Re: [Zope-dev] Uses of the ZTK and how it relates to management

2010-03-05 Thread Christian Theune
On 03/04/2010 11:35 AM, Hanno Schlichting wrote: On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote: A thought that came up when reading this paragraph: another option restructuring/grouping to reduce the amount of packages may be to join smaller packages with weird

Re: [Zope-dev] Summary of today's developer meeting

2010-03-05 Thread Christian Theune
Hi, On 03/04/2010 09:17 PM, Sebastien Douche wrote: On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 17:32, Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote: here's my first shot at a summary of today's meeting. I found the meeting itself very positive and energetic - thanks again to everyone who joined. The current state of

Re: [Zope-dev] Summary of today's developer meeting

2010-03-05 Thread Christian Theune
Hi, On 03/05/2010 02:56 AM, Baiju M wrote: Hi Sebastien, On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Sebastien Douche sdou...@gmail.com wrote: The current state of nightly builds is a bit untidy. According to http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html there's four buildbot installations

Re: [Zope-dev] Automating tests of the ZTK / zopeapp package sets

2010-03-05 Thread Christian Theune
Hi, I also looked at Hudson a few days ago and found it to be awesome. :) On 03/04/2010 10:10 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: After successfully configuring the Hudson[1] continuous integration server yesterday to test the various repoze.* packages[2], I thought I would experiment with using it to

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope3 sessions and database conflicts

2010-03-05 Thread Christian Theune
On 03/04/2010 11:08 PM, Ross Patterson wrote: Hermann Himmelbauer du...@qwer.tk writes: Hi, For quite some time I see messages like this in my z3.log: 2010-03-02T16:27:14 WARNING ZopePublication Competing writes/reads at

Re: [Zope-dev] Possible DateTime timezone-related regression in Zope 2.12

2010-03-05 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On 11.01.10 01:47, Martin Aspeli wrote: Laurence Rowe wrote: I believe the current behaviour is intentional to preserve backwards compatibility. See the discussion starting here: https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2007-October/030042.html Maybe it was 'fixed' on 2.10 branch some time

Re: [Zope-dev] Uses of the ZTK and how it relates to management

2010-03-05 Thread Christian Theune
On 03/04/2010 04:13 PM, Jim Fulton wrote: On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Fabio Tranchitella kob...@kobold.it wrote: * 2010-03-03 21:44, Jim Fulton wrote: The ZTK was created in part to deal with instability issues arising from people working on parts without testing the whole. I suppose

Re: [Zope-dev] Uses of the ZTK and how it relates to management

2010-03-05 Thread Christian Theune
Hi, On 03/04/2010 10:44 PM, Jim Fulton wrote: On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: Weird. Tres' mail didn't make it into gmane ... I'll fold my replies to Jim and Tres into this one mail. (Looks like I'm now turning into the one making noise here. I'm already

Re: [Zope-dev] Possible DateTime timezone-related regression in Zope 2.12

2010-03-05 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On 05.03.10 10:53, Andreas Zeidler wrote: also, look at the following (using `DateTime` 2.12): $ ~/plone/coredev/branches/4.0/bin/zopepy from DateTime import DateTime now = DateTime() now == DateTime(now) True now == DateTime(now.ISO()) False this is a _pretty_

Re: [Zope-dev] Possible DateTime timezone-related regression in Zope 2.12

2010-03-05 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On 05.03.10 11:10, Andreas Zeidler wrote: now == DateTime(now.ISO8601()) False now.ISO8601() '2010-03-05T11:06:09+01:00' unlike stated in `DateTime.interfaces` the string returned `ISO8601` method does not contain the time zone. oops, it does, of course (i think i'm still a bit

Re: [Zope-dev] Automating tests of the ZTK / zopeapp package sets

2010-03-05 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 04:10:29PM -0500, Tres Seaver wrote: After successfully configuring the Hudson[1] continuous integration server yesterday to test the various repoze.* packages[2], I thought I would experiment with using it to drive the compatibility tests for ZTK and zopeapp. Here is

[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 6 OK

2010-03-05 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Mar 4 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Fri Mar 5 12:00:00 2010 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Mar 4 20:37:17 EST 2010 URL:

[Zope-dev] ZTK compatibility testing

2010-03-05 Thread Christian Theune
Hi, as promised I'm currently trying to write down the instructions for running ZTK tests. I need some feedback on our process. I figured there are various scenarios for which we have tools: 1. Ensure that a branch of the ZTK stays in working order For that the ZTK has test runners created by

Re: [Zope-dev] ZTK compatibility testing

2010-03-05 Thread Jim Fulton
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote: ... 2b: ensuring ongoing compatibility of the trunks In addition I wonder how the various trunk versions of ZTK packages should relate to each other. Should they always build? Should we accept breakage of all trunks with

Re: [Zope-dev] Possible DateTime timezone-related regression in Zope 2.12

2010-03-05 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Aspeli wrote: Hi, We have a failing test in plone.app.dexterity 1.0a7. This is simply trying to compare two dates: from DateTime import DateTime DateTime() DateTime(md.CreationDate()) True At least here in

Re: [Zope-dev] Uses of the ZTK and how it relates to management

2010-03-05 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Theune wrote: On 03/04/2010 04:13 PM, Jim Fulton wrote: On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Fabio Tranchitella kob...@kobold.it wrote: * 2010-03-03 21:44, Jim Fulton wrote: The ZTK was created in part to deal with instability issues arising

Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: DateTime/trunk/src/DateTime/tests/testDateTime.py add a failing test for a regression in parsing ISO format datetimes from DateTime 2.10, as discussed at http://dev.plone.org/plone

2010-03-05 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Glick wrote: Log message for revision 109667: add a failing test for a regression in parsing ISO format datetimes from DateTime 2.10, as discussed at http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/10140 ...note that this will give a false positive if

Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: DateTime/trunk/src/DateTime/tests/testDateTime.py add a failing test for a regression in parsing ISO format datetimes from DateTime 2.10, as discussed at http://dev.plone.org/plone

2010-03-05 Thread Martin Aspeli
Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Glick wrote: Log message for revision 109667: add a failing test for a regression in parsing ISO format datetimes from DateTime 2.10, as discussed at http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/10140 ...note that this will