[Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-21 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Jun 20, 2007, at 1:48 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Btw, if I interpret http://svn.zope.org/?rev=76390view=rev correctly, it sounds like Tres has found a solution to that ZClass bug. We just need to propogate the patch to Zope 3.3/2.10 and trunk/ trunk. Right, Tres? What I fixed was

[Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-21 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Jun 21, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Andreas Zeidler wrote: and btw, andreas' branch[1] produces no test failures for me (at r76878) anyway, so imho we're good to go! :) and just fyi, the 2.10 branch[1] using zodb 3.8 also has no failures... (i still need to merge in recent changes from

[Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-21 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Jun 21, 2007, at 9:07 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: ah, here it is: http://svn.zope.org/?rev=76408view=rev should fix the zclasses problem, if i'm not totally mistaken. That change needs backporting, I think, to the ZODB 3.6 line (for 2.9) and 3.7 line (for 2.10). true, but i think philipp was

[Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-25 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: true, but i think philipp was only asking about 2.11 for the time being. i agree the fix should be backported, though. i'd even volunteer to do it, if nobody else wants to... :) That would be great, especially since we're on

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-25 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Jun 25, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Andreas Jung wrote: On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: That would be great, especially since we're on the verge of new maintenance releases for 2.9 and 2.10. when are they due? unfortunately i won't be able to do the backporting

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-25 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Jun 25, 2007, at 6:24 PM, Andreas Jung wrote: Back to the original subject...any objections to merge this 2.11 integration branch back on the trunk *with* failing ZClasses tests. hmm, maybe you lost me somewhere, but aren't we talking about your

[Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-25 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:48 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: Andreas Jung wrote: --On 25. Juni 2007 12:56:08 -0400 Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Shouldn't the Zope2 trunk be using ZODB 3.8 at this point? And won't we therefore get Jim's fix? The 2.11 integration branch also uses ZODB 3.8. So

[Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-28 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: On 21 Jun 2007, at 23:47 , Andreas Zeidler wrote: On Jun 21, 2007, at 9:07 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: ah, here it is: http://svn.zope.org/?rev=76408view=rev should fix the zclasses problem, if i'm not totally mistaken. That change

[Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-07-02 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Jun 29, 2007, at 11:16 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: If I know Andreas he won't do ZODB releases... So, apart from updating version.txt, CHANGES.txt, etc. and making a tag, I don't think there would be much else to a ZODB release... *wink* :) hmm, i'm not sure if i should do any

[Zope-dev] vulnerability in zope 2.10.4

2007-07-11 Thread Andreas Zeidler
hi, imho i've found a vulnerability in zope 2.10.4 or rather in the newer version of five (1.5.5) used by it. in `Five/browser/ pagetemplatefile.py` in line 27 `createTrustedZopeEngine` is used the instantiate the page template engine used by five templates, or at least this is what i

[Zope-dev] Re: vulnerability in zope 2.10.4

2007-07-11 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Jul 12, 2007, at 12:48 AM, Andreas Zeidler wrote: so, unless i'm completely wrong here, i'd say this is a pretty serious security whole, no? that should have been a hole, actually... too late already, sorry! :) andi -- zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED

[Zope-dev] Re: vulnerability in zope 2.10.4

2007-07-11 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Jul 12, 2007, at 2:50 AM, Tres Seaver wrote: so, unless i'm completely wrong here, i'd say this is a pretty serious security whole, no? No. It has been an accident that, until just recently, the filesystem-based templates in a Five view were running as untrusted code. yep, martin's

[Zope-dev] Re: Proposal: Merge philikon-aq branch into Zope trunk

2008-04-17 Thread Andreas Zeidler
Christian Theune wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:43:25PM +0200, Martijn Pieters wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Hanno Schlichting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to do the merge as soon as possible, so people can easily test it against all their applications and report back

[Zope-dev] Re: Zope2 monitoring

2008-05-13 Thread Andreas Zeidler
Hanno Schlichting wrote: Nice. We are already using supervisord for this project. Even more off-topic that's why we added the new 'console' command to the zopectl-like script in the zope2instance recipe, to have Zope running in fg mode without the forced automatic development mode. yay,

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.globalrequest?

2009-01-16 Thread Andreas Zeidler
Stephan Richter wrote: Then let's just mention its intended use in Zope 2/Plone in the documentation and go on with life. i've just added such a note and made a fresh release — http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zope.globalrequest/1.0a2 best regards, andi -- zeidler it consulting -

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.globalrequest?

2009-01-18 Thread Andreas Zeidler
Roger Ineichen wrote: I don't say that this is bad in general. I just say that if you build an application based on zope.globalrequest, this is a totaly different base concept how you will develop applications like we do now. And you have to pay the price with a complex test setup. it's

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.globalrequest?

2009-01-27 Thread Andreas Zeidler
Roger Ineichen wrote: I see your point. I'm not saying that this is bad in general. Probably when used in moderation is the right concept for this package ;-) and it wasn't written with anything else in mind -- merely for the odd case when you need a request object, but none has been passed

Re: [Zope-dev] iterating over class without __iter__ but with __getitem__ raises AttributeError:__iter__

2009-04-14 Thread Andreas Zeidler
hi chris, Chris Withers wrote: Andreas Jung wrote: Yes, so this change introduced a bug. Who's the right person to fix it? What's the right collector to report this in? Since Acquisition is a core module of Zope: the Zope 2 tracker on Launchpad. Done:

Re: [Zope-dev] iterating over class without __iter__ but with __getitem__ raises AttributeError:__iter__

2009-04-15 Thread Andreas Zeidler
Chris Withers wrote: Andreas Jung wrote: Yes, so this change introduced a bug. Who's the right person to fix it? What's the right collector to report this in? Since Acquisition is a core module of Zope: the Zope 2 tracker on Launchpad. Done: https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/360761

Re: [Zope-dev] [Zope 2.12.0a2]Acquisition+ExtensionClass failures with Python 2.6.2/Linux

2009-04-20 Thread Andreas Zeidler
Andreas Jung wrote: In addition, some of the Acquistion test fail when trying to test the package alone: [...] Can anyone reproduce this? no, i don't see any failures with neither 2.11.1 nor 2.12.1 on a debian box (32-bit, though). andi -- zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ -

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.testing 3.8 fails in mysterious ways

2009-08-03 Thread Andreas Zeidler
hi, just fyi: the bug is also present in zope.testing 3.7.7 (showing up when testing plone.z3cform). would it perhaps be possible to release a fixed 3.7.8 soon, so that our buildout stops complaining again? :) cheers, andi Godefroid Chapelle wrote: Sidnei da Silva wrote: On Thu, Jul 30,

Re: [Zope-dev] exception views lost context on Zope 2.12

2010-02-24 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On 23.02.10 13:36, Wichert Akkerman wrote: On 2/23/10 13:22 , Martin Aspeli wrote: Wichert Akkerman wrote: It is not useful, it is critical. Without the context you can not use any browser views for example. Well, the use cases that have been to date have done without it. :) I'm not

Re: [Zope-dev] Possible DateTime timezone-related regression in Zope 2.12

2010-03-05 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On 11.01.10 01:47, Martin Aspeli wrote: Laurence Rowe wrote: I believe the current behaviour is intentional to preserve backwards compatibility. See the discussion starting here: https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2007-October/030042.html Maybe it was 'fixed' on 2.10 branch some time

Re: [Zope-dev] Possible DateTime timezone-related regression in Zope 2.12

2010-03-05 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On 05.03.10 10:53, Andreas Zeidler wrote: also, look at the following (using `DateTime` 2.12): $ ~/plone/coredev/branches/4.0/bin/zopepy from DateTime import DateTime now = DateTime() now == DateTime(now) True now == DateTime(now.ISO()) False this is a _pretty_

Re: [Zope-dev] Possible DateTime timezone-related regression in Zope 2.12

2010-03-05 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On 05.03.10 11:10, Andreas Zeidler wrote: now == DateTime(now.ISO8601()) False now.ISO8601() '2010-03-05T11:06:09+01:00' unlike stated in `DateTime.interfaces` the string returned `ISO8601` method does not contain the time zone. oops, it does, of course (i think i'm still a bit

Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: Zope/branches/2.13/ fix `LazyMap` to avoid unnecessary function calls when not accessing items in order (fixes http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9018)

2010-12-15 Thread Andreas Zeidler
hi tres, On 14.12.2010, at 18:11, Tres Seaver wrote: On 12/14/2010 09:12 AM, Andreas Zeidler wrote: Modified: Zope/branches/2.13/src/Products/ZCatalog/Lazy.py === --- Zope/branches/2.13/src/Products/ZCatalog/Lazy.py 2010-12-14 13