experimental.broken is working well for me. It greatly aided me in
getting through a particularly nasty upgrade allowing me to cleanup the
ZCA cruft left by poorly behaved add-ons. I'd like to proceed with
adding the core of this to zope.interface and I need the
developers/maintainers to weigh in
Raphael Ritz writes:
> On 11/7/11 10:36 AM, Malthe Borch wrote:
>> On 7 November 2011 09:17, Ross Patterson wrote:
>>> The intention of this package is to see if the implementation of broken
>>> object handling is correct and robust enough to merge into
>>> zope.interface and zope.component them
Not ZCA/ZODB maintainer, but a big +1 from me.
I've also experienced the negative effects of missing code for
(marker) interfaces in persistent data.
Cheers,
Leo
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 22:04, Ross Patterson wrote:
> experimental.broken is working well for me. It greatly aided me in
> getting t
This is the summary for test reports received on the
zope-tests list between 2012-04-07 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-04-08 00:00:00 UTC:
See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.
An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our
buildbot documentation:
http://docs.zope.org/
