Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun May 10 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon May 11 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sun May 10 20:55:08 EDT 2009
URL: http://
Hey,
Chris McDonough wrote:
> Instead, I have argued for promoting packages that have some life of
> their own (independent of the rest of the pile) into subprojects that
> have their own release cycles.
> Then outside projects such as Plone and Grok could depend on
> independent versions o
Hey,
After reading this, I thought of one benefit that having a "larger"
package would have: it's somewhat easier to refactor for dependencies,
because all the code will be in a single checkout and all the tests can
be run together, and the fixed release can go out as a single release.
Having
A couple of things:
- If it helps to think of this thing as not-the-ZTK, that's fine. I don't care
what it's called. Maybe "the ZTK" is another package that depends on this big
thing plus all the broken out bits.
- There's very little work to doing this. You make an SVN directory that has
e
http://misc.buildbot.securactive.org/builders/zc.buildout-py2.4-32bit-linux/builds/1/steps/test/logs/stdio
http://misc.buildbot.securactive.org/builders/zc.buildout-py2.4-64bit-linux/builds/7/steps/test/logs/stdio
http://misc.buildbot.securactive.org/builders/zc.buildout-py2.6-32bit-linux/builds/0/
