On 10.06.09 18:10, Tres Seaver wrote:
>
>
> This is somewhat the same pattern as Andreas used to merge the ZPT
> implementations, I think. This effort could be the focus of a sprint
> team, if there was interest.
The better example is TXNG3 where the Zope 2 and Zope 3 parts were
completely refact
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tres Seaver wrote:
> I propose that we consider merging the two implementations, along the
> lines of the following:
>
> 1. Review the change history of the two codebases since the original
>fork, porting relevant changes from the Z2 indexes to t
On 2009-06-11, Christian Theune wrote:
> I see we have a grok sprint working towards grok 1.0 at the EP.
For those that haven't seen it:
http://reinout.vanrees.org/weblog/2009/06/09/grok-europython-sprint.html
> I'd like to spend my sprinting time on ZTK issues which currently
> include:
>
> -
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Jun 10 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Jun 11 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Wed Jun 10 20:45:44 EDT 2009
URL: http://
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
> Log message for revision 94907:
> backport r94905 to 2.10: Acquisition wrappers now correctly proxy
> `__iter__`.
>
>
> Changed:
> U Zope/branches/2.10/doc/CHANGES.txt
> U Zope/branches/2.10/lib/python/Acquisitio
On Jun 11, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>> It looking for the ZODBMountPoint object that Tarek refered to, I saw
>> that there is still a Mount module in the ZODB package. AFAIK, this
>> a fossil that never should h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> It looking for the ZODBMountPoint object that Tarek refered to, I saw
> that there is still a Mount module in the ZODB package. AFAIK, this
> a fossil that never should have been included in ZODB in the first
> place. I'm go
On 11.06.09 20:10, Tres Seaver wrote:
>
> > """
>
> This doctest is failing for me in an up-to-date checkout of the 2.10
> branch. Andreas, can you please investigate?
>
No failures for me with fresh 2.10 checkouts on Linux and Mac.
Andreas
begin:vcard
fn:Andreas Jung
n:Jung;Andreas
org:ZOPY
On Jun 2, 2009, at 7:04 PM, Miles Waller wrote:
...
> 3. ZRS
> If I'm right, ZRS still has a limitation in that there is a single
> server
> for writes.
Yup.
...
> Having read the factsheet, I'm a
> bit unsure as to how it is functionally different from ZeoRAID - can
> anyone
> explain?
I'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
> On 11.06.09 20:10, Tres Seaver wrote:
>>> """
>> This doctest is failing for me in an up-to-date checkout of the 2.10
>> branch. Andreas, can you please investigate?
>>
> No failures for me with fresh 2.10 checkouts on Linux
On 11.06.09 22:14, Tres Seaver wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
> > On 11.06.09 20:10, Tres Seaver wrote:
> >>> """
> >> This doctest is failing for me in an up-to-date checkout of the 2.10
> >> branch. Andreas, can you please investigate?
> >>
> > No failures for me with fresh 2.10 checkouts on
11 matches
Mail list logo
