Hi,
I have tried to install it on an windows: the egg for python 2.4
works, but the one for 2.6 fails with the following error:
Installed
d:\pythonfarms\python262\lib\site-packages\zope2-2.12.0-py2.6-win32.egg
Processing dependencies for Zope2==2.12.0
Searching for zope.container
Reading http://
Dragos Chirila wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have tried to install it on an windows: the egg for python 2.4
> works, but the one for 2.6 fails with the following error:
This is because there was no 2.6 binary egg.
I've just rolled one and uploaded it.
Can you try again and let me know how you go?
Chris
Hi,
Following an earlier discussion on this list, I've made changes to
zope.filerepresentation to incorporate two new interfaces, IRawReadFile
and IRawWriteFile. These allow file representation adapters which behave
like Python standard library 'file' objects. This in turn allows
implementatio
Am 05.10.09 11:49, schrieb Chris Withers:
> Dragos Chirila wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have tried to install it on an windows: the egg for python 2.4
>> works, but the one for 2.6 fails with the following error:
>>
> This is because there was no 2.6 binary egg.
>
> I've just rolled one and upl
Hi Chris,
The installation worked smoothly. Still, I had to modify something in
the site-packages\zope\interface\common\interfaces.py file :
try:
classImplements(OverflowWarning, IOverflowWarning)
except NameError:
pass # OverflowWarning was removed in Python 2.5
Otherwise, Zope wont sta
Dragos Chirila wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> The installation worked smoothly. Still, I had to modify something in
> the site-packages\zope\interface\common\interfaces.py file :
>
> try:
> classImplements(OverflowWarning, IOverflowWarning)
> except NameError:
> pass # OverflowWarning was removed
I took the steps:
- installed Python 2.6.2
- downloaded Zope2-2.12.0-py2.6-win32.egg
- ..\Scripts\easy_install.exe Zope2-2.12.0-py2.6-win32.egg
- create a zope instance with ..\Scripts\mkzopeinstance.exe
Is this the correct way, right?
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
> Dr
Dragos Chirila wrote:
> I took the steps:
>
> - installed Python 2.6.2
> - downloaded Zope2-2.12.0-py2.6-win32.egg
> - ..\Scripts\easy_install.exe Zope2-2.12.0-py2.6-win32.egg
> - create a zope instance with ..\Scripts\mkzopeinstance.exe
Try the virtualenv option here:
http://docs.zope.org/zope2
Hi.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> I'd very much like a release of this. :)
>
> Would anyone mind making a 3.5.1 release, or else give me PyPI rights so
> that I can do it myself.
I gave you owner rights for this package.
Hanno
__
Hello,
* 2009-10-05 12:15, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Would anyone mind making a 3.5.1 release, or else give me PyPI rights so
> that I can do it myself.
Shouldn't this be 3.6.0?
Best regards,
Fabio
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail
Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> Hello,
>
> * 2009-10-05 12:15, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> Would anyone mind making a 3.5.1 release, or else give me PyPI rights so
>> that I can do it myself.
>
> Shouldn't this be 3.6.0?
I don't care one way or the other. 3.6.0 is fine by me.
Martin
--
Author of `Pr
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
>> * 2009-10-05 12:15, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>>> Would anyone mind making a 3.5.1 release, or else give me PyPI rights so
>>> that I can do it myself.
>>
>> Shouldn't this be 3.6.0?
>
> I don't care one way or the othe
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Oct 4 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Oct 5 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sun Oct 4 20:50:56 EDT 2009
URL: http://
Thomas Lotze wrote:
> Having worked on and released new versions of a few ZTK packages recently,
> I'm tempted to update the ZTK KGS (ztk.cfg) accordingly now. However, as
> there doesn't seem to be an agreed process about this and in an attempt
> not to step on anyone's toes, I'd like to ask first
Chris,
You were right; I tried on a fresh Python 2.6.3 installation and it
worked - Zope instance started without errors.
Dragos
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
> Dragos Chirila wrote:
>>
>> I took the steps:
>>
>> - installed Python 2.6.2
>> - downloaded Zope2-2.12.0-py2.
Martijn Faassen wrote:
> So I'd propose the following development process:
>
> * developers can change the version numbers in the ZTK
>
> * if the compattests all run, they can check in
I'll go ahead and update the KGS with my proposed new versions then; if
someone experiences a problem with th
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Thomas Lotze wrote:
> I see two options:
>
> - make ztk.cfg available from zope.org (why docs.zope.org, btw?) under a
> versioned URL
>
> - release a ztk egg that depends on the exactly versioned packages
>
> The latter is probably the more reusable.
I'd suggest t
Hi,
In my travails through the ZPublisher and WebDAV, I've come up with
another fun thing.
As far as I can tell, traversal via acquisition doesn't make any sense
for a WebDAV request. If I have /foo and /bar, but not /bar/foo, then
traversal to /bar/foo over WebDAV should not acquire /foo and
Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my travails through the ZPublisher and WebDAV, I've come up with
> another fun thing.
>
> As far as I can tell, traversal via acquisition doesn't make any sense
> for a WebDAV request. If I have /foo and /bar, but not /bar/foo, then
> traversal to /bar/foo ove
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In my travails through the ZPublisher and WebDAV, I've come up with
>> another fun thing.
>>
>> As far as I can tell, traversal via acquisition doesn't make any sense
>> for a WebDAV request. If I have /foo and /bar, bu
(updating myself much much later)
Chris Withers wrote:
> yuppie wrote:
You ripped my sentence out of context. We were talking about Zope
2.12. And Zope 2.12 currently doesn't use buildout for setting up
instances.
>>> Sure it does. I've published the recipe. There's no more needed
Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> Can anyone explain why that condition is there? Otherwise, I'll rip it
>> out. ;-)
As I recall, this code is convoluted because it's hard to tell whether
an HTTP request is a WebDAV request. If there is now a way to clearly
distinguish WebDAV requests, then I imagine th
Shane Hathaway hathawaymix.org> writes:
>
> Martin Aspeli wrote:
> >> Can anyone explain why that condition is there? Otherwise, I'll rip it
> >> out.
>
> As I recall, this code is convoluted because it's hard to tell whether
> an HTTP request is a WebDAV request. If there is now a way to c
Thomas Lotze wrote:
> At present, zope.contenttype doesn't have any dependencies within the ZTK,
> and zope.mimetype depends on zope.configuration, zope.component and
> zope.interface. zope.publisher.contenttype doesn't import any zope code.
>
> - Switching packages that depend on zope.mimetype w
24 matches
Mail list logo
