Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 1, OK: 37, UNKNOWN: 2

2012-05-02 Thread Michael Howitz
Am 02.05.2012 um 03:00 schrieb Zope tests summarizer: Non-OK results -- [1]UNKNOWN UNKNOWN : winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/061274.html [2]UNKNOWN UNKNOWN : winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 1, OK: 37, UNKNOWN: 2

2012-05-02 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 08:24:02AM +0200, Michael Howitz wrote: Am 02.05.2012 um 03:00 schrieb Zope tests summarizer: Non-OK results -- [1]UNKNOWN UNKNOWN : winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/061274.html [2]

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 1, OK: 37, UNKNOWN: 2

2012-05-02 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Adam GROSZER agroszer...@gmail.com wrote: or why that package gets included Adding zc.sourcefactory to the ZTK was a conscious choice. It was popular and often used in Zope 3-style projects, maybe even part of core Grok and BlueBream. We could remove it from ZTK

[Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 4, OK: 36, UNKNOWN: 2

2012-05-02 Thread Zope tests summarizer
This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-05-01 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-05-02 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: