I always found configuration overrides (e.g. ZCML's includeOverrides
directive) to be difficult to manage and hard to get right.
How about an alternative where you can put a priority on a
configuration context like so:
adapter zcml:priority=100 ... /
Default priority would be 0, traditional
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Malthe Borch mbo...@gmail.com wrote:
I always found configuration overrides (e.g. ZCML's includeOverrides
directive) to be difficult to manage and hard to get right.
How about an alternative where you can put a priority on a
configuration context like so:
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Dec 1 13:00:00 2010 UTC to Thu Dec 2 13:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 72 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 4 from buildbot at pov.lt, 19 from
buildbot at winbot.zope.org, 13 from ccomb at free.fr, 30 from jdriessen at
thehealthagency.com.
Test
On 2 December 2010 13:34, Benji York be...@benjiyork.com wrote:
I appreciate the flexibility inherent in that approach, but personally,
I'd be frightened of such a system. I sometimes have problems figuring
out which directives are active in the current system, if I had to
reason about dozens
On Thursday, December 02, 2010, Malthe Borch wrote:
As far as I understand, for a ZCML include override to work properly,
you need to carefully make sure that your includes are in the exact
right order and on the same level. In a system where two packages are
trying to override the same
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 07:26, Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net wrote:
Who would be interested in a sprint, when, where and how?
I'd be interested in remote sprinting. I'm available now, FWIW.
OK, so it's me and you then. :-)
Let's talk in January about doing something and staying online at
On 2 December 2010 14:37, Stephan Richter srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu wrote:
This explanation helped me to understand where you come from. I think I would
be okay with the priority feature, but could we maybe limit it to the
configure element? Since you can use this element anywhere and it
On 12/2/10 5:39 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 07:26, Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net wrote:
Who would be interested in a sprint, when, where and how?
I'd be interested in remote sprinting. I'm available now, FWIW.
OK, so it's me and you then. :-)
Let's talk in January
Am 02.12.2010, 14:19 Uhr, schrieb Malthe Borch mbo...@gmail.com:
As far as I understand, for a ZCML include override to work properly,
you need to carefully make sure that your includes are in the exact
right order and on the same level. In a system where two packages are
trying to override
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/02/2010 03:43 PM, Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 02.12.2010, 14:19 Uhr, schrieb Malthe Borch mbo...@gmail.com:
As far as I understand, for a ZCML include override to work properly,
you need to carefully make sure that your includes are in the
10 matches
Mail list logo
