Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 5, OK: 37, UNKNOWN: 1

2012-05-22 Thread Patrick Gerken
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Zope tests summarizer nore...@zope.org wrote: [1]    UNKNOWN FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063362.html Bug in test code, looks like a refactoring went bad. Error in test

[Zope-dev] ZTK 1.0 lifetime

2012-05-22 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Patrick Gerken do3cc...@googlemail.com wrote: Well, the question is, is there still a need for ztk 1.0 tests? If so, who are the consumers and for how long should we run the tests for 1.0? Zope 2.13 is based on the ZTK 1.0. There's no version of Zope 2 that

Re: [Zope-dev] ZTK 1.0 lifetime

2012-05-22 Thread Patrick Gerken
Eek, I started mixing up ztk and zope.app I didn't look too deep into Zope2 because my intention was more for asking whether packages like zope.app.appsetup need to be tested and they are only part of ztk 1.0 zopeapp.cfg, but now I had second look into versions.cfg of zope and plone and I am

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.interface 4.0.0 considered annoying.

2012-05-22 Thread Tres Seaver
On 05/20/2012 04:28 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote: On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: I will release a 4.0.1 silencing the warnings unless somebody speaks up in their favor. We should make sure we have 2to3 fixers for everything change as well. I added

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.interface 4.0.0 considered annoying.

2012-05-22 Thread Tres Seaver
On 05/21/2012 04:49 AM, Gediminas Paulauskas wrote: 2012/5/20 Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com: On 05/19/2012 07:23 PM, Jim Fulton wrote: On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: They already do: 4.0.0 makes them exceptions under Python3: that fact was

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 5, OK: 37, UNKNOWN: 1

2012-05-22 Thread Tres Seaver
On 05/22/2012 04:32 AM, Patrick Gerken wrote: [2]FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063350.html [3]FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063352.html [4]

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.interface 4.0.0 considered annoying.

2012-05-22 Thread Tres Seaver
On 05/19/2012 05:59 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: On 05/19/2012 12:12 PM, Jim Fulton wrote: I propose that these deprecation warnings be removed. I can do that, if that is the consensus. Now done, and released as zope.interface 4.0.1. Tres. --

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 5, OK: 37, UNKNOWN: 1

2012-05-22 Thread Patrick Gerken
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: On 05/22/2012 04:32 AM, Patrick Gerken wrote: [2]    FAILED  ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063350.html [3]    FAILED  ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit

[Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 2, OK: 41, UNKNOWN: 1

2012-05-22 Thread Zope tests summarizer
This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-05-21 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-05-22 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: