Hey. Thanks for your return thoughts.
- Original Message -
From: emf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gary Poster wrote:
* I need the ability to store arbitrary properties for each virtual
host.
In particular, the correlary of my current work is to provide a
CMFVirtualHost tool that stores a sub
Hi all. The Virtual Host Folder I released currently has a lot of the
features you want, and is getting a number of other ones. I think it is
worth a look, but then, that's just me. It replaces the VHM. I need to
specify the interface, such as it is, but ...
1) The currently released one is
Hi everyone.
OK. I'm stumped. I'm doing funky tricks here to create an alias
functionality somewhat similar to a transparent folder. In the belief that
brevity begets more possibility for answers, I won't tell you more, but just
get straight to the chase:
Zope 2.5, CMF 1.2 (but I'm using the
Hey Chris. Thanks for the response.
From: Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maybe silly questions, but: Do you call InitializeGlobals() on ObjectX's
class (usually at the end of the module where it's defined)?
Hmm. No...do you mean Globals.InitializeClass? I do that.
Does ObjectX
If there is any interest in spiffing the Virtual Host Folder up for
inclusion in Zope 2.6, I'll do the work. It requires Ordered Folder 0.5.1,
and needs just a bit more spiffing.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of Lennart Regebro
From: Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gary Poster wrote:
If there is any interest in spiffing the Virtual Host Folder up for
inclusion in Zope 2.6, I'll do the work. It requires Ordered Folder
0.5.1,
and needs just a bit more spiffing.
Why does it require ordered folder? What does
If the VirtualHostFolder is included, that will mean OrderedFolder is also
incorporated in 2.6. I think OrderedFolder should be added as its own item
to the proposed features list for individual consideration.
Then the question of Resources arises.
That is Stephan's product, not mine, and it
From: Joachim Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
What kind of problems does OrderedFolder have? There is no OS-specific
code
AFAIK. It is possible that there are browser-specific issues in the
frontend. But those would be easy to fix ...
Hi :-)
In certain circumstances, if you install
From: Stephan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If OF will make it in the core, the ZBabel stuff will be taken out of it
in
anyway, since no part of Zope has something like that in it. I am also
tempted to say that only the ordering module should go in (maybe the limit
as well), since other
From: Max M [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am just pretty unshure about this approach though, so I am fishing for
anything like it. The closest thing I have found was in the Transparent
Folder product.
The Alias element of my Virtual Host Folder does something similar as well.
I can tell you that this
Hi.
1) If the projects for which I have volunteered are accepted as a goal for
Zope 2.6 then I have some work cut out for me, and I'd like to try to
schedule the necessary time intelligently and early. Any ideas on when the
grocery list will be evaluated?
2) If we had a brief Zope 2.6 style
Does OrderedFolder do what you want? See
http://demo.iuveno-net.de/iuveno/Products/OrderedFolder (item 3 in the list
of features). It may or may not be a standard folder feature in 2.6 as
well.
Gary
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In my own casual experimentation, Zope worked okay by itself on Mandrake
Linux 8.2b4 with Python 2.2, but ZEO refused to work.
For what it's worth.
Gary
- Original Message -
From: Matt Behrens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lennart Regebro wrote:
Are you planning to up the python version to
I almost 100% agree with Casey--and hallelujah for him writing it, because
that means I don't have to. ;-)
I agree that
we ought to trash frames
we ought to use strict xhtml 1.0
we ought to rely on CSS for all graphic elements
(correlative) we ought to not use *any* shims or non-logical
On Tuesday 16 April 2002 03:44 pm, Brian Lloyd wrote:
...I sent out a note a while ago now trying to scare up
some ideas on how to vet the current list of 2.6 proposals
and get to a final plan. I didn't get much (any?) response :(
By the way, Brian, if I can with the remaining amount of
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 15:04, Shane Hathaway wrote:
There are a few products on zope.org for integrating with CVS. Look
through the downloadable products. I think there are CVSFolder and
ZCVSFile (or something like that), maybe more.
However, most version control tools are difficult to
I agree with Chris: *wow*!
[re the original explanation]
...
I'm sure I left a few things out, so ask questions about the unclear
parts.
Everything was wonderfully clear, except that the actual mechanism to
convert the nested tuples flexibly to RDBMS record sequences escaped me
a bit. This
Is anyone working on Jabber integration with Zope? I can think of some
nice use cases for this.
Gary
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
like Jabber that can be used over both desktop and
standard mobile devices seems very practical, exciting, and powerful.
Gary
Phil Harris wrote:
Gary,
It's been on my mind from time to time.
What sort of things can you see in your minds eye?
Phil
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 10:08:41 -0500, Gary
I would be very interested in taking a look. :-)
Too bad the jabber library you used is unmaintained.
Thanks
Gary
cguardia wrote:
I have used Zope+Jabber in the past, with an old version of a jabber library that seems to be unmaintained as of now. I copied the library code into a python
Interesting. Thanks.
Interesting also that they are no longer (or not yet?) listing it on
their products page.
Gary
Alastair Burt wrote:
Gary Poster [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-03-31):
Is anyone working on Jabber integration with Zope? I can think of some
nice use cases for this.
An Italian
more about the certification
please see http://www.commoncriteria.org
Stay zoped!
GARY POSTER (ZOPE CORPORATION): Zope 3 plus Zope 2
I have been working on integrating Zope 3 with Zope 2 on a Zope
Corporation customer project. The project leverages ZCML to only load
the parts of Zope 3
WELCOME TO THE ZOPE 3 NEWSLETTER: ISSUE 9 (25 JULY 2003)
Welcome to the ninth Zope 3 newsletter. Information about Zope 3
and newsletter contributions and suggestions can be found at the
bottom of this newsletter.
GLOSSARY FOR THE UNINITIATED
Encounter a term in this newsletter you
WELCOME TO THE ZOPE 3 NEWSLETTER: ISSUE 10 (5 SEPTEMBER 2003)
Welcome to the tenth Zope 3 newsletter. Information about Zope 3
and newsletter contributions and suggestions can be found at the
bottom of this newsletter.
GLOSSARY FOR THE UNINITIATED
Encounter a term in this newsletter you
WELCOME TO THE ZOPE 3 NEWSLETTER: ISSUE 11 (23 DECEMBER 2003)
Welcome to the eleventh Zope 3 newsletter. Information about Zope 3
and newsletter contributions and suggestions can be found at the
bottom of this newsletter.
GLOSSARY FOR THE UNINITIATED
Encounter a term in this newsletter
That sounds possible. I added support of Python 2.3 datetime, and while
I tried to handle alternate timezones correctly I may have failed. I'll
try to look at this later today.
Gary
Tres Seaver wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
I address you directly because I haven't received feedback on
Christian: I think I saw and fixed the problem, if your machine's local
time is GMT. Could you please cvs up the test and see if the issue is
resolved?
Thanks
Gary
Tres Seaver wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
I address you directly because I haven't received feedback on this from
the
Christian Theune wrote:
... the problem ... seems fixed by the changed
test.
Yay!
So I'll mark this as resolved in my mental collector. Thanks for
bringing this to my attention, and sorry it caused you grief.
Gary
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
+1
Jim Fulton wrote:
What do people think about alternative 4?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
Jim Fulton wrote:
Given that, I still prefer context#dc to context/##dc.
+1, also in preference to /# and the other options I've seen.
Gary
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or
SUMMARY:
The Zope.org Subversion repository now has a sandbox area for
collaboration by contributors. This area has no constraints for
checkins except those listed in the contributors agreement, and is
intended to promote experimentation and easy, quick sharing.
Details and how-to are below.
On May 30, 2005, at 3:06 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 30. Mai 2005 12:35:22 -0400 Chad Whitacre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear all,
I am wondering what mechanism the Zope team uses to manage the
copyright/license boilerplate at the top of every file. Is this
handled
manually or is
On Nov 23, 2005, at 10:16 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Sounds crazy, I know. But I'm serious. Looking for your comments at:
http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/
ReuniteZope2AndZope3InTheSourceCodeRepository
I already spoke with Philipp on IRC about this, but for the record,
and speaking
While I don't agree with the +1 voters, I understand and appreciate
their arguments. That said...
On Nov 23, 2005, at 6:49 PM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
People keep telling Zope2 developers that the inclusion of Zope3
doesn't mean you have to touch it, if you don't use it it is just
inert
On Nov 30, 2005, at 2:18 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
Zope 2 depends on Zope 3, via Five. Zope 3 does not depend on
Zope 2.
A very good point, but one which makes me feel that Zope 2
shouldn't be merged in with Zope 3 ;-)
Actually, yes, all of my points were made
On Dec 2, 2005, at 9:49 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
What test failed here?
Go to ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Linux
zc-buildbot.
This url:
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Click on the 'log' link for the failed test.
Zope Corp has released nine new packages as standalone Zope 3
projects on zope.org. Three are completely new to the zope.org
repository, and six were previously part of the zc Sandbox on zope.org.
These three packages are brand new to zope.org.
zc.shortcut
Our (second) take on the
On Feb 9, 2006, at 9:38 AM, Julien Anguenot wrote:
Hi there,
I worked on a Zope-2.9 branch of off the CVS HEAD for zasync this
week.
It over there:
http://svn.nuxeo.org/trac/pub/browser/vendor/zasync/branches/z29-nux/
awesome!
The customer is currently testing out an application using
On Feb 17, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
We'd have to declare the zope3-dev list for obsolete and make
people not
send messages to it. We'd just have to define a date and time. All
subsequent mail traffic would be handled by zope-dev.
Okay, who
On Feb 27, 2006, at 10:37 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
2) In an alternate vision, Zope 2 evolves to Zope 5.
Of the two, this seems more believable. It also may be the best we
can do. However, I still don't like it. :-)
- Zope 5 will be the application server generally known as
Zope. It
On Feb 28, 2006, at 9:30 AM, Benji York wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
So, my proposal would be to tone down the vision to what we have
already: a co-evolving Zope 3 and Zope 2, with Zope 2 following
and Zope 3 leading (or Zope 2 driving Zope 3 forward, however you
want to see it). No
On Feb 28, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Are you kidding?
No, I'm not kidding.
+1 to what Martijn said in this email (not quoting the whole thing to
save precious bandwith).
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
On Sep 8, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Grig Gheorghiu wrote:
Just thought I'd bring this to your attention:
http://agiletesting.blogspot.com/2006/09/pay-attention-to-new-with-
keyword.html
This is fixed in the 3.3 branch and the trunk. However, I don't know
of a distribution with the changes.
On Mar 1, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Hi All,
Wondering if someone could tell me the difference between an OOSet
and an OOTreeSet?
They seem to have different interfaces and yet seem to be used in
similar circumstances in PluginIndexes/common/UnIndex.py...
I'm looking for a
On Mar 1, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Hi Gary,
Gary Poster wrote:
What should I be using?
TreeSet.
Interesting, okay, so how should I work around this bogosity?
Is this a bug?
from BTrees.OOBTree import OOTreeSet,OOSet
for i in OOSet((1,2,3)): print i,
1 2 3
for i
On Mar 1, 2007, at 3:18 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in ?
TypeError: argument to reversed() must be a sequence
The fact that this works for the OOSet is an implementation accident.
As discussed elsewhere in this thread
On Mar 2, 2007, at 2:42 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
Okay, so I want a persistent, ordered sequence which is quick to
find items in and which doesn't re-store the whole sequence when
an item is inserted or removed.
What should I be using?
Ordered, as in sorted
On Jan 16, 2008, at 3:19 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
- can these proxies be used to keep track of a traversal path in
much the same way (although no seperate containment and context
chains needed) as the old Zope 2 acquisition wrappers did?
We generally assign
These changes sound great.
I just looked for your checkins in the checkins list. I didn't find
them. If I recall correctly, this usually happens if the committer is
not subscribed to the list and has not been blessed by an admin to let
the messages through anyway.
So, if I'm right, it
I did a five-minute skim of the checkin but hope to look a bit more
tomorrow. Hopefully Marius, Benji, Albertas, or someone else who has
actually done work on this package will take a look and chime in.
I did have one somewhat trivial thought. I generally prefer durations
and intervals
On Mar 10, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
[...]
Doctest/unittest holy war: bah. I've heard the arguments, I don't see
either side as perfect, and I've made my choice. I'm very fine with
others having different opinions and choices.
As Benji said
On Mar 11, 2008, at 5:01 PM, Matthew Grant wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 20:54 -0400, Gary Poster wrote:
I did have one somewhat trivial thought. I generally prefer
durations
and intervals expressed as datetime.timedeltas myself, because they
convey their meaning without having
On Apr 3, 2008, at 7:09 PM, Malthe Borch wrote:
On 04/04/2008, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
zope.security uses RestrictedPython, iirc...
For untrusted python, yes –– but is anyone using this (in Zope 3)?
Yup.
Gary
___
Zope-Dev
Hey Christian. Thanks for this. It would be nice to have a link from
this page to the failure output (to address works for me issues, as
well as for a quick triage).
Gary
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On Jun 6, 2008, at 7:44 AM, Gary Poster wrote:
Hey Christian. Thanks for this. It would be nice to have a link
from this page to the failure output (to address works for me
issues, as well as for a quick triage).
...but I found 'em by digging around on the site, so, mostly nevermind
On Jun 6, 2008, at 8:37 AM, Benji York wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've watched my buildbot send out notifications for a while and
pondered how
to make them available to more people.
We really need something like this. Thanks.
A
On Jun 6, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Fred Drake wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Benji York [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I avoided suggesting this earlier, but perhaps we need to define a
level
to run the tests at. Then buildbot could run all tests at level X
and
below and you could put the
Hi Juan.
Certainly we'd hate to see an unnecessary fork.
Are you a Zope Contributor?
I don't keep up with all the preferred mechanisms for external
contributors, so we'll ask around if not.
You'll have to make some license assignments (to Zope Foundation and
contributors, I believe) and
If you use the http://download.zope.org/ppix or http://download.zope.org/simple
indexes and try to get zope.app.authentication 3.4.3 (the newest),
you will get a 404 error.
Looking at PyPI and the zope.org index, it is evident why.
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zope.app.authentication/3.4.3
On Aug 14, 2008, at 4:32 PM, Christophe Combelles wrote:
Gary Poster a écrit :
If you use the http://download.zope.org/ppix or
http://download.zope.org/simple
indexes and try to get zope.app.authentication 3.4.3 (the newest),
you will get a 404 error.
Looking at PyPI and the zope.org
On Sep 18, 2008, at 4:02 PM, Benji York wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Thomas Lotze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lotze.de wrote:
The documentation of OrderedDict from zc.dict 1.2.1 states that the
current implementation is inefficient for large collections because
it
uses a PersistentList
On Sep 23, 2008, at 2:54 AM, Thomas Lotze wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
[zc.blist]
To release it responsibly now, someone needs to claim maintainership.
As I was the one asking in the first place, I'm willing to do this
Great! Thank you!
unless
there's a policy for zc.* packages
$ svn commit -m '[message omitted]'
Sendingsrc/zope/testbrowser/cookies.py
Sendingsrc/zope/testbrowser/cookies.txt
Transmitting file data ..svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: Can't create directory '/svn/repos/main/db/transactions/
92837-1.txn': Read-only file system
$ svn
On Dec 8, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Benji York wrote:
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Christian Zagrodnick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log message for revision 93722:
- Switched to Zope 3.4 KGS.
- New lines are no longer stripped in XML and HTML code contained
in a
textarea; requires
On Dec 8, 2008, at 12:23 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benji York wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Gary Poster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 8, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Benji York wrote:
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Christian Zagrodnick
Hi Thomas. Very cool that you are working on zc.dict + zc.blist.
The updateOrder API is a sucky API for blists, as I'm sure you've
realized. :-)
FWIW, I seem to recall that Plone has a reasonable-to-nice API for
changing order in containers, and the API would be able to take much
better
On Dec 23, 2008, at 2:11 PM, Thomas Lotze wrote:
Thomas Lotze t...@gocept.com schrieb:
Yes, and I think that we're talking about two steps here anyway. I'd
like to finish and release a version that uses BLists ASAP;
Well, I think the switch to BLists is finished, so I'd be ready to
merge
Hi all.
As announced elsewhere (and described in
https://dev.launchpad.net/OpenSourcing)
, Canonical's Launchpad project is working towards open-sourcing the
majority of the code base by this summer.
Prior and subsequent to the grand open-sourcing date, the Launchpad
developers are
On Jan 13, 2009, at 4:15 PM, Dan Korostelev wrote:
2009/1/14 Dan Korostelev nad...@gmail.com:
2009/1/13 Gary Poster gary.pos...@gmail.com:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/lazr.delegates
Provides an interesting Python delegation pattern. Uses
zope.interface.
I took a quick view
Hi all. There's some disagreement about how to resolve the bug below,
even though there's agreement that we want it resolved. Your input
would be appreciated so we can find a consensus and move forward with
a solution.
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/zope3/+bug/322486
Gary
As the author, +1 and thank you!
Gary
On Feb 8, 2009, at 11:18 AM, Dan Korostelev wrote:
Okay. I prepared the zope.copy package in the SVN for you to check
out what I mean. :)
2009/2/8 Dan Korostelev nad...@gmail.com:
After looking at the whole copy thing for some more time, I thought
On Feb 8, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Dan Korostelev wrote:
2009/2/9 Gary Poster gary.pos...@gmail.com:
As the author, +1 and thank you!
Glad to hear. I'll release the result of the merge soon.
BTW, I'd also like to make a final release of zc.copy, replacing its
code with dependencies/imports from
On Feb 9, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
Lots of things have happened in the Zope universe the last couple of
years, and are still happening, some of which are turning Zope inside
out, from a monolithic ghetto to a componentized agile speed monster.
People outside the Zope world
zope.testing trunk has five tests failing in Python 2.4.6 and four
failing in Python 2.5.4 (on self-compiled versions on Mac OS X).
Anyone know what the story is here?
Gary
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On Feb 16, 2009, at 3:11 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:17:06AM -0500, Gary Poster wrote:
zope.testing trunk has five tests failing in Python 2.4.6 and four
failing in Python 2.5.4 (on self-compiled versions on Mac OS X).
Anyone know what the story is here?
No clue
On Feb 17, 2009, at 7:55 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
Launchpad uses OpenID. We don't have that slated for abstraction
and open-sourcing immediately. However, most of the Launchpad code
(including this bit) is to be open-sourced by this summer,
abstracted
On Feb 19, 2009, at 2:07 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
I have the impression that you're talking past each other.
There are two ways of using OpenID:
* you can be an OpenID provider, i.e. accept logins with username
password and respond to authentication requests from other websites
[Thomas asked me to review his zc.dict branch a while ago.]
Hi Thomas. Thank you for this work. It looks great. I do have
several comments below (from an abbreviated diff against the current
trunk).
Index: buildout.cfg
Thank you for the huge effort you expended on this, Martijn.
You are right, with Jim taking a rest from his much-appreciated past
years as leader, no one is in a position to guide the Zope name. We
do have community leaders, such as yourself, but they are guiding
other names at the moment.
On Mar 3, 2009, at 7:35 AM, Martijn Pieters wrote:
...
And so far I haven't heard any better ideas than
what Martijn is proposing (no, leaving the status quo, deny there is a
problem and steer by majority is not a counter proposal in my view).
It may be that the idea needs some tweaking,
in my
proposed panarchy), if from a slightly different perspective.
Gary Poster wrote:
Moreover, if you are willing to step up and declare that you are
starting something called the Zope Framework that manages a known
good set of code, and you hope other projects and people join
On Mar 3, 2009, at 10:57 AM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Gary Poster wrote:
My mild counter proposal was this.
- The ZF formally institutes an easy way for people to start Zope
projects
- Hopefully, Martijn F. starts something like the project he
described
On Mar 4, 2009, at 2:20 AM, Thomas Lotze wrote:
Gary Poster gary.pos...@gmail.com schrieb:
Index: src/zc/dict/configure.zcml
===
--- src/zc/dict/configure.zcml (.../trunk) (revision 0)
+++ src/zc/dict/configure.zcml
On Mar 1, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
There's been some discussion recently about separating the interfaces
in zope.publisher from the implementations to facilitate other
implementations.
I think it would be great to standardize request and response APIs.
I'd love to see this
On Mar 5, 2009, at 6:38 AM, Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
And I am personally interested if the Zope 3 app server is something
that's
dying in favour for other projects (Plone/Grok) or is actively used.
Not clear on what you mean by the app server.
If you mean zope.publisher, no, I don't
On Mar 5, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
I know opinions are divergent about 'extra' dependencies in setup.py.
These ar dependencies that effectively make a single project with a
single dependency structure into a number of virtual packages that
each can have a separate
On Mar 6, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
Thanks Gary for sketching our the zc.async usecase. Note that zc.async
isn't in the Zope Framework at this point in time so it wouldn't be
directly affected by this policy, but it's still a useful usecase of
course.
Right,
On Mar 6, 2009, at 4:30 PM, Dan Korostelev wrote:
2009/3/6 Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hey,
Laurence Rowe wrote:
[snip]
It seems there is a 'tests_require'
One reason that isn't used is that apparently there
On Mar 9, 2009, at 5:20 PM, Dan Korostelev wrote:
Hi zope developers!
As you may know, python 3 introduced the concept of annotations for
callable objects. That annotations store information about arguments
and return values, which is kinda nice language feature that will
allow us to do
On Mar 16, 2009, at 4:02 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi,
I *think* this is a bug in zc.relationship, but I'm not quite sure.
I'm using ZODB3 3.8.1 (to get BLOB support) and trying to install
plone.app.relations, which depends on zc.relationship 1.0.2. In
particular, it subclasses
On Mar 16, 2009, at 8:39 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
On Mar 16, 2009, at 4:02 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi,
I *think* this is a bug in zc.relationship, but I'm not quite sure.
I'm using ZODB3 3.8.1 (to get BLOB support) and trying to install
plone.app.relations, which
On Mar 16, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi Gary,
zc.relationship 2.0 trunk is now essentially a wrapping of
zc.relation
code for backwards compatibility.
I see. But 2.0dev on pypi isn't?
What's the story behind zc.relation and the evolution of
zc.relationship?
Briefly, I
On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi Gary,
Thanks for being so helpful!
Happy to.
What's the difference between 1.1.1 and 2.0dev on pypi?
I intended that 1.1.1 would simply make the absolutely minimal
changes
necessary for you to be able to use the 1.1 branch. It
On Mar 16, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Dan Korostelev wrote:
2009/3/16 Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com:
There is a compromise I am willing to take. If package zope.bar
depends on a
*new feature* or *feature change* in zope.foo 1.3.x, then it
should specify
the version. In other words
On Mar 16, 2009, at 1:20 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
Hopefully. Do we know that zc.relationship 1.1 works with both ZODB
versions?
That would be a significant point of its existence, so I certainly
hope so. I'm 80%+ confident that it does, and would
On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:55 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
Yes, +1. Thank you. I was about to write to your other message that
this was quite possibly the only 3.8 dependency.
Cool. Committed.
If we do that, then we can let plone.relations depend on
zc.relationship
1.1.1
On Mar 25, 2009, at 11:52 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Hi Martijn,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Martijn Faassen
faas...@startifact.com wrote:
One question is what launchpad project we should use.
The current launchpad is for Zope 3. The steering group isn't about
Zope 3. It's about a
On Mar 24, 2009, at 6:12 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Hey All,
Who's around at PyCon? If so, when/where are we meeting up?
Arriving Thursday evening, leaving following Thursday afternoon. I'm
starting at the Hyatt, going to the Crowne Plaza on Monday.
Email is maybe the best public way to get
On Mar 25, 2009, at 2:21 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Hi Martijn,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Martijn Faassen
faas...@startifact.com wrote:
One question is what launchpad project we should use.
The current launchpad is for Zope 3. The steering group isn't
On Apr 2, 2009, at 1:31 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Hey All,
...
The other option would be to follow Python and move to Mercurial, but
that has the same problems for me as with Bzr (no decent gui tools,
less
mature, etc) although it's a toolset I'll have to learn at some point
anyway...
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
