Hi.
I released Zope 2.12.9 and Zope 2.13.0a2 today. Both contain a fix for
the missing browser:view permission support
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/578326). As this might affect
security of your applications, you are advised to upgrade. Zope 2
itself is not vulnerable. Thanks goes to
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Mon Jul 12 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Tue Jul 13 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 72 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 3 from buildbot at
enfoldsystems.com, 4 from buildbot at pov.lt, 17 from buildbot at
winbot.zope.org, 13 from ccomb at free.fr, 1 from ct at
Hi.
We have Python 2.7 final now and some work has begun on making ZTK
packages compatible with it. Currently we still see various test
failures in the zopeapp set though and nobody who steps up to fix
them.
Apart from that, we have made a promise to support Python 2.4 up to
2.6 for the ZTK 1.0
On Tuesday, July 13, 2010, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
What do others think about this?
Based on what you wrote, I think this is the right solution. Python 2.4 is
clearly important to the Zope 2 / Plone world.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Entrepreneur and Software Geek
Google me. Zope Stephan Richter
On Tuesday, July 13, 2010, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
In other news Zope 2.13.0a2 now officially supports Python 2.7.
How can Zope 2.13 support Python 2.7, when the ZTK 1.0 does not?
Regards,
Stephan
--
Entrepreneur and Software Geek
Google me. Zope Stephan Richter
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Stephan Richter
srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu wrote:
On Tuesday, July 13, 2010, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
What do others think about this?
Based on what you wrote, I think this is the right solution. Python 2.4 is
clearly important to the Zope 2 / Plone world.
Am 13.07.2010, 14:12 Uhr, schrieb Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu:
What do others think about this?
Hanno,
what's the time frame for ZTK 1.0?
From your previous mail there were three packages with test failures on
2.7. But I thought these were fixed?
I fixed all of those and released
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Stephan Richter
srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu wrote:
On Tuesday, July 13, 2010, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
In other news Zope 2.13.0a2 now officially supports Python 2.7.
How can Zope 2.13 support Python 2.7, when the ZTK 1.0 does not?
Zope 2.13 only uses the
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
what's the time frame for ZTK 1.0?
I put that info into the post scriptum of my mail.
Have I missed a mail with more failures? I would have thought getting
those tests to pass for a release is a reasonable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
what's the time frame for ZTK 1.0?
I put that info into the post scriptum of my mail.
Have I missed a mail with more failures? I
Hi,
The latest Zope 2.12.9 release broke the last release of Products.ZMySQLDA.
To demonstrate, bootstrap and run the attached buildout, then run:
$ bin/py -c import Shared.DC.ZRDB, Products.ZMySQLDA
You'll get the following traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File bin/py, line
Hi.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
The latest Zope 2.12.9 release broke the last release of Products.ZMySQLDA.
You are not by any chance interested in taking over maintenance of
ZSQLMethods, are you?
You'll get the following traceback:
On 07/13/2010 02:12 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Given all of these, I'm leaning towards not supporting Python 2.7 for
a ZTK 1.0 release. A 1.1 can drop Python 2.4 support and we can try to
support 2.7 in addition.
+1
For Zope standards we'd still be very fast with supporting Python 2.7 if
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
Given all of these, I'm leaning towards not supporting Python 2.7 for
a ZTK 1.0 release. A 1.1 can drop Python 2.4 support and we can try to
support 2.7 in addition.
We discussed this in todays zope-dev IRC meeting.
Am 13.07.2010, 17:44 Uhr, schrieb Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu:
You are not by any chance interested in taking over maintenance of
ZSQLMethods, are you?
As I've still got some stuff running on ZSQL and have previously
championed it I'll also wave a hand, although I'm not that familiar
Hi
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:44, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
[...]
You'll get the following traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File bin/py, line 107, in module
exec _val
File string, line 1, in module
File
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
And I'm not disagreeing with the policy, but it can be argued that
depending on the location of *data* files inside the Zope2 package is
not necessarily relying on guarantees on internals.
I'd call anything
On 2010-07-13 14:12:01 +0200, Hanno Schlichting said:
Hi.
We have Python 2.7 final now and some work has begun on making ZTK
packages compatible with it. Currently we still see various test
failures in the zopeapp set though and nobody who steps up to fix
them.
Apart from that, we have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
On 2010-07-13 14:12:01 +0200, Hanno Schlichting said:
Hi.
We have Python 2.7 final now and some work has begun on making ZTK
packages compatible with it. Currently we still see various test
failures in the zopeapp
On 2010-07-13 20:37:42 +0200, Tres Seaver said:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
On 2010-07-13 14:12:01 +0200, Hanno Schlichting said:
Hi.
We have Python 2.7 final now and some work has begun on making ZTK
packages compatible with it.
Am 13.07.2010, 20:48 Uhr, schrieb Christian Zagrodnick c...@gocept.com:
Actually I was thinking about the individual packages. I assume
dropping Python 2.4 should bump the respective package version at least
from 1.x.y to 1.x+1.0, right?
ZTK 1.1 will officially not support Python 2.6 but it
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:01:35AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
what's the time frame for ZTK 1.0?
I put that info into the post scriptum of my mail.
Have I missed a mail
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 14:46, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
And I'm not disagreeing with the policy, but it can be argued that
depending on the location of *data* files inside the Zope2 package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:01:35AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
what's the time frame for ZTK 1.0?
I put that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 13.07.2010, 20:48 Uhr, schrieb Christian Zagrodnick c...@gocept.com:
Actually I was thinking about the individual packages. I assume
dropping Python 2.4 should bump the respective package version at least
from 1.x.y to
25 matches
Mail list logo
