
I asked already six weeks ago about the schedule for the final 3.4 release
and got no reply so far. So once again the same
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 08:58:28AM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
I'd like to announce that the SchoolTool project has finished packaging
a large proportion of the Zope 3 stack as separate Debian packages based
on the setuptools tarballs from the KGS.
The current development version of
Christian Theune a écrit :
Well. If there are updates that we want to be in the release (from your list
zope.app.locales counts AFAICT) we need to do another release candidate. If
we'd be good to release 3.4.0 right away, then there can't be any changes from
the release candidate. (Getting minor
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:14:56AM +0200, Christophe Combelles wrote:
Christian Theune a écrit :
Well. If there are updates that we want to be in the release (from your list
zope.app.locales counts AFAICT) we need to do another release candidate. If
we'd be good to release 3.4.0 right away,
Hi there,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Baiju M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Our company (ZeOmega) is willing to volunteer to do this work.
Jeff Rush, who presented a tutorial about Buildout in last PyCon
will be helping us to create this site [1].
Great! [we already had some private
Hi there,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I think it is better not to associate Buildout with zope.org domain.
So, either we can create a new domain www.buildout.org
or if you all agree a subdomain of python.org : buildout.python.org
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:45:16PM +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I think it is better not to associate Buildout with zope.org domain.
So, either we can create a new domain
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Tue Apr 22 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Wed Apr 23 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Tue Apr 22 20:59:15 EDT 2008
URL:
Hi there,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[buildout.org versus buildout.zope.org]
Agreed, we shouldn't hide ourselves. I think *.python.org is a step
too far. What I do think is that it's good to let projects that *do*
stand on their own stand
Christian Theune a écrit :
True. Considering that the current zope.org effort hopefully won't die (when
are we going to go live? Is there something like a check list or road map?)
I will be working on it for 3 days at the Paris sprint
Hope I will succeed in doing something useful...
Right.
Hi there,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Christophe Combelles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I personally think we *must* introduce buildout somewhere in zope.org, but
if someone also build a more complete separate site (with potentially a
queriable repository of recipes), it's ok, and
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 01:10:19PM +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
I'm on the fence on this one. I think as long as the site *says* it's
affiliated with the Zope project, the Zope community and the
foundation, we're fine. You can argue both directions here: we might
even *help* send the
Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 01:10:19PM +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
I'm on the fence on this one. I think as long as the site *says* it's
affiliated with the Zope project, the Zope community and the
foundation, we're fine. You can argue both directions here: we might
Hi there,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I still have the feeling we should spend time getting our story straight. For
example: Why is zc.buildout a Zope project? The new site starts talking
about the Zope libraries which people started
Hey,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Anyway, I'm not sure how produce it is to go into discussions like
this either.
Um, 'productive', not 'produce'. :)
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
Kent Tenney wrote:
From Kevin's blog
http://www.blueskyonmars.com/2008/04/22/paver-and-the-building-distribution-deployment-etc-of-python-projects/
(http://tinyurl.com/68sz6u)
Very interesting. I hadn't seen that. I wonder *how* it is using
buildout's machinery.
Regards,
Martijn
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Kent Tenney wrote:
From Kevin's blog
http://www.blueskyonmars.com/2008/04/22/paver-and-the-building-distribution-deployment-etc-of-python-projects/
(http://tinyurl.com/68sz6u)
Very interesting. I hadn't seen that. I wonder *how* it is using
buildout's machinery.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 01:28:35PM +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
[...good pointers...]
Anyway, I'm not sure how produce it is to go into discussions like
this either. I'd rather not distract people from actually producing
useful websites. :)
It's definitely not productive in the way that it
Hey Christian,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 01:28:35PM +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
[...good pointers...]
Anyway, I'm not sure how produce it is to go into discussions like
this either. I'd rather not distract
Hey,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 01:46:01PM +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
I'm sorry, I didn't mean to offend. You ask good questions and you
make good comments.
I just keep repeating this as it's just too easy to get into a what
color should the bikeshed be discussion about naming and meaning.
Hey Christian,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 01:46:01PM +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
I'm sorry, I didn't mean to offend. You ask good questions and you
make good comments.
I just keep repeating this as it's just
On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Brian Sutherland wrote:
I'd like to announce that the SchoolTool project has finished packaging
a large proportion of the Zope 3 stack as separate Debian packages based
on the setuptools tarballs from the KGS.
Okay, so I think we should use the KGS and declare the set
Hi,
if there are no objections I'll do bugfixes releases for Zope 2.9 and 2.10
around May 11th. So fix what you have to fix in advance :-)
Andreas
pgpFxSb2U5HM0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
- Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Baiju M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Our company (ZeOmega) is willing to volunteer to do this work.
Jeff Rush, who presented a tutorial about Buildout in last PyCon
will be helping us to
Hi All,
lots of small talk follows, scroll down to section for the main
point of this email
I guess I have officially volunteered to write content for the new
zope.org site in the zope 3 section. Part of that involves describing
what zope 3 is in a concise manner. I realize there are
Hi Paul,
I guess I have officially volunteered to write content for the new
zope.org site in the zope 3 section. Part of that involves describing
what zope 3 is in a concise manner. I realize there are probably a
lot of different opinions about what zope 3 is, so I would like to
solicit the
Hi!
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 03:49:07PM -0700, Timothy Selivanow wrote:
I'm getting a Traceback when running `python setup.py test` for
ZConfig-2.5.1 as per the changelog. Attached is the output, let me know
how I can help. I'm not a proficient python programmer; however, I'm
more than
Paul Carduner a écrit :
* THE POINT OF THIS EMAIL IS BELOW *
I would like to develop a buildout recipe that generates aggregated
documentation for a package (like z3c.form) using sphynx and publishes
it to the new zope.org website. I want updating of zope documentation
on zope.org to
Marius Gedminas a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 08:36:09AM -0700, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Brian Sutherland wrote:
I'd like to announce that the SchoolTool project has finished packaging
a large proportion of the Zope 3 stack as separate Debian packages based
on the
Suppose I find a bug (say, zope.testing.testrunner.StartUpFailure
objects make unittest.TextTestRunner cry). Being a good developer I
want to start the bug fix with a unit test.
Now if zope.testing used old-style isolated unit tests, I could open the
tests.py (or tests/test_testrunner.py) in a
Can't you start a plain-old unittests module and stick your test in
there? Is there any rule that says you cannot create a plain-old test
module if the project you are fixing the bug in uses doctests?
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Marius Gedminas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suppose I find a bug
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 09:44:45PM +0200, Christophe Combelles wrote:
Paul Carduner a écrit :
* THE POINT OF THIS EMAIL IS BELOW *
I would like to develop a buildout recipe that generates aggregated
documentation for a package (like z3c.form) using sphynx and publishes
it to the new
On Apr 23, 2008, at 4:19 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
Suppose I find a bug (say, zope.testing.testrunner.StartUpFailure
objects make unittest.TextTestRunner cry). Being a good developer I
want to start the bug fix with a unit test.
Now if zope.testing used old-style isolated unit tests, I
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I disagree. Very much. Note that we are not forcing everyone to use this
new site; it is perfectly possible for projects to setup their own site.
And in that case we end up with two sites, one on Zope.org, and it's
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Christophe Combelles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So let's just build a first nice zope.org with subfolders explaining the
different projects because it's important to have just *something*. At
least.
Sure, that's fine. But that's just one page of explanation,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 05:22:29PM -0300, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Can't you start a plain-old unittests module and stick your test in
there? Is there any rule that says you cannot create a plain-old test
module if the project you are fixing the bug in uses doctests?
I'll probably do that (since
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Christophe Combelles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Carduner a écrit :
* THE POINT OF THIS EMAIL IS BELOW *
I would like to develop a buildout recipe that generates aggregated
documentation for a package (like z3c.form) using sphynx and publishes
Martins answer doens't seem to have arrived here, so sorry for the
weird quoting:
On 21 Apr 2008, at 11:53 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
Does it really matter whether a microsite lives in
zope.org/projects/zodb or zodb.zope.org?
As mentioned, no.But it's important that it is it's own site, running
Marius Gedminas a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 09:48:45PM +0200, Christophe Combelles wrote:
Marius Gedminas a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 08:36:09AM -0700, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Brian Sutherland wrote:
I'd like to announce that the SchoolTool project has
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Christophe Combelles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So let's just build a first nice zope.org with subfolders explaining the
different projects because it's important to have just *something*. At
least.
Sure, that's fine. But that's just
Lennart Regebro wrote:
Martins answer doens't seem to have arrived here, so sorry for the
weird quoting:
On 21 Apr 2008, at 11:53 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
Does it really matter whether a microsite lives in
zope.org/projects/zodb or zodb.zope.org?
As mentioned, no.But it's important that it is
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Marius Gedminas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suppose I find a bug (say, zope.testing.testrunner.StartUpFailure
objects make unittest.TextTestRunner cry). Being a good developer I
want to start the bug fix with a unit test.
...
I still maintain that:
*
Paul Carduner wrote:
consumption than others). Few people know about this because the
documentation is not aggregated anywhere (except for some bits on
apidoc.zope.org).
Not so! I recently did this at http://wiki.zope.org/zope3 . I hope it
helps you.
Hi there,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Baiju M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
OK, we decided to go ahead with this work. And we will be using
a subdomain of zope.org and it will be hosted using ZF server
infrastructure. I will contact Jens once content and site is ready.
Great! To
- Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Baiju M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
OK, we decided to go ahead with this work. And we will be using
a subdomain of zope.org and it will be hosted using ZF server
infrastructure. I will
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 09:58:02PM +0100, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Christophe Combelles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So let's just build a first nice zope.org with subfolders explaining the
different projects because it's important to have
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 04:47:59PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Apr 23, 2008, at 4:47 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
...
The point of my message was not to whine
about the state of zope.testing, but to present a new argument against
the current fashion of using plain-text narrative doctests
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Paul,
I've tried to sum up my understanding of how Zope 3 fits in with the Zope
universe here:
http://zode01.lovelysystems.com/projects
Beyond that, I think Zope 3 is becoming more and more a collection of
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Christophe Combelles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Paul Carduner a écrit :
* THE POINT OF THIS EMAIL IS BELOW *
I would like to develop a buildout recipe that generates aggregated
documentation for a package (like z3c.form) using sphynx and
55 matches
Mail list logo