Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12

2009-01-25 Thread Dieter Maurer
Andreas Jung wrote at 2009-1-21 14:55 +0100: ... TARGET=Python 2.6.X ACCEPTABLE=Python 2.5 Python 2.4.X would be basically not acceptable but could be used at your own risk using the --with-python option. ... - - removing ZClasses completely But hopefully provided by a separate

Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12

2009-01-25 Thread Dieter Maurer
Chris Withers wrote at 2009-1-22 09:38 +: ... One thing that myself and Shane talked briefly about on this list was re-implementing the AST manipulation as dissallow-by-default filter rather than a straight manipulation. That way, unexpected stuff should be allowed by default. The terms

Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12

2009-01-25 Thread Dieter Maurer
Hanno Schlichting wrote at 2009-1-23 19:36 +0100: Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously Tres Seaver wrote: Andreas Jung wrote: - removing ZClasses completely This is done now. Wow. This was quick! Much quicker than fixing bugs reported in the collector :-( -- Dieter

Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12

2009-01-25 Thread Andreas Jung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25.01.2009 12:44 Uhr, Dieter Maurer wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote at 2009-1-23 19:36 +0100: Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously Tres Seaver wrote: Andreas Jung wrote: - removing ZClasses completely This is done now. Wow. This was quick!

Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12

2009-01-25 Thread Dieter Maurer
Andreas Jung wrote at 2009-1-25 10:21 +0100: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25.01.2009 9:27 Uhr, Dieter Maurer wrote: Andreas Jung wrote at 2009-1-21 14:55 +0100: ... TARGET=Python 2.6.X ACCEPTABLE=Python 2.5 Python 2.4.X would be basically not acceptable but could be

[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 8 OK

2009-01-25 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sat Jan 24 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sun Jan 25 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.7 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sat Jan 24 20:54:41 EST 2009 URL:

Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12

2009-01-25 Thread Dieter Maurer
Andreas Jung wrote at 2009-1-25 12:53 +0100: ... - removing ZClasses completely This is done now. Wow. This was quick! Much quicker than fixing bugs reported in the collector :-( Please stop bitching and fix your favorite bugs in the collector. You have svn commit right *wink* I will

Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12

2009-01-25 Thread Andreas Jung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25.01.2009 12:56 Uhr, Dieter Maurer wrote: Andreas Jung wrote at 2009-1-25 10:21 +0100: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25.01.2009 9:27 Uhr, Dieter Maurer wrote: Andreas Jung wrote at 2009-1-21 14:55 +0100: ...

Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12

2009-01-25 Thread Martijn Pieters
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 12:56, Dieter Maurer die...@handshake.de wrote: I plan to provide such a package as dm.ZClasses or (maybe) Zope2.ZClasses -- of course with some complaints against the Zope release management in the documentation: * cutting away useful features without any serious

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: relstorage/trunk/ Corporation - Foundation

2009-01-25 Thread Benji York
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Shane Hathaway sh...@hathawaymix.org wrote: Log message for revision 94997: Corporation - Foundation AFAIK, the IP hasn't been transfered yet. I'm not sure what the implications of using Foundation are at this point. Changed: U

Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12

2009-01-25 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Andreas Jung wrote: On 21.01.2009 14:55 Uhr, Andreas Jung wrote: - complete eggification (apparently pretty much done) I tried to make an old-style full-tarball release yesterday and ran into a problem. The setup.py in the created tarball references the 'src' folder in some steps, which isn't

Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12

2009-01-25 Thread Laurence Rowe
Andreas Jung wrote: - complete eggification (apparently pretty much done) We have to define what eggification means exactly. By now the Zope2.buildout seems to work fine with Python 2.4-2.6. I think we want to see Zope2 being easy_install-able. This means basically: - a source code

Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12

2009-01-25 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Laurence Rowe wrote: It's possible to have egg dependencies on development versions of other eggs so long as there is an svn egg link on the pypi page. For example in zope.sqlalchemy's pypi page I include a link like to:

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: relstorage/trunk/ Corporation - Foundation

2009-01-25 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Benji York wrote: On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Shane Hathaway sh...@hathawaymix.org wrote: Log message for revision 94997: Corporation - Foundation AFAIK, the IP hasn't been transfered yet. I'm not sure what the implications of using

Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12

2009-01-25 Thread Dieter Maurer
Martijn Pieters wrote at 2009-1-25 13:29 +0100: On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 12:56, Dieter Maurer die...@handshake.de wrote: I plan to provide such a package as dm.ZClasses or (maybe) Zope2.ZClasses -- of course with some complaints against the Zope release management in the documentation: *

Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12

2009-01-25 Thread Andreas Jung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25.01.2009 20:09 Uhr, Dieter Maurer wrote: Martijn Pieters wrote at 2009-1-25 13:29 +0100: On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 12:56, Dieter Maurer die...@handshake.de wrote: I plan to provide such a package as dm.ZClasses or (maybe) Zope2.ZClasses -- of

Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12

2009-01-25 Thread Dieter Maurer
Andreas Jung wrote at 2009-1-25 20:19 +0100: ... Please stop the discussion. The majority of Zope developers considers the ZClasses programming model as not up2date and not flexible enough when it comes to extensibility and scalability. That's why we don't want ZClasses being part of Zope 2

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: relstorage/trunk/ Corporation - Foundation

2009-01-25 Thread Shane Hathaway
Benji York wrote: On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Shane Hathaway sh...@hathawaymix.org wrote: Log message for revision 94997: Corporation - Foundation AFAIK, the IP hasn't been transfered yet. I'm not sure what the implications of using Foundation are at this point. Even so, I have no

[Zope-dev] CSRF/XSS: zope.formlib

2009-01-25 Thread Sidnei da Silva
Hello all, I've been looking at the way CSRF protection is done in Plone (plone.protect, using a @protect decorator), and also at the XSS protection added to Zope (@postonly decorator) and was wondering if something more generic could possibly be done for zope.formlib-based forms, instead of

Re: [Zope-dev] Plans for Zope 2.12

2009-01-25 Thread Andreas Jung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25.01.2009 20:34 Uhr, Dieter Maurer wrote: Andreas Jung wrote at 2009-1-25 20:19 +0100: ... Please stop the discussion. The majority of Zope developers considers the ZClasses programming model as not up2date and not flexible enough when it