Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Fri Apr 30 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Sat May 1 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 19 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 12 from ccomb at free.fr, 1 from ct
at gocept.com.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.2 Linux 32bit
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 22:26, Fred Drake fdr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
Going from 1.2 to 1.3 is a minor new feature release.
Ok, if we're talking about changing the second number, this is fine.
The wording in a minor
Hi there,
In grokproject we would like to get rid of the zope.app.server
dependency. This is currently blocked by the zpasswd cmdline-tool
currently defined in z.a.server. We would like to provide this tool but
w/o z.a.server dependency.
Therefore I would like to move this script to
3.5.0 is released, but when I go to PyPI, I realize that the
description is very basic event system. I suggest we change that to
very awesome event system. :)
Does all you need, has no bugs. :-P
--
Lennart Regebro: Python, Zope, Plone, Grok
http://regebro.wordpress.com/
+33 661 58 14 64
Am 01.05.2010, 17:07 Uhr, schrieb Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com:
3.5.0 is released, but when I go to PyPI, I realize that the
description is very basic event system. I suggest we change that to
very awesome event system.
I wouldn't quite go that far. Simple, reliable synchronous event
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Uli Fouquet u...@gnufix.de wrote:
It would mean for zope.password to depend additionally on
zope.configuration and zope.component.
Are there any objections to this step?
No objection here. zope.password isn't used in Zope2 :)
Hanno
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 17:11, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
Am 01.05.2010, 17:07 Uhr, schrieb Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com:
3.5.0 is released, but when I go to PyPI, I realize that the
description is very basic event system. I suggest we change that to
very
Am 01.05.2010, 17:59 Uhr, schrieb Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com:
OK, maybe not awesome. But we should bang our drum more. I think
the popular word to use here might be lightweight.
Better than simple, definitely but not without its own connotations (what
English word, doesn't have them?
