Re: [Zope-dev] SiteAccess improvements

2001-11-24 Thread Gary Poster
Hey. Thanks for your return thoughts. - Original Message - From: emf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gary Poster wrote: * I need the ability to store arbitrary properties for each virtual host. In particular, the correlary of my current work is to provide a CMFVirtualHost tool that stores a sub

Re: [Zope-dev] [IDEA] ZopeRoot and SiteRoot

2001-12-18 Thread Gary Poster
Hi all. The Virtual Host Folder I released currently has a lot of the features you want, and is getting a number of other ones. I think it is worth a look, but then, that's just me. It replaces the VHM. I need to specify the interface, such as it is, but ... 1) The currently released one is

[Zope-dev] acquisition, traversal, __roles__(, and zpt?)

2002-02-05 Thread Gary Poster
Hi everyone. OK. I'm stumped. I'm doing funky tricks here to create an alias functionality somewhat similar to a transparent folder. In the belief that brevity begets more possibility for answers, I won't tell you more, but just get straight to the chase: Zope 2.5, CMF 1.2 (but I'm using the

Re: [Zope-dev] acquisition, traversal, __roles__(, and zpt?)

2002-02-06 Thread Gary Poster
Hey Chris. Thanks for the response. From: Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maybe silly questions, but: Do you call InitializeGlobals() on ObjectX's class (usually at the end of the module where it's defined)? Hmm. No...do you mean Globals.InitializeClass? I do that. Does ObjectX

RE: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-03-02 Thread Gary Poster
If there is any interest in spiffing the Virtual Host Folder up for inclusion in Zope 2.6, I'll do the work. It requires Ordered Folder 0.5.1, and needs just a bit more spiffing. Gary -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lennart Regebro

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-03-03 Thread Gary Poster
From: Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gary Poster wrote: If there is any interest in spiffing the Virtual Host Folder up for inclusion in Zope 2.6, I'll do the work. It requires Ordered Folder 0.5.1, and needs just a bit more spiffing. Why does it require ordered folder? What does

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 project updated

2002-03-05 Thread Gary Poster
If the VirtualHostFolder is included, that will mean OrderedFolder is also incorporated in 2.6. I think OrderedFolder should be added as its own item to the proposed features list for individual consideration. Then the question of Resources arises. That is Stephan's product, not mine, and it

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 project updated

2002-03-06 Thread Gary Poster
From: Joachim Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi! What kind of problems does OrderedFolder have? There is no OS-specific code AFAIK. It is possible that there are browser-specific issues in the frontend. But those would be easy to fix ... Hi :-) In certain circumstances, if you install

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 project updated

2002-03-06 Thread Gary Poster
From: Stephan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] If OF will make it in the core, the ZBabel stuff will be taken out of it in anyway, since no part of Zope has something like that in it. I am also tempted to say that only the ordering module should go in (maybe the limit as well), since other

Re: [Zope-dev] Putting a list of objects into the current namespace (or something)

2002-03-12 Thread Gary Poster
From: Max M [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am just pretty unshure about this approach though, so I am fishing for anything like it. The closest thing I have found was in the Transparent Folder product. The Alias element of my Virtual Host Folder does something similar as well. I can tell you that this

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 project updated

2002-03-12 Thread Gary Poster
Hi. 1) If the projects for which I have volunteered are accepted as a goal for Zope 2.6 then I have some work cut out for me, and I'd like to try to schedule the necessary time intelligently and early. Any ideas on when the grocery list will be evaluated? 2) If we had a brief Zope 2.6 style

Re: [Zope-dev] Restricting Sub-Objects in Folders DYNAMICALLY?

2002-03-16 Thread Gary Poster
Does OrderedFolder do what you want? See http://demo.iuveno-net.de/iuveno/Products/OrderedFolder (item 3 in the list of features). It may or may not be a standard folder feature in 2.6 as well. Gary ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Python 2.2 (was Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!)

2002-03-18 Thread Gary Poster
In my own casual experimentation, Zope worked okay by itself on Mandrake Linux 8.2b4 with Python 2.2, but ZEO refused to work. For what it's worth. Gary - Original Message - From: Matt Behrens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lennart Regebro wrote: Are you planning to up the python version to

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] Are there Graphic Designers?

2002-04-05 Thread Gary Poster
I almost 100% agree with Casey--and hallelujah for him writing it, because that means I don't have to. ;-) I agree that we ought to trash frames we ought to use strict xhtml 1.0 we ought to rely on CSS for all graphic elements (correlative) we ought to not use *any* shims or non-logical

Re: [Zope-dev] Speaking of 2.6...

2002-04-16 Thread Gary Poster
On Tuesday 16 April 2002 03:44 pm, Brian Lloyd wrote: ...I sent out a note a while ago now trying to scare up some ideas on how to vet the current list of 2.6 proposals and get to a final plan. I didn't get much (any?) response :( By the way, Brian, if I can with the remaining amount of

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope components and revision control with cvs

2002-08-01 Thread Gary Poster
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 15:04, Shane Hathaway wrote: There are a few products on zope.org for integrating with CVS. Look through the downloadable products. I think there are CVSFolder and ZCVSFile (or something like that), maybe more. However, most version control tools are difficult to

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: The remaining spanner in the works :-)

2002-08-02 Thread Gary Poster
I agree with Chris: *wow*! [re the original explanation] ... I'm sure I left a few things out, so ask questions about the unclear parts. Everything was wonderfully clear, except that the actual mechanism to convert the nested tuples flexibly to RDBMS record sequences escaped me a bit. This

[Zope-dev] Zope + Jabber?

2003-03-31 Thread Gary Poster
Is anyone working on Jabber integration with Zope? I can think of some nice use cases for this. Gary ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists -

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope + Jabber?

2003-03-31 Thread Gary Poster
like Jabber that can be used over both desktop and standard mobile devices seems very practical, exciting, and powerful. Gary Phil Harris wrote: Gary, It's been on my mind from time to time. What sort of things can you see in your minds eye? Phil On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 10:08:41 -0500, Gary

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope + Jabber?

2003-03-31 Thread Gary Poster
I would be very interested in taking a look. :-) Too bad the jabber library you used is unmaintained. Thanks Gary cguardia wrote: I have used Zope+Jabber in the past, with an old version of a jabber library that seems to be unmaintained as of now. I copied the library code into a python

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope + Jabber?

2003-04-01 Thread Gary Poster
Interesting. Thanks. Interesting also that they are no longer (or not yet?) listing it on their products page. Gary Alastair Burt wrote: Gary Poster [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-03-31): Is anyone working on Jabber integration with Zope? I can think of some nice use cases for this. An Italian

[Zope-dev] Zope 3 newsletter 8th edition

2003-06-12 Thread Gary Poster
more about the certification please see http://www.commoncriteria.org Stay zoped! GARY POSTER (ZOPE CORPORATION): Zope 3 plus Zope 2 I have been working on integrating Zope 3 with Zope 2 on a Zope Corporation customer project. The project leverages ZCML to only load the parts of Zope 3

[Zope-dev] Ninth Zope 3 Newsletter

2003-07-25 Thread Gary Poster
WELCOME TO THE ZOPE 3 NEWSLETTER: ISSUE 9 (25 JULY 2003) Welcome to the ninth Zope 3 newsletter. Information about Zope 3 and newsletter contributions and suggestions can be found at the bottom of this newsletter. GLOSSARY FOR THE UNINITIATED Encounter a term in this newsletter you

[Zope-dev] Zope 3 Newsletter: Issue 10

2003-09-05 Thread Gary Poster
WELCOME TO THE ZOPE 3 NEWSLETTER: ISSUE 10 (5 SEPTEMBER 2003) Welcome to the tenth Zope 3 newsletter. Information about Zope 3 and newsletter contributions and suggestions can be found at the bottom of this newsletter. GLOSSARY FOR THE UNINITIATED Encounter a term in this newsletter you

[Zope-dev] Zope 3 Newsletter 11

2003-12-23 Thread Gary Poster
WELCOME TO THE ZOPE 3 NEWSLETTER: ISSUE 11 (23 DECEMBER 2003) Welcome to the eleventh Zope 3 newsletter. Information about Zope 3 and newsletter contributions and suggestions can be found at the bottom of this newsletter. GLOSSARY FOR THE UNINITIATED Encounter a term in this newsletter

[Zope-dev] Re: Broken Unittest

2004-03-02 Thread Gary Poster
Hi Christian. What are the (possibly) pertinent elements to the changes in your sandbox? Gary Christian Theune wrote: Hi, I address you directly because I haven't received feedback on this from the zope-dev mailinglist and you have been the last ones touching code in Products/DateIndex. This

[Zope-dev] Re: Broken Unittest

2004-03-02 Thread Gary Poster
That sounds possible. I added support of Python 2.3 datetime, and while I tried to handle alternate timezones correctly I may have failed. I'll try to look at this later today. Gary Tres Seaver wrote: Christian Theune wrote: Hi, I address you directly because I haven't received feedback on

[Zope-dev] Re: Broken Unittest

2004-03-02 Thread Gary Poster
Christian: I think I saw and fixed the problem, if your machine's local time is GMT. Could you please cvs up the test and see if the issue is resolved? Thanks Gary Tres Seaver wrote: Christian Theune wrote: Hi, I address you directly because I haven't received feedback on this from the

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Broken Unittest

2004-03-03 Thread Gary Poster
Christian Theune wrote: ... the problem ... seems fixed by the changed test. Yay! So I'll mark this as resolved in my mental collector. Thanks for bringing this to my attention, and sorry it caused you grief. Gary ___ Zope-Dev maillist -

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Proposal: Rename zope package

2004-04-20 Thread Gary Poster
+1 Jim Fulton wrote: What do people think about alternative 4? ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists -

[Zope-dev] Re: RFC: TALES adapters and TAL/Tales variable namespaces

2004-05-28 Thread Gary Poster
Jim Fulton wrote: Given that, I still prefer context#dc to context/##dc. +1, also in preference to /# and the other options I've seen. Gary ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or

[Zope-dev] zope.org SVN Sandbox area created for contributors

2004-11-18 Thread Gary Poster
SUMMARY: The Zope.org Subversion repository now has a sandbox area for collaboration by contributors. This area has no constraints for checkins except those listed in the contributors agreement, and is intended to promote experimentation and easy, quick sharing. Details and how-to are below.

Re: [Zope-dev] mechanism for license boilerplate?

2005-05-31 Thread Gary Poster
On May 30, 2005, at 3:06 PM, Andreas Jung wrote: --On 30. Mai 2005 12:35:22 -0400 Chad Whitacre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, I am wondering what mechanism the Zope team uses to manage the copyright/license boilerplate at the top of every file. Is this handled manually or is

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Gary Poster
On Nov 23, 2005, at 10:16 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Sounds crazy, I know. But I'm serious. Looking for your comments at: http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/ ReuniteZope2AndZope3InTheSourceCodeRepository I already spoke with Philipp on IRC about this, but for the record, and speaking

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Gary Poster
While I don't agree with the +1 voters, I understand and appreciate their arguments. That said... On Nov 23, 2005, at 6:49 PM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote: People keep telling Zope2 developers that the inclusion of Zope3 doesn't mean you have to touch it, if you don't use it it is just inert

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-12-01 Thread Gary Poster
On Nov 30, 2005, at 2:18 PM, Chris Withers wrote: Gary Poster wrote: Zope 2 depends on Zope 3, via Five. Zope 3 does not depend on Zope 2. A very good point, but one which makes me feel that Zope 2 shouldn't be merged in with Zope 3 ;-) Actually, yes, all of my points were made

Re: [Zope-dev] buildbot failure in Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot

2005-12-02 Thread Gary Poster
On Dec 2, 2005, at 9:49 AM, Chris Withers wrote: What test failed here? Go to ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot. This url: Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Click on the 'log' link for the failed test.

[Zope-dev] Nine new ZC Zope 3 packages on zope.org

2006-02-03 Thread Gary Poster
Zope Corp has released nine new packages as standalone Zope 3 projects on zope.org. Three are completely new to the zope.org repository, and six were previously part of the zc Sandbox on zope.org. These three packages are brand new to zope.org. zc.shortcut Our (second) take on the

[Zope-dev] Re: zasync : svn repo and Zope-2.9 branch

2006-02-09 Thread Gary Poster
On Feb 9, 2006, at 9:38 AM, Julien Anguenot wrote: Hi there, I worked on a Zope-2.9 branch of off the CVS HEAD for zasync this week. It over there: http://svn.nuxeo.org/trac/pub/browser/vendor/zasync/branches/z29-nux/ awesome! The customer is currently testing out an application using

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: merge zope-dev and zope3-dev?

2006-02-17 Thread Gary Poster
On Feb 17, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Chris Withers wrote: Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: We'd have to declare the zope3-dev list for obsolete and make people not send messages to it. We'd just have to define a date and time. All subsequent mail traffic would be handled by zope-dev. Okay, who

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] Two visions

2006-02-27 Thread Gary Poster
On Feb 27, 2006, at 10:37 AM, Jim Fulton wrote: 2) In an alternate vision, Zope 2 evolves to Zope 5. Of the two, this seems more believable. It also may be the best we can do. However, I still don't like it. :-) - Zope 5 will be the application server generally known as Zope. It

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] Two visions

2006-02-28 Thread Gary Poster
On Feb 28, 2006, at 9:30 AM, Benji York wrote: Martijn Faassen wrote: So, my proposal would be to tone down the vision to what we have already: a co-evolving Zope 3 and Zope 2, with Zope 2 following and Zope 3 leading (or Zope 2 driving Zope 3 forward, however you want to see it). No

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope-dev] Two visions

2006-02-28 Thread Gary Poster
On Feb 28, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: Are you kidding? No, I'm not kidding. +1 to what Martijn said in this email (not quoting the whole thing to save precious bandwith). ___ Zope-Dev maillist -

Re: [Zope-dev] Issue with 'with' keyword in zope.interface

2006-09-10 Thread Gary Poster
On Sep 8, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Grig Gheorghiu wrote: Just thought I'd bring this to your attention: http://agiletesting.blogspot.com/2006/09/pay-attention-to-new-with- keyword.html This is fixed in the 3.3 branch and the trunk. However, I don't know of a distribution with the changes.

Re: [Zope-dev] difference between OOSet and OOTreeSet?

2007-03-01 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 1, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Chris Withers wrote: Hi All, Wondering if someone could tell me the difference between an OOSet and an OOTreeSet? They seem to have different interfaces and yet seem to be used in similar circumstances in PluginIndexes/common/UnIndex.py... I'm looking for a

Re: [Zope-dev] difference between OOSet and OOTreeSet?

2007-03-01 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 1, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Chris Withers wrote: Hi Gary, Gary Poster wrote: What should I be using? TreeSet. Interesting, okay, so how should I work around this bogosity? Is this a bug? from BTrees.OOBTree import OOTreeSet,OOSet for i in OOSet((1,2,3)): print i, 1 2 3 for i

Re: [Zope-dev] difference between OOSet and OOTreeSet?

2007-03-01 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 1, 2007, at 3:18 PM, Chris Withers wrote: Gary Poster wrote: Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in ? TypeError: argument to reversed() must be a sequence The fact that this works for the OOSet is an implementation accident. As discussed elsewhere in this thread

Re: [Zope-dev] difference between OOSet and OOTreeSet?

2007-03-02 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 2, 2007, at 2:42 AM, Chris Withers wrote: Gary Poster wrote: Okay, so I want a persistent, ordered sequence which is quick to find items in and which doesn't re-store the whole sequence when an item is inserted or removed. What should I be using? Ordered, as in sorted

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: proxies

2008-01-16 Thread Gary Poster
On Jan 16, 2008, at 3:19 AM, Chris Withers wrote: Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: - can these proxies be used to keep track of a traversal path in much the same way (although no seperate containment and context chains needed) as the old Zope 2 acquisition wrappers did? We generally assign

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.sendmail Retry fixes and new state machine.

2008-03-09 Thread Gary Poster
These changes sound great. I just looked for your checkins in the checkins list. I didn't find them. If I recall correctly, this usually happens if the committer is not subscribed to the list and has not been blessed by an admin to let the messages through anyway. So, if I'm right, it

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.sendmail Retry fixes and new state machine.

2008-03-09 Thread Gary Poster
I did a five-minute skim of the checkin but hope to look a bit more tomorrow. Hopefully Marius, Benji, Albertas, or someone else who has actually done work on this package will take a look and chime in. I did have one somewhat trivial thought. I generally prefer durations and intervals

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: zope.sendmail Retry fixes and new state machine.

2008-03-10 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 10, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: Gary Poster wrote: [...] Doctest/unittest holy war: bah. I've heard the arguments, I don't see either side as perfect, and I've made my choice. I'm very fine with others having different opinions and choices. As Benji said

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.sendmail Retry fixes and new state machine.

2008-03-11 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 11, 2008, at 5:01 PM, Matthew Grant wrote: Hi! On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 20:54 -0400, Gary Poster wrote: I did have one somewhat trivial thought. I generally prefer durations and intervals expressed as datetime.timedeltas myself, because they convey their meaning without having

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: GSoC proposal

2008-04-03 Thread Gary Poster
On Apr 3, 2008, at 7:09 PM, Malthe Borch wrote: On 04/04/2008, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: zope.security uses RestrictedPython, iirc... For untrusted python, yes –– but is anyone using this (in Zope 3)? Yup. Gary ___ Zope-Dev

Re: [Zope-dev] buildbot news: sending notifications and current broken builds

2008-06-06 Thread Gary Poster
Hey Christian. Thanks for this. It would be nice to have a link from this page to the failure output (to address works for me issues, as well as for a quick triage). Gary ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org

Re: [Zope-dev] buildbot news: sending notifications and current broken builds

2008-06-06 Thread Gary Poster
On Jun 6, 2008, at 7:44 AM, Gary Poster wrote: Hey Christian. Thanks for this. It would be nice to have a link from this page to the failure output (to address works for me issues, as well as for a quick triage). ...but I found 'em by digging around on the site, so, mostly nevermind

Re: [Zope-dev] buildbot news: sending notifications and current broken builds

2008-06-06 Thread Gary Poster
On Jun 6, 2008, at 8:37 AM, Benji York wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've watched my buildbot send out notifications for a while and pondered how to make them available to more people. We really need something like this. Thanks. A

Re: [Zope-dev] buildbot news: sending notifications and current broken builds

2008-06-06 Thread Gary Poster
On Jun 6, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Fred Drake wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Benji York [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I avoided suggesting this earlier, but perhaps we need to define a level to run the tests at. Then buildbot could run all tests at level X and below and you could put the

Re: [Zope-dev] zc.authorizedotnet

2008-08-04 Thread Gary Poster
Hi Juan. Certainly we'd hate to see an unnecessary fork. Are you a Zope Contributor? I don't keep up with all the preferred mechanisms for external contributors, so we'll ask around if not. You'll have to make some license assignments (to Zope Foundation and contributors, I believe) and

[Zope-dev] zope.app.authentication 3.4.3 + download.zope.org/simple == broken

2008-08-14 Thread Gary Poster
If you use the http://download.zope.org/ppix or http://download.zope.org/simple indexes and try to get zope.app.authentication 3.4.3 (the newest), you will get a 404 error. Looking at PyPI and the zope.org index, it is evident why. http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zope.app.authentication/3.4.3

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.app.authentication 3.4.3 + download.zope.org/simple == broken

2008-08-14 Thread Gary Poster
On Aug 14, 2008, at 4:32 PM, Christophe Combelles wrote: Gary Poster a écrit : If you use the http://download.zope.org/ppix or http://download.zope.org/simple indexes and try to get zope.app.authentication 3.4.3 (the newest), you will get a 404 error. Looking at PyPI and the zope.org

Re: [Zope-dev] zc.dict.OrderedDict efficiency

2008-09-20 Thread Gary Poster
On Sep 18, 2008, at 4:02 PM, Benji York wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Thomas Lotze [EMAIL PROTECTED] lotze.de wrote: The documentation of OrderedDict from zc.dict 1.2.1 states that the current implementation is inefficient for large collections because it uses a PersistentList

Re: [Zope-dev] zc.dict.OrderedDict efficiency

2008-09-23 Thread Gary Poster
On Sep 23, 2008, at 2:54 AM, Thomas Lotze wrote: Gary Poster wrote: [zc.blist] To release it responsibly now, someone needs to claim maintainership. As I was the one asking in the first place, I'm willing to do this Great! Thank you! unless there's a policy for zc.* packages

[Zope-dev] problem with svn commit on svn.zope.org: read-only file-system???

2008-11-09 Thread Gary Poster
$ svn commit -m '[message omitted]' Sendingsrc/zope/testbrowser/cookies.py Sendingsrc/zope/testbrowser/cookies.txt Transmitting file data ..svn: Commit failed (details follow): svn: Can't create directory '/svn/repos/main/db/transactions/ 92837-1.txn': Read-only file system $ svn

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zope.testbrowser/trunk/ - Switched to Zope 3.4 KGS.

2008-12-08 Thread Gary Poster
On Dec 8, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Benji York wrote: On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Christian Zagrodnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Log message for revision 93722: - Switched to Zope 3.4 KGS. - New lines are no longer stripped in XML and HTML code contained in a textarea; requires

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zope.testbrowser/trunk/ - Switched to Zope 3.4 KGS.

2008-12-08 Thread Gary Poster
On Dec 8, 2008, at 12:23 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Benji York wrote: On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Gary Poster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 8, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Benji York wrote: On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Christian Zagrodnick

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.dict/branches/tlotze-blist/src/zc/dict/ordered.txt added a test to ensure the order is stored in a BList

2008-12-23 Thread Gary Poster
Hi Thomas. Very cool that you are working on zc.dict + zc.blist. The updateOrder API is a sucky API for blists, as I'm sure you've realized. :-) FWIW, I seem to recall that Plone has a reasonable-to-nice API for changing order in containers, and the API would be able to take much better

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.dict/branches/tlotze-blist/src/zc/dict/ordered.txt added a test to ensure the order is stored in a BList

2008-12-23 Thread Gary Poster
On Dec 23, 2008, at 2:11 PM, Thomas Lotze wrote: Thomas Lotze t...@gocept.com schrieb: Yes, and I think that we're talking about two steps here anyway. I'd like to finish and release a version that uses BLists ASAP; Well, I think the switch to BLists is finished, so I'd be ready to merge

[Zope-dev] Some tools from the Launchpad project

2009-01-13 Thread Gary Poster
Hi all. As announced elsewhere (and described in https://dev.launchpad.net/OpenSourcing) , Canonical's Launchpad project is working towards open-sourcing the majority of the code base by this summer. Prior and subsequent to the grand open-sourcing date, the Launchpad developers are

Re: [Zope-dev] Some tools from the Launchpad project

2009-01-13 Thread Gary Poster
On Jan 13, 2009, at 4:15 PM, Dan Korostelev wrote: 2009/1/14 Dan Korostelev nad...@gmail.com: 2009/1/13 Gary Poster gary.pos...@gmail.com: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/lazr.delegates Provides an interesting Python delegation pattern. Uses zope.interface. I took a quick view

[Zope-dev] Request input on bug about HTTP response.setStatus

2009-01-28 Thread Gary Poster
Hi all. There's some disagreement about how to resolve the bug below, even though there's agreement that we want it resolved. Your input would be appreciated so we can find a consensus and move forward with a solution. https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/zope3/+bug/322486 Gary

Re: [Zope-dev] Merge zc.copy with zope.copypastemove and zope.location.

2009-02-08 Thread Gary Poster
As the author, +1 and thank you! Gary On Feb 8, 2009, at 11:18 AM, Dan Korostelev wrote: Okay. I prepared the zope.copy package in the SVN for you to check out what I mean. :) 2009/2/8 Dan Korostelev nad...@gmail.com: After looking at the whole copy thing for some more time, I thought

Re: [Zope-dev] Merge zc.copy with zope.copypastemove and zope.location.

2009-02-08 Thread Gary Poster
On Feb 8, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Dan Korostelev wrote: 2009/2/9 Gary Poster gary.pos...@gmail.com: As the author, +1 and thank you! Glad to hear. I'll release the result of the merge soon. BTW, I'd also like to make a final release of zc.copy, replacing its code with dependencies/imports from

Re: [Zope-dev] opensp...@pycon 2009 about Zope/Repoze/Grok/Deliverence etc.

2009-02-09 Thread Gary Poster
On Feb 9, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote: Lots of things have happened in the Zope universe the last couple of years, and are still happening, some of which are turning Zope inside out, from a monolithic ghetto to a componentized agile speed monster. People outside the Zope world

[Zope-dev] zope.testing tests failing on trunk (using Python 2.4.6 and 2.5.4)

2009-02-16 Thread Gary Poster
zope.testing trunk has five tests failing in Python 2.4.6 and four failing in Python 2.5.4 (on self-compiled versions on Mac OS X). Anyone know what the story is here? Gary ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.testing tests failing on trunk (using Python 2.4.6 and 2.5.4)

2009-02-16 Thread Gary Poster
On Feb 16, 2009, at 3:11 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote: On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:17:06AM -0500, Gary Poster wrote: zope.testing trunk has five tests failing in Python 2.4.6 and four failing in Python 2.5.4 (on self-compiled versions on Mac OS X). Anyone know what the story is here? No clue

Re: [Zope-dev] Single Sign On

2009-02-17 Thread Gary Poster
Hi Shane. Launchpad uses OpenID. We don't have that slated for abstraction and open-sourcing immediately. However, most of the Launchpad code (including this bit) is to be open-sourced by this summer, abstracted or not. Therefore, we should at least be able to give you some idea of what

Re: [Zope-dev] Single Sign On

2009-02-18 Thread Gary Poster
On Feb 17, 2009, at 7:55 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote: Gary Poster wrote: Launchpad uses OpenID. We don't have that slated for abstraction and open-sourcing immediately. However, most of the Launchpad code (including this bit) is to be open-sourced by this summer, abstracted

Re: [Zope-dev] Single Sign On

2009-02-19 Thread Gary Poster
On Feb 19, 2009, at 2:07 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote: I have the impression that you're talking past each other. There are two ways of using OpenID: * you can be an OpenID provider, i.e. accept logins with username password and respond to authentication requests from other websites

[Zope-dev] Review of zc.dict tlotze-blist branch

2009-02-24 Thread Gary Poster
[Thomas asked me to review his zc.dict branch a while ago.] Hi Thomas. Thank you for this work. It looks great. I do have several comments below (from an abbreviated diff against the current trunk). Index: buildout.cfg

Re: [Zope-dev] the Zope Framework project

2009-03-02 Thread Gary Poster
Thank you for the huge effort you expended on this, Martijn. You are right, with Jim taking a rest from his much-appreciated past years as leader, no one is in a position to guide the Zope name. We do have community leaders, such as yourself, but they are guiding other names at the moment.

Re: [Zope-dev] the Zope Framework project

2009-03-03 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 3, 2009, at 7:35 AM, Martijn Pieters wrote: ... And so far I haven't heard any better ideas than what Martijn is proposing (no, leaving the status quo, deny there is a problem and steer by majority is not a counter proposal in my view). It may be that the idea needs some tweaking,

Re: [Zope-dev] the Zope Framework project

2009-03-03 Thread Gary Poster
in my proposed panarchy), if from a slightly different perspective. Gary Poster wrote: Moreover, if you are willing to step up and declare that you are starting something called the Zope Framework that manages a known good set of code, and you hope other projects and people join

Re: [Zope-dev] the Zope Framework project

2009-03-03 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 3, 2009, at 10:57 AM, Stephan Richter wrote: On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Gary Poster wrote: My mild counter proposal was this. - The ZF formally institutes an easy way for people to start Zope projects - Hopefully, Martijn F. starts something like the project he described

Re: [Zope-dev] Review of zc.dict tlotze-blist branch

2009-03-04 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 4, 2009, at 2:20 AM, Thomas Lotze wrote: Gary Poster gary.pos...@gmail.com schrieb: Index: src/zc/dict/configure.zcml === --- src/zc/dict/configure.zcml (.../trunk) (revision 0) +++ src/zc/dict/configure.zcml

Re: [Zope-dev] Standard request/response API

2009-03-05 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 1, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Jim Fulton wrote: There's been some discussion recently about separating the interfaces in zope.publisher from the implementations to facilitate other implementations. I think it would be great to standardize request and response APIs. I'd love to see this

[Zope-dev] Zope 3 app server dying? (was Re: the Zope Framework project)

2009-03-05 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 5, 2009, at 6:38 AM, Hermann Himmelbauer wrote: And I am personally interested if the Zope 3 app server is something that's dying in favour for other projects (Plone/Grok) or is actively used. Not clear on what you mean by the app server. If you mean zope.publisher, no, I don't

Re: [Zope-dev] setup.py extra dependencies

2009-03-05 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 5, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote: Hi there, I know opinions are divergent about 'extra' dependencies in setup.py. These ar dependencies that effectively make a single project with a single dependency structure into a number of virtual packages that each can have a separate

Re: [Zope-dev] setup.py extra dependencies

2009-03-06 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 6, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote: Hi there, Thanks Gary for sketching our the zc.async usecase. Note that zc.async isn't in the Zope Framework at this point in time so it wouldn't be directly affected by this policy, but it's still a useful usecase of course. Right,

Re: [Zope-dev] setup.py extra dependencies

2009-03-06 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 6, 2009, at 4:30 PM, Dan Korostelev wrote: 2009/3/6 Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martijn Faassen wrote: Hey, Laurence Rowe wrote: [snip] It seems there is a 'tests_require' One reason that isn't used is that apparently there

Re: [Zope-dev] Python3 and attribute annotations.

2009-03-09 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 9, 2009, at 5:20 PM, Dan Korostelev wrote: Hi zope developers! As you may know, python 3 introduced the concept of annotations for callable objects. That annotations store information about arguments and return values, which is kinda nice language feature that will allow us to do

Re: [Zope-dev] zc.relationship - can't pickle module objects

2009-03-16 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 16, 2009, at 4:02 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote: Hi, I *think* this is a bug in zc.relationship, but I'm not quite sure. I'm using ZODB3 3.8.1 (to get BLOB support) and trying to install plone.app.relations, which depends on zc.relationship 1.0.2. In particular, it subclasses

Re: [Zope-dev] zc.relationship - can't pickle module objects

2009-03-16 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 16, 2009, at 8:39 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote: Gary Poster wrote: On Mar 16, 2009, at 4:02 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote: Hi, I *think* this is a bug in zc.relationship, but I'm not quite sure. I'm using ZODB3 3.8.1 (to get BLOB support) and trying to install plone.app.relations, which

Re: [Zope-dev] zc.relationship - can't pickle module objects

2009-03-16 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 16, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote: Hi Gary, zc.relationship 2.0 trunk is now essentially a wrapping of zc.relation code for backwards compatibility. I see. But 2.0dev on pypi isn't? What's the story behind zc.relation and the evolution of zc.relationship? Briefly, I

Re: [Zope-dev] zc.relationship - can't pickle module objects

2009-03-16 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote: Hi Gary, Thanks for being so helpful! Happy to. What's the difference between 1.1.1 and 2.0dev on pypi? I intended that 1.1.1 would simply make the absolutely minimal changes necessary for you to be able to use the 1.1 branch. It

Re: [Zope-dev] setting missing minimum version in setup.py

2009-03-16 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 16, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Dan Korostelev wrote: 2009/3/16 Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com: There is a compromise I am willing to take. If package zope.bar depends on a *new feature* or *feature change* in zope.foo 1.3.x, then it should specify the version. In other words

Re: [Zope-dev] zc.relationship - can't pickle module objects

2009-03-16 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 16, 2009, at 1:20 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote: Martin Aspeli wrote: Gary Poster wrote: Hopefully. Do we know that zc.relationship 1.1 works with both ZODB versions? That would be a significant point of its existence, so I certainly hope so. I'm 80%+ confident that it does, and would

Re: [Zope-dev] zc.relationship - can't pickle module objects

2009-03-17 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:55 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote: Gary Poster wrote: Yes, +1. Thank you. I was about to write to your other message that this was quite possibly the only 3.8 dependency. Cool. Committed. If we do that, then we can let plone.relations depend on zc.relationship 1.1.1

Re: [Zope-dev] Please use launchpad bugtracking/blueprints more

2009-03-25 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 25, 2009, at 11:52 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote: Hi Martijn, On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote: One question is what launchpad project we should use. The current launchpad is for Zope 3. The steering group isn't about Zope 3. It's about a

Re: [Zope-dev] PyCon?

2009-03-25 Thread Gary Poster
On Mar 24, 2009, at 6:12 AM, Chris Withers wrote: Hey All, Who's around at PyCon? If so, when/where are we meeting up? Arriving Thursday evening, leaving following Thursday afternoon. I'm starting at the Hyatt, going to the Crowne Plaza on Monday. Email is maybe the best public way to get

  1   2   >