Thu, 02 Jun 2005 19:38:02 -0400 Tim Peters wrote:
We'd like to continue getting non-ZODB code out of the ZODB project, so
would like to drop Mount.py from ZODB 3.5. Are any of zodb-dev's
standalone ZODB users making use of Mount.py? I would be surprised by
that too, since Mount.py relies on
on...
--
Balazs Ree jabber + email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 75955071 AIM + skype: reebalazs
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http
. But the same does
not happen with ipdb, of course.
So, my conclusion is that while doctests work well with the standard pdb,
any alternate debugger must be supported explicitely (by changing the
doctest code). As with ipdb, this may be the case with zpdb as well.
Best wishes
--
Balazs Ree
, then here tracebacks
are on topic.
Solution: use a pastebin.
I disagree: pastebin is good for linking from irc, but when I come back
to the archive I would like to see the details even when the pastebin
entry is gone.
--
Balazs Ree
___
Zope-Dev
import, but I believe that in
the vast majority of svn repositories that you would consider importing,
this information would not be there anyway, due to the fact that they are
product of the older svn version.
--
Balazs Ree
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope
and do
installation to be able to bootstrap their buildout, which is not exactly
a reason for them to choose Debian / Ubuntu in this case.
--
Balazs Ree
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
