Re: [Zope-dev] Tests results for Zope 3.5dev KGS

2009-02-09 Thread Brian Sutherland
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 10:52:01AM +0300, Dan Korostelev wrote: 2009/2/9 Dan Korostelev nad...@gmail.com: 2009/2/9 Stephan Richter srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu: Anyone, how close are we to a z3c.form 2.0 release? I worked on the multi widget a little some time ago, adding conditional

Re: [Zope-dev] Tests results for Zope 3.5dev KGS

2009-02-09 Thread Christophe Combelles
Stephan Richter a écrit : On Sunday 08 February 2009, Christophe Combelles wrote: For now I only have the py2.5-64bit slave, but I have similar results, though less tests: http://zope3.afpy.org/buildbot/ 12895 tests, 27 failures, 10 errors I'll add other slaves soon (32bit and py2.6).

[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 7 OK, 1 Failed

2009-02-09 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Feb 8 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Feb 9 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Test failures - Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.5.4 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Feb 8

Re: [Zope-dev] multiple packages in the same namespace

2009-02-09 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dieter Maurer wrote: Christian Theune wrote at 2009-2-7 09:36 +0100: ... According to the setuptools documentation and our experiments on the sprint, this is supposed to work and does work: When you declare a package to be a namespace package,

Re: [Zope-dev] Planning for Zope 3.5

2009-02-09 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hermann Himmelbauer wrote: Am Sonntag 01 Februar 2009 07:51:43 schrieb Stephan Richter: Hi all, now that we have Zope 3.4.0 finally behind us, let's look forward. As I said in the release notes, I am really willing to switch to a 6 months

Re: [Zope-dev] Tests results for Zope 3.5dev KGS

2009-02-09 Thread Stephan Richter
On Monday 09 February 2009, Brian Sutherland wrote: Oh, also, I guess it should use z3c.ptcompat rather than z3c.pt.compat for z3c.pt thing. I have a branch for that, but am blocked on merging that because the z3c.ptcompat code has test failures (in itself and z3c.form). These test

Re: [Zope-dev] Tests results for Zope 3.5dev KGS

2009-02-09 Thread Stephan Richter
On Sunday 08 February 2009, Dan Korostelev wrote: I think, I'll try to make a review of current z3c.form's state and write more on that. Thanks a lot! Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter Web Software Design, Development and Training Google me. Zope Stephan Richter

Re: [Zope-dev] ZCML implementations: where should they go

2009-02-09 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martijn Faassen wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote: [snip] Anything you'd actually be +1 on? :) I haven't figured out yet, what I'd like to do with ZCML and zope.configuration in general. It seems to me that ZCML is right now too tightly bound to

Re: [Zope-dev] ZCML implementations: where should they go

2009-02-09 Thread Martijn Faassen
Hey, Tres Seaver wrote: [snip] repoze.bfg takes yet another approach. I'm sure there are new ZCML directives it introduces, but it also forked the current ZCML directives that are in zope.component for basic component registration, to reduce its dependencies. Perhaps that fork can be

[Zope-dev] opensp...@pycon 2009 about Zope/Repoze/Grok/Deliverence etc.

2009-02-09 Thread Lennart Regebro
Lots of things have happened in the Zope universe the last couple of years, and are still happening, some of which are turning Zope inside out, from a monolithic ghetto to a componentized agile speed monster. People outside the Zope world doesn't know about it, and although the Zope community

Re: [Zope-dev] ZCML implementations: where should they go

2009-02-09 Thread Adam GROSZER
Hello, Monday, February 9, 2009, 5:58:34 PM, you wrote: The fork is not merely to reduce dependencies: BFG also wants to eliminate the requirement that there be one global component registry to rule them all, which is pretty deeply embedded in zope.component. Breaking that assumption allows

Re: [Zope-dev] Tests results for Zope 3.5dev KGS

2009-02-09 Thread Brian Sutherland
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 07:28:11AM -0800, Stephan Richter wrote: On Monday 09 February 2009, Brian Sutherland wrote: Oh, also, I guess it should use z3c.ptcompat rather than z3c.pt.compat for z3c.pt thing. I have a branch for that, but am blocked on merging that because the

[Zope-dev] z3c.form 2.0

2009-02-09 Thread Dan Korostelev
So here's a little review on current status of z3c.form. Mostly based on items from CHANGES.txt for 2.0 release :) I may forget something, so I'll reply to myself if something suddenly comes in my mind. And sorry for my English, i'm quite in hurry now. :-) FileWidget - It doesn't clear the bytes

Re: [Zope-dev] opensp...@pycon 2009 about Zope/Repoze/Grok/Deliverence etc.

2009-02-09 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Lennart Regebro wrote: So, I propose to have an Open Space session at PyCon, Chicago, March 27-29 . Sounds good. Count me in. Hanno P.S. Yes, I'm at PyCon this year ;) ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org

Re: [Zope-dev] opensp...@pycon 2009 about Zope/Repoze/Grok/Deliverence etc.

2009-02-09 Thread Gary Poster
On Feb 9, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote: Lots of things have happened in the Zope universe the last couple of years, and are still happening, some of which are turning Zope inside out, from a monolithic ghetto to a componentized agile speed monster. People outside the Zope world

Re: [Zope-dev] opensp...@pycon 2009 about Zope/Repoze/Grok/Deliverence etc.

2009-02-09 Thread Andreas Jung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09.02.2009 20:18 Uhr, Hanno Schlichting wrote: Lennart Regebro wrote: So, I propose to have an Open Space session at PyCon, Chicago, March 27-29 . Sounds good. Count me in. Will be there as well. Andreas -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

[Zope-dev] Translations for zope packages.

2009-02-09 Thread Dan Korostelev
Nowadays, when we have a fully egg-based setup, the translations in the zope.app.locales package make no sense anymore as it's very hard to maintain them and it just wrong (to me at least) to have a separate centralized translations package for a hundred of eggs. The zope.i18n = 3.5.0 have a

Re: [Zope-dev] z3c.form 2.0

2009-02-09 Thread Stephan Richter
On Monday 09 February 2009, Dan Korostelev wrote: FileWidget - It doesn't clear the bytes value if no new file is uploaded now, which is nice. But there's also should be a way to clear current value if the field is not required. I've added that to the TODOS.txt. I think that should be done

Re: [Zope-dev] Translations for zope packages.

2009-02-09 Thread Stephan Richter
On Monday 09 February 2009, Dan Korostelev wrote: Nowadays, when we have a fully egg-based setup, the translations in the zope.app.locales package make no sense anymore as it's very hard to maintain them and it just wrong (to me at least) to have a separate centralized translations package for

Re: [Zope-dev] Planning for Zope 3.5

2009-02-09 Thread Dan Korostelev
2009/2/9 Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com: I would rather move the Twisted support out into a non-core package, and focus on making the Zope3 components play nicely with *any* WSGI-compliant server. The fact that we still have a forked Twisted in Zope3 is directly tied to the absence of a

Re: [Zope-dev] Translations for zope packages.

2009-02-09 Thread Dan Korostelev
2009/2/10 Stephan Richter srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu: On Monday 09 February 2009, Dan Korostelev wrote: Nowadays, when we have a fully egg-based setup, the translations in the zope.app.locales package make no sense anymore as it's very hard to maintain them and it just wrong (to me at

Re: [Zope-dev] z3c.form 2.0

2009-02-09 Thread Dan Korostelev
2009/2/10 Stephan Richter srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu: On Monday 09 February 2009, Dan Korostelev wrote: FileWidget - It doesn't clear the bytes value if no new file is uploaded now, which is nice. But there's also should be a way to clear current value if the field is not required. I've

Re: [Zope-dev] Translations for zope packages.

2009-02-09 Thread Adam GROSZER
Hello Dan, In short, a good translation is consistent. That means the same sentences are translated to the same foreign sentence. A so-called translation memory is used for that. Also terms (specific words or expressions of the domain) are translated to the same foreign term. I think that's the