Hi All,
I'm in the process of egg-ifying some Zope 2 Products of mine (first up
is MailTemplates) and I'm curious as to how add-in products work in an
egg-based Zope setup.
Do I need to include anything in zope.conf or some zcml somewhere?
If not how are products picked up? Where can I find
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
I understand that. But it must be possible to do that programatically in
my code. I mean, setup.py --long-description obviously executes Python
code, which I may be able to execute myself in my current interpreter
session by importing and executing stuff from setuptools.
Hi.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
I'm in the process of egg-ifying some Zope 2 Products of mine (first up
is MailTemplates) and I'm curious as to how add-in products work in an
egg-based Zope setup.
Do I need to include anything in zope.conf or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Chris,
I've just been doing some build and release tools for a customer that
involve this sort of stuff, I resorted to:
snip lots of code
Yikes. Maybe the subshell isn't so bad after all :-P
jens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
For a general Python package to be picked up, you would need to add a
regular ZCML slug into the etc/package-includes directory of your
instance.
What does a regular ZCML slug look like?
If your package is a namespace package in the 'Products' namespace,
then it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/4/10 10:52 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Hi.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
I'm in the process of egg-ifying some Zope 2 Products of mine (first up
is MailTemplates) and I'm curious as to how
Hello Jens,
Something is wrong with the automatic update of
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/
Recent changes don't seem to show up.
--
Best regards,
Adam GROSZER mailto:agros...@gmail.com
--
Quote of the day:
For happiness one needs security, but joy can spring
Am 04.08.2010, 10:56 Uhr, schrieb Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org:
In essence: If your egg is in the Products namespace you don't need to
do anything after adding it e.g. to the list of eggs for a Zope instance
in your buildout.cfg. The product will be recognized, installed, and any
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
What does a regular ZCML slug look like?
My first Google hit is this
http://worldcookery.com/files/ploneconf05-five/step2.html :)
Is this setuptools namespace package magic making things work or is there
explicit
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
Am 04.08.2010, 10:56 Uhr, schrieb Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org:
In essence: If your egg is in the Products namespace you don't need to
do anything after adding it e.g. to the list of eggs for a Zope
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
What does a regular ZCML slug look like?
My first Google hit is this
http://worldcookery.com/files/ploneconf05-five/step2.html :)
yeah yeah...
Okay, but what about:
include
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Baiju M wrote:
zcml = simplistix.MailTemplates to your instance configuration and you're
good.
There is an assumption that plone.recipe.zope2instance [1] is used
to create instances from Buildout.
yes, which it
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Okay, but what about:
include package=Products.Whatever /
...causes Whatever/__init__.py's initialize method to get called?
Yes. Eggified products behave in the same way as code dumped into one
of the products
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
If you have a package, which isn't in the Products namespace and
still want its initialize to be called, you need to add some bits to
your configure.zcml:
five:registerPackage package=. initialize=.initialize /
Right, that's the bit I was after :-)
Chris
--
Am 04.08.2010, 11:15 Uhr, schrieb Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk:
yes, which it isn't for me, since it's evil and I'm not using Plone
Well, I said it was the idiot's guide...
As you know, I don't use Plone either. I'm also evil but in a different
way! The recipe just sets up a Zope 2
Charlie Clark wrote:
As you know, I don't use Plone either. I'm also evil but in a different
way! The recipe just sets up a Zope 2 instance, which I believe is a bit
tricky to work on all platforms.
It's a piece of piss and needs no special recipes:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/4/10 11:33 , Chris Withers wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
I've just been doing some build and release tools for a customer that
involve this sort of stuff, I resorted to:
snip lots of code
Yikes. Maybe the subshell isn't so bad after all :-P
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Tue Aug 3 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Wed Aug 4 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 42 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 1 from buildbot at
enfoldsystems.com, 4 from buildbot at pov.lt, 13 from buildbot at
winbot.zope.org, 8 from ccomb at free.fr, 10 from
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 11:09:58AM +0200, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 8/4/10 10:57 , Adam GROSZER wrote:
Hello Jens,
Something is wrong with the automatic update of
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/
Recent changes don't seem to show up.
I rebuilt it now. There's a check in a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/4/10 14:55 , Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 11:09:58AM +0200, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 8/4/10 10:57 , Adam GROSZER wrote:
Hello Jens,
Something is wrong with the automatic update of
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/4/10 17:26 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I'm wondering: can it be made to skip useless docs such as
http://docs.zope.org/zope.hookable/index.html, perhaps by checking for
linecount?
There are also a lot of packages that only have a changelog
On 8/4/10 17:38 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
IMHO trying to come up with some kind of programmatic algorithm to judge
a bit of documentation as good enough to show is insane. I'm not
going to attempt it.
Fair enough.
Maybe shitty (for some definition of shitty, as someone else would
say)
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 05:41:08PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 8/4/10 17:38 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
IMHO trying to come up with some kind of programmatic algorithm to judge
a bit of documentation as good enough to show is insane. I'm not
going to attempt it.
Fair enough.
Maybe
23 matches
Mail list logo
