Re: [Zope-dev] Deprecate ITerms in zope.app.form? [Re:zope.browser?]

2009-01-07 Thread Christian Zagrodnick
On 2008-12-22 18:48:47 +0100, "Martijn Faassen" said: > Hi there, > > All right, I was getting a bit confused when it appeared you were > arguing against moving things at all, but you're basically in favor of > leaving the old APIs intact without explicitly breaking them. > > I think we need to

Re: [Zope-dev] Deprecate ITerms in zope.app.form? [Re:zope.browser?]

2009-01-07 Thread Roger Ineichen
Hi Christian > Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] Deprecate ITerms in zope.app.form? > [Re:zope.browser?] > > On 2008-12-22 18:48:47 +0100, "Martijn Faassen" > said: > > > Hi there, > > > > All right, I was getting a bit confused when it appeared you were > > arguing against moving things at all, bu

[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 6 OK

2009-01-07 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Jan 6 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed Jan 7 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.7 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Jan 6 20:29:22 EST 2009 URL: http://m

[Zope-dev] Release zc.selenium on pypi

2009-01-07 Thread Christian Zagrodnick
Hi, there is zc.selenium on svn.zope.org which is not on pypi. Could this be released? Also it speaks of the ZVLS in some files which doesn't seem to be correct. -- Christian Zagrodnick · c...@gocept.com gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com

Re: [Zope-dev] Release zc.selenium on pypi

2009-01-07 Thread Benji York
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Christian Zagrodnick wrote: > there is zc.selenium on svn.zope.org which is not on pypi. Could this > be released? Yes. > Also it speaks of the ZVLS in some files which doesn't > seem to be correct. It's not correct. They should all be ZPL. -- Benji York Senior

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.selenium/trunk/src/zc/selenium/resources/scripts/user-extensions.js re-added comment action (which was lost by the selenium upgrade I think).

2009-01-07 Thread Benji York
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Christian Zagrodnick wrote: > Log message for revision 94571: > re-added comment action (which was lost by the selenium upgrade I think). Can you think of a test that would have prevented this? It's somewhat difficult with the nature of Selenium and its extension

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.selenium/trunk/src/zc/selenium/resources/scripts/user-extensions.js re-added comment action (which was lost by the selenium upgrade I think).

2009-01-07 Thread Benji York
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Christian Zagrodnick wrote: > > On 07.01.2009, at 14:34, Benji York wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Christian Zagrodnick >> wrote: >>> >>> Log message for revision 94571: >>> re-added comment action (which was lost by the selenium upgrade I think). >> >