Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Jul 25 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Mon Jul 26 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 53 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 1 from buildbot at
enfoldsystems.com, 4 from buildbot at pov.lt, 13 from buildbot at
winbot.zope.org, 12 from ccomb at free.fr, 17 from jdrie
Hi
I think zope.index will not work for indexing simplified or traditional
Chinese. That is my observation of zope.index when I was working on
Plone4 CJK indexing. However by looking at SVN record of zope.indexing,
I see some changes. It could be working on Chinese, now.
(On Plone4 CJK indexin
On 7/26/10 14:52 , Manabu TERADA wrote:
> Hi
>
> I think zope.index will not work for indexing simplified or traditional
> Chinese. That is my observation of zope.index when I was working on
> Plone4 CJK indexing. However by looking at SVN record of zope.indexing,
> I see some changes. It could
...is currently useless, as far as I can see.
This stops you specifying a different location for runzope, which is
handy if you're doing buildout-based stuff that uses a deployment.
I think the attached patch fixes this, but I'm wondering:
- are these are tests for this area
- why does self.pr
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
> ...is currently useless, as far as I can see.
I thought the -p option was an artifact of zdaemon, which zopectl just
didn't support. I took it as a case of the lower level API's leaking
through.
> I think the attached patch fixes this, but