[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 4 OK, 1 Failed

2008-05-31 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Fri May 30 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Sat May 31 11:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests. Test failures - Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Fri May 30 21:07:45 EDT

Re: [Zope-dev] zope 3 component binaries for Python 2.5 on Windows

2008-05-31 Thread Chris Withers
Lennart Regebro wrote: On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:03 AM, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where do I go to get windows binaries installers or similar for these? (ie: the C-components) Well, what I did for Zope 2 was to use Tareks buildout for Windows package. It's for Python 2.4, but in

[Zope-dev] Re: [Repoze-dev] Somebody needs to talk at EuropPython.

2008-05-31 Thread Chris Withers
Godefroid Chapelle wrote: I think Lennart is really hitting a nail here. We need to advertize about our great efforts. I wont be in EuroPython even if I would have spoken about it with pleasure. I am planning on going and would be happy to talk but I'm not sure I know enough on these

[Zope-dev] Re: SVN: zc.datetimewidget/trunk/ prepare for a sanitizing release, thanks to a wild svn-based release

2008-05-31 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fred Drake wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Fred L. Drake, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Log message for revision 87005: prepare for a sanitizing release, thanks to a wild svn-based release ... CHANGES === +0.6.1 (2008-05-29)

[Zope-dev] Re: SVN: relstorage/branches/1.1/MANIFEST apparently, setuptools uses SOURCES.txt instead of MANIFEST

2008-05-31 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Shane Hathaway wrote: Log message for revision 87068: apparently, setuptools uses SOURCES.txt instead of MANIFEST It generates that file in the .egg-info subdirectory when building an 'sdist' from a VCS checkout (subversion or another with the

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: SVN: zc.datetimewidget/trunk/ prepare for a sanitizing release, thanks to a wild svn-based release

2008-05-31 Thread Benji York
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dead-horse beat=sans-merci If we quit keeping guessed nex version number on the trunk (or on release branches), such a release would be harder to make. Also, we wouldn't have to make unneeded changes to setup.py on the