> > It would be great if you could do it, but beware that you will be
> > benchmarking a lot of overhead if you only plan to measure storage
> > performance. Why not use ZODB directly ?
>
> If I talk HTTP, it measures things fully - Python's interpreter lock
> will mean a storage system written i
ZPublisher/soap.py Thu Jan 1 02:00:00 1970
+++ soap-zope/lib/python/ZPublisher/soap.py Thu Jun 22 01:23:12 2000
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+"""SOAP support module
+
+Written by Petru Paler
+
+Based on the XML-RPC Zope support module written by Eric Kidd at UserLand
+software, w
Hi,
I received zero feedback on the SOAP support patch I sent a few days ago...
I no one is interested I guess I should just forget about it and find something
else more interesting ?
-Petru
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 10:34:50PM -0400, Evan Simpson wrote:
> I've barely had a free second with functioning brain capacity this past
> week, but I'm interested. More so now that Secret Labs has announced their
> SOAP client library at http://www.pythonware.com/products/soap If you
That ma
python probably) and placed at the
top of DTML documents/methods).
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross p
ain about a truncated transaction at a certain offset, write
that down and truncate Data.fs again at exactly that offset and you should
be ok.
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAI
lcome, but wanted :)
-Petru
##
#
# Zope Public License (ZPL) Version 1.0
# -
#
# Copyright (c) Digital Creations. All rights reserved.
# Copyright (c) 2000 Petru Paler ([
Hello all,
You probably saw my yesterday post with the first alpha of
ReiserStorage. One of the questions that people tend to ask about it is
wheter they can use it without reiserfs.
There are two problems with not using reiserfs:
1. ReiserStorage (now renamed to DirectoryStorage
> This is the embodiment of my MutliFileStorage thingy on Jim's ZODB Wiki. I
Oops, didn't saw the ZODB Wiki until now :)
> droped it (Never picked it up) when Mountable Storage was announced. I'll
> create a ReierFS partition some time this week and try it out. Excellent!
Glad you find
> >Glad you find it interesting :)
>
> Very. I think the line between FileSYstem and Database gets more blurred
> every day.
That's what Hans Reiser says all the time :)
> Thanks for the heads up. I have to patch my kernel up to 2.2.11 first,
> then I'll be recompiling, then creating. I
> From my naive understanding, would this help with the problem ZODB has
> with regard to folders with many objects? Would a person who is using
> DirectoryStorage not necessarily be required to partition their objects
> into an artificially derived hierarchical directory structure?
No, these
> > Hello all,
> >
> > You probably saw my yesterday post with the first alpha of
> >ReiserStorage.
>
> Woohoo!
>
> Id like to try this on NT with NTFS too (which has similar performance
> characteristics with big directories and small files). Do you think
> this is worth a try, or do
ials to an gdbm database
0.02:
- converted to using os.path.join
0.01:
- initial release
-Petru
# Copyright (c) 2000 Petru Paler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) All rights reserved.
# To-do list:
# Critical:
#- Most I/O operations are not atomic. This means that I/O errors (and, for
#
> M. I suspect NTs heavier file security checks will prove to be a
> significant disadvantage - benchmarks to follow.
If you do benchmarks, you should do them comparing
DirectoryStorage/NTFS to DirectoryStorage/reiserfs, because (at least at
mass object creation) DirectoryStorage is slower
> I don't have the two on comparable machines :-(
>
> Do you have a standard benchmark for comparing the relative performance
> FileStorage/DirectoryStorage on reiser fs?
Not yet. I have been using a script which just creates/retrieves
objects from the ODB but I guess something more serious
> I'd love some sort of benchmarking tool for this (and posibly other
> Storages). I guess the best way would a python script that uses urllib.
> Something that would algorithmically pump up the DB to > 1GB in size
> and retrieve the URL's. Any volunteers or am I doing it in my
> copious spare ti
yright (c) 2000 Petru Paler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) All rights reserved.
# To-do list:
# Critical:
#- Most I/O operations are not atomic. This means that I/O errors (and, for
#that matter, any exceptions occured in _finish) leave the storage in an
#undefined state
#
17 matches
Mail list logo
