Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Server hanging :-(

2001-06-06 Thread Richard Jones
to find the bad except: and submit a patch... Richard -- Richard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Software Developer, Bizar Software (www.bizarsoftware.com.au) ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev

Re: [Zope-dev] ZPL and GPL

2001-06-25 Thread Richard Jones
man-years in the code, and we're not about to just give that away. Our investors would string us up! Richard -- Richard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Software Developer, Bizar Software (www.bizarsoftware.com.au) ___ Zope-Dev maillist

[Zope-dev] Zope on Windows: enhancements proposed

2001-09-24 Thread Richard Jones
We've got a wonderful zope control panel (which installs into the standard windows Control Panel) and zope service which we'll be making available in binary and source form this week. Like the Mac OS X controller, this is simply a trivial re-branding extension of our work in supporting the

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope on Windows: enhancements proposed

2001-09-24 Thread Richard Jones
On Tuesday 25 September 2001 14:23, Andy wrote: We'd like to propose that the service distributed with Zope move over to using our code. Great, Im really looking forward to an improved Windows installation. But lets get it out there play with it before anything major happens like shipping

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope on Windows: enhancements proposed

2001-09-25 Thread Richard Jones
On Tuesday 25 September 2001 16:26, Adrian Hungate wrote: I have to disagree about the Zope (%s), I have been known to run 2 or 3 Zope services, for different instances, and I always know that I can find them all huddled together at the bottom of the Service Manager - Very useful. So does

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope on Windows: enhancements proposed

2001-09-25 Thread Richard Jones
On Tuesday 25 September 2001 16:41, Adrian Hungate wrote: I edit the registry... One of my many favourite pass-times, right up there with running out in traffic. Seriously though, once an instance is configured, why would you want to change it? (Assuming you get it right that is) Mostly the

Re: [Zope-dev] Distributing Zope one of our products

2001-09-26 Thread Richard Jones
On Thursday 27 September 2001 00:37, Simon Coles wrote: But of course at the moment we have to get them to: - install Zope - get, expand, and install the CMF (which is distributed as a .tgz, rather confounding Windows users) - get our product and expand/install

[Zope-dev] Zope on Windows/Mac OS X: BatteriesIncludedDistribution

2001-09-26 Thread Richard Jones
I've just created the follwing fishbowl proposal: http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/BatteriesIncludedDistribution Please read and comment. Richard ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope on Windows/Mac OS X: BatteriesIncludedDistribution

2001-09-30 Thread Richard Jones
On Friday 28 September 2001 22:05, Paul Everitt wrote: Whew, what a proposal and what a good sign! As several have noted, there are quite a few proposals in the fishbowl that deal with different aspects of the problems. There's also a draft proposal that we had here in ZC that expands on

Re: [Zope-dev] file descriptors on Solaris [SUMMARY]

2001-10-02 Thread Richard Jones
On Wednesday 03 October 2001 04:50, John Ziniti wrote: DIAGNOSIS: It appears that this only happens when the form is specified with enctype=multipart/form-data. In that case, Zope (or, more accurately, the cgi module), tries to create temporary file for each form input, no matter what type

Re: [Zope-dev] file descriptors on Solaris - IT'S A BUG, PEOPLE!

2001-10-03 Thread Richard Jones
On Wednesday 03 October 2001 22:00, R. David Murray wrote: On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, John Ziniti wrote: Yeah ... something tells me it's a little more complicated than that. Like recompiling the kernel, quite possibly. On FreeBSD there's a sysctl, although you may still have to recompile the

Re: [Zope-dev] file descriptors on Solaris - IT'S A BUG, PEOPLE!

2001-10-03 Thread Richard Jones
[cc'ed to zope-dev so people can check this information] On Thursday 04 October 2001 13:47, Joseph Wayne Norton wrote: One related question that I have regarding cgi.py and zope. Would there be any compatibility problem of applying the following older cgi hotfix to python's cgi.py file and

Re: [Zope-dev] compilezpy (compileall)

2001-11-20 Thread Richard Jones
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 15:12, Danny William Adair wrote: I wondered if this (see subject) was totally necessary during the installation. My Zope installation seems to run fine when I delete all the *.pyc and just start it. Obviously it runs slower the first time, but that's all I can

Re: [Zope-dev] compilezpy (compileall)

2001-11-20 Thread Richard Jones
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 16:34, Danny William Adair wrote: As from what I know (leaving aside for a moment that I basically know nothing), Zope should be _started_ as root, but then be _running_ as nobody. This does make sense to me, in a couple of ways. :-) Do you know when or where

Re: [Zope-dev] compilezpy (compileall)

2001-11-21 Thread Richard Jones
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 19:49, Danny William Adair wrote: On Wednesday 21 November 2001 18:41, Richard Jones wrote: On Wednesday 21 November 2001 16:34, Danny William Adair wrote: As from what I know (leaving aside for a moment that I basically know nothing), Zope should

Re: SV: [Zope-dev] Fishbowl?

2001-12-03 Thread Richard Jones
On Saturday 01 December 2001 02:29, Magnus Heino wrote: 3. We could use another open source tool. Bugzilla springs to mind. Yes, it's not Zope, or even python, but it does work, certainly better than anything we, as a community, have right now or could build in the time it would take to

Re: [Zope-dev] Roundup?

2001-12-04 Thread Richard Jones
On Wednesday 05 December 2001 04:01, Chris Withers wrote: Richard Jones wrote: plug http://roundup.sf.net/ ... is in heavy development, but is also being used right now. /plug Well, it's written in Python, so probably a good candidate. Could it be integrated into Zope

[Zope-dev] Call Profiler

2002-01-31 Thread Richard Jones
I've just announced our Call Profiler product on zope.org and the zope announce list (waiting for people in different timezones to authorise them :) ( http://www.zope.org/Members/richard/CallProfiler/ for the impatient) In a nutshell, it patches the rendering guts of DTMLMethod, ZSQL, etc.

Re: [Zope-dev] Call Profiler

2002-01-31 Thread Richard Jones
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 14:10, Anthony Baxter wrote: Richard Jones wrote I've just announced our Call Profiler product on zope.org and the zope announce list (waiting for people in different timezones to authorise them :) ( http://www.zope.org/Members/richard/CallProfiler

Re: [Zope-dev] Call Profiler

2002-02-03 Thread Richard Jones
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 21:53, seb bacon wrote: I wrote: I've just announced our Call Profiler product on zope.org and the zope announce list (waiting for people in different timezones to authorise them :) ( http://www.zope.org/Members/richard/CallProfiler/ for the impatient) This is

Re: [Zope-dev] Call Profiler

2002-02-04 Thread Richard Jones
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002 21:42, seb bacon wrote: On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 21:58, Richard Jones wrote: On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 21:53, seb bacon wrote: I wrote: I've just announced our Call Profiler product on zope.org and the zope announce list (waiting for people in different timezones

Re: [Zope-dev] Benchmarks: DTML vs. ZPT?

2002-02-07 Thread Richard Jones
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 20:53, seb bacon wrote: Hi! It wouldn't surprise me - ZPT has the roughly the same overheads as DTML for the language parsing, but a presentation template goes through an HTML parser in addition - which is always going to be quite slow in python. That's only during

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-02-28 Thread Richard Jones
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002 15:17, Eric Roby wrote: Let's get a discussion started to define 2.6 I'd like to see the ZSyncer Product, or a variant thereof, included in Zope by default. That is, I'd like Synchronization, to a be a default property of Zope objects, so that

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-03-03 Thread Richard Jones
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002 21:25, seb bacon wrote: Absolutely ... and I would also like to see Richards excellent Call Profiler service become part of the core. I'm definitely putting the profiler into 2.6 - there's just an open question of where it gets put. The question was asked on

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-03-03 Thread Richard Jones
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002 14:40, Casey Duncan wrote: I agree, monkey patches are perfect for this. That makes them totally transparent to the application and Zope for that matter. There's nothing wrong with them in the right application. My main concern is the use of monkeypatching in the core

Re: [Zope-dev] MonkeyPatching in the Core (was: Zope 2.6 planning)

2002-03-04 Thread Richard Jones
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002 07:20, Brian Lloyd wrote: Seb wrote: Pros - a tiny performance gain Cons - unpredictable interaction with future products; not a well-known method of distributing products; not easily discoverable What if, instead of the static list of callable info that the CP

[Zope-dev] CallProfiler (was: MonkeyPatching in the Core (was: Zope 2.6 planning))

2002-03-04 Thread Richard Jones
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002 10:54, Adrian Hungate wrote: The call profiler seems to be a very popular feature, and it seems to provide very useful information. It's not rock solid yet (I am sure I even remember it's author saying this a day or so ago) Any idea what I might have been referring to? I

Re: [Zope-dev] Structured text issues (again?)

2002-03-20 Thread Richard Jones
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 08:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How extensively is STX actually used? I've been looking at it myself recently, and the whole system seem rather simplistic to me in how it parses the text. I'm talking specifically of the STX version currently standard in Zope 2.5 (and 2.4

[Zope-dev] Call Profiler strangeness - lots of ZODB transactions

2002-03-25 Thread Richard Jones
I'm investigating why our product ZODB is growing when it shouldn't. I've found that the undo log has entries in it every five minutes saying Installed product CallProfiler by Zope. More infrequently (not regularly) we also have Installed product ZOracleDA by Zope. The Call Profiler was

Re: [Zope-dev] Call Profiler strangeness - lots of ZODB transactions

2002-04-08 Thread Richard Jones
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 21:29, Toby Dickenson wrote: On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:30:56 +1100, Richard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm investigating why our product ZODB is growing when it shouldn't. I've found that the undo log has entries in it every five minutes saying Installed product

Re: [Zope-dev] Call Profiler strangeness - lots of ZODB transactions

2002-04-08 Thread Richard Jones
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002 09:27, Richard Jones wrote: On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 21:29, Toby Dickenson wrote: On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:30:56 +1100, Richard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm investigating why our product ZODB is growing when it shouldn't. I've found that the undo log has entries

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [OT] digital signature

2002-04-25 Thread Richard Jones
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 02:02, Lennart Regebro wrote: I want a *good* mail program. :-/ I recommend KMail for those who prefer a GUI reader. http://kmail.kde.org/ It boasts an impressive list of features, including the invaluable SSL POP and SMTP connections and really well-integrated

Re: [Zope-dev] Future of StructuredText

2002-09-04 Thread Richard Jones
[courtesy cc send to David G, so if I make any blatantly errneous statements he can come chase me with the Big Stick :)] On Wed, 4 Sep 2002 8:01 pm, Max M wrote: Andreas Jung wrote: I would be fine to have reStructuredText inside the Zope core (for 2.7) and to deprecate the current

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Future of StructuredText

2002-09-04 Thread Richard Jones
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 2:24 am, Simon Michael wrote: Andreas Jung wrote: I would be fine to have reStructuredText inside the Zope core (for 2.7) and to deprecate the current StructuredText in the long run. My two cents - there are some things in rST I would like to have but I think it has

[Zope-dev] Re: Future of StructuredText

2002-09-05 Thread Richard Jones
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 1:23 pm, Simon Michael wrote: Simon Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The doc I read listed a large number of rules, including many that seemed to want to exert more control over my text than they should. (I had a I tracked it down - it was the example rST PEP posted in

[Zope-dev] Re: Reports of CallProfiler not working with Zope 2.5.x were greatly exagerated :-) (was Re: CallProfiler?)

2002-10-17 Thread Richard Jones
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 6:07 am, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote: CallProfiler wasn't profiling ZPTs because they've been renamed/moved from Products.PageTemplates.PageTemplates.PageTemplates to Products.PageTemplates.ZopePageTemplate.ZopePageTemplate. Here's a patch to make it work again. I'll

Re: [Zope-dev] Creating a fully stand-alone Zope Page Templates

2003-02-24 Thread Richard Jones
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:07 am, Kevin Smith wrote: I am trying to make a stand-alone Page Templates packages that doesn't have any Zope dependencies. I was able to short circuit security and acquisition. I re-implemented MultiMapping in plain Python and made the Base class just an empty class.

Re: [Zope-dev] Creating a fully stand-alone Zope Page Templates

2003-02-25 Thread Richard Jones
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 1:26 am, Kevin Smith wrote: This works!! Thank you! Do you keep your Page Templates up-to-date with Zope's, or is this version going to stay the way it is from now on? It looks like you did what I was trying to do (i.e. put a wrapper around the existing code) so that

Re: [Zope-dev] Creating a fully stand-alone Zope Page Templates

2003-02-25 Thread Richard Jones
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 1:53 am, Guido van Rossum wrote: Hurm. I can't answer this directly, but I have done the same as you and divorced ZPT completely from Zope for Roundup. See http://roundup.sf.net/ in the roundup.cgi.[PageTemplates|TAL|ZTUtils] packages. I wonder if it would be worth our

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: DBtab and BDBStorage

2003-06-06 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, June 6, 2003, at 06:17 AM, Shane Hathaway wrote: - Use ZEO. It makes starting/stopping Zope much faster and isolates the application from the database. I've noticed that this pattern doesn't hold with Zope 2.7 as it currently stands. Even

Re: [Zope-dev] ZEO install/runtime issues

2003-05-29 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, May 28, 2003, at 04:38 AM, Jeremy Hylton wrote: [Please followup to zodb-dev.] You made some changes to the mkzeoinst.py script in April. I was busy then, and I've just had a chance to look at the changes now. I'd like to discuss some

Re: FHS, zopectl, #925, Re: [Zope-dev] 2.7 installation

2003-06-19 Thread Richard Jones
On Friday 20 June 2003 01:19 am, Jean Jordaan wrote: There's only one possible way! A-A-P! (A good match for Ape, Shane ;) It's a replacement for make by Bram Moolenaar, the author of Vim, and it looks like it does a lot of things Right. Sorry, I haven't really been paying attention so this

Re: FHS, zopectl, #925, Re: [Zope-dev] 2.7 installation

2003-06-20 Thread Richard Jones
On Friday 20 June 2003 04:57 pm, PieterB wrote: On Friday 20 June 2003 01:19 am, Jean Jordaan wrote: There's only one possible way! A-A-P! (A good match for Ape, Shane ;) It's a replacement for make by Bram Moolenaar, the author of Vim, and it looks like it does a lot of things Right.

[Zope-dev] PageTemplateFiles considered anonymous?

2003-06-30 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 PageTemplateFiles don't have an id attribute set when they're created - - they have a __name__ instead. This causes functions like getPhysicalPath (and the related absolute_url) to break in fun ways :) The SimpleItem.Item_w__name__ mixin was created

[Zope-dev] More on the getId issue...

2003-06-30 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In my last email, I said Also, is there a reason why Item_w__name__ doesn't define getId() when it does define _setId()? This question doesn't really capture the essence of the problem. In a nutshell, the following happened... PageTemplateFile (via

Re: [Zope-dev] More on the getId issue...

2003-07-04 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, July 5, 2003, at 04:50 AM, Dieter Maurer wrote: Richard Jones wrote at 2003-7-1 12:03 +1000: ... PageTemplateFile (via Script and SimpleItem) inherits Item. This class has an attribute id set to '' by default. PageTemplateFiles don't use

[Zope-dev] TALES idea: tuple unpacking

2003-07-22 Thread Richard Jones
During the Melbourne Zope3 Sprint, someone ran up against a situation where they'd have liked to have TALES perform a tuple unpacking like Python can. I've just run into a similar situation :) Say a method listFilesByUser returns a list of (user, [files]) it'd be nice to be able to::

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: TALES idea: tuple unpacking

2003-07-29 Thread Richard Jones
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 06:16 am, Evan Simpson wrote: OK, I've checked in a sample implementation on evan-pathprefix-branch. It allows for registering prefixes with: This seems very nice. I'm not likely to actually have a chance to play with it any time soon though, so I can't really comment on

[Zope-dev] Very fast requests beating ZODB commits...

2003-10-13 Thread Richard Jones
I'm seeing the following behaviour in Zope2.7b2 (python 2.3.2) on a relatively fast computer (Athlon 1.8GHz): 1. request comes in which modifies ZODB 2. code handling request replies with REQUEST.RESPONSE.redirect() 3. redirected page uses data input at step 1 (specifically, it's auth info)

Re: [Zope-dev] Very fast requests beating ZODB commits...

2003-10-14 Thread Richard Jones
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 02:25 pm, Richard Jones wrote: 1. request comes in which modifies ZODB 2. code handling request replies with REQUEST.RESPONSE.redirect() 3. redirected page uses data input at step 1 (specifically, it's auth info) but that info hasn't been committed yet, so we get errors

Re: [Zope-dev] How to make Zope fail nicely under high load?

2004-02-11 Thread Richard Jones
On Thursday 12 February 2004 01:23, Casey Duncan wrote: What kinds of requests are these? Do they all require a dynamic output? If not, then you should put better caching in front of Zope, or at a minimum tweak you caching headers so that some could be served as 304s for instance. If they

[Zope-dev] Zope 2.7 and objects turning into None

2004-02-19 Thread Richard Jones
On Friday 20 February 2004 05:52, Dieter Maurer wrote: We have a report for Zope 2.7 about an object magically turning into None (1 or 2 weeks ago). Sorry, I haven't been following this thread, but I will note that I've seen (repeatably) in my test Zope environment this behaviour. This is

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Zope 2.7 and objects turning into None

2004-02-22 Thread Richard Jones
On Saturday 21 February 2004 06:04, Casey Duncan wrote: This is indeed possible. getObject swallows all errors and returns None when one occurs. This would make it return None on busy systems if the traversal during getObject raised a read ConflictError. This would indeed result in the

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: ZPT for CSS, anyone?

2004-04-02 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 02 Apr 2004 18:44, Chris Withers wrote: Ah, okay, I think building something purely for CSS would REALLY suck. Something which could generically build SQL, CSS, Emails I would be less lielyl to vomit about... [snip] So persuade the

Re: [Zope-dev] How should an ideal Zope IDE look like?

2004-04-24 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 24 Apr 2004 09:13, Andre Meyer wrote: - Commenting/uncommenting code (any hope Python will ever offer multi-line comments?). ''' this_code_is_commented_out() so_is_this() ''' Well, there is certainly more, but this is a start... ;-)

Re: [Zope-dev] [Zope Enhancement Proposal] Sanitizing local roles

2004-07-23 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 03:30 am, Dieter Maurer wrote: Moreover, I propose to change the local role management pages. When setting local roles, information about acquired local role definitions is very helpful. I therefore propose to display this

[Zope-dev] More POSKeyErrors than I know what to do with

2004-08-03 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Our 2.7.1-based production server has started throwing up a lot of POSKeyErrors recently. Forcing regeneration of the Data.fs.index didn't fix it. Packing didn't fix it or generate any new errors - we haven't packed the database since it went live.

[Zope-dev] 2.7 branch: attribute permission problems

2004-09-14 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [might dupe - sent the first copy of this from the wrong address, sorry!] I've just upgraded to use the bleeding-edge 2-7 branch (from 2.7.2, running in py 2.3.3) and I've started getting permission problems with attributes. The cause appears to be

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.7 branch: attribute permission problems

2004-09-14 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:15 pm, Chris McDonough wrote: On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 21:18, Richard Jones wrote: On the proposals object though, we don't have any delaration for the secure_url attribute. If I add one, or a general

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.7 branch: attribute permission problems

2004-09-14 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:36 pm, Chris McDonough wrote: Yep, that's the situation. It appears to look for the security assertions for secure_url on A instead of B. Note that secure_url is an attribute of B. Yup. IOW, it looks like it used to

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.7 branch: attribute permission problems

2004-09-14 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 01:00 pm, Chris McDonough wrote: I'd just stick the code back in there for now and we'll see what Tres says. This is what I've done to speed up my testing, rather than fixing all the places stuff is broken. I'll be testing for

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.7 branch: attribute permission problems

2004-09-20 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15/09/2004, at 1:00 PM, Chris McDonough wrote: I'd just stick the code back in there for now and we'll see what Tres says. No word from Tres, 2.7 branch release coming up... Richard -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.7 branch: attribute permission problems

2004-09-22 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:40 am, Chris McDonough wrote: Would you be able to write a short test case that demonstrates the failure mode that you're seeing in your existing code? It would be nice to understand the failure before blindly reenabling the

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.7 branch: attribute permission problems

2004-09-22 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:14 pm, Chris McDonough wrote: Alright, well, in the meantime, I think we're going to release the beta with the aq_acquire DWIM removed and if it causes other folks problems we'll be able to tell from folks using the beta

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.7.3 beta attribute permission problems

2004-10-19 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 19/10/2004, at 4:33 PM, Santi Camps wrote: Yes, meta_type is an attribute of type string, but I don't understand your reasons. Acquisition, obviously, is not implemented in strings, but if the object containing meta_type attribute inherits from

Re: [Zope-dev] session error

2004-10-19 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 04:23 am, Gerry Kirk wrote: A user got this error trying to edit content. It only happened once, and on second try she was ok. Using Zope 2.7.0: 2.7.3 (currently beta, but live on our production server) fixes errors of this

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Was: Re: 2.7.3 beta attribute permission problems

2004-10-23 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 08:03 am, Tres Seaver wrote: Richard Jones reported an issue with the patch, but couldn't give us a simple case. Users who *have* such weird applications can reverse the patch, find workarounds, or whatever, until they can help

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Was: Re: 2.7.3 beta attribute permission problems

2004-10-24 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 10:29 pm, Stefan H. Holek wrote: On 22.10.2004, at 14:38, Tres Seaver wrote: Given that the change was required to implement a security fix, and without a reproducible test case for the reported breakage, I don't think we

Re: [Zope-dev] SOAP Support for ZOPE

2004-12-14 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 06:54 am, Aruna Kathiria wrote: I did some work regarding SOAP support on ZOPE and published this document on zope.org. Is there really no interest in getting SOAP support into the Zope core? I've got a guy working on some

Re: [Zope-dev] More on [Removal of aq_acquire from guarded_getattr]

2005-02-06 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:30 am, Stefan H. Holek wrote: - declaring object security on the acquiree via declareObjectProtected(foo) For me, the problem arises when the acquiree is a Python builtin object - a string instance attribute in my case.

Re: [Zope-dev] More on [Removal of aq_acquire from guarded_getattr]

2005-02-06 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 05:26 pm, Richard Jones wrote: That is, there's no acquisition context on the simple string. To fix the problem, I changed secure_url to be a ComputedAttribute which looked up the instance attribute _secure_url. This then gave

Re: [Zope-dev] I want Zope 2.9 to use Zope 3's security architecture.

2005-04-06 Thread Richard Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 02:49 am, Jim Fulton wrote: Paul Winkler wrote: i.e. will I still write: security.declareProtected(SomePermission, 'foo') def foo(self): ... That will work, and I don't see a need to deprecate it.

[Zope-dev] Puzzling change to guarded_getitem in Zope 2.8

2005-08-25 Thread Richard Jones
I'm migrating our 2.7-developed Product to 2.8. The following change has me puzzled. In 2.7, AccessControl.ZopeGuards guarded_getitem has the following code: def guarded_getitem(object, index): [ snip handling of slices ] ... v = object[index] if Containers(type(object)) and

Re: [Zope-dev] Puzzling change to guarded_getitem in Zope 2.8

2005-08-25 Thread Richard Jones
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:00 am, Richard Jones wrote: I'm migrating our 2.7-developed Product to 2.8. The following change has me puzzled. In 2.7, AccessControl.ZopeGuards guarded_getitem has the following code: OK, Tres made the change, with the relevant bit of the log message being

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.9.4? reStructuredText support?

2006-07-16 Thread Richard Jones
On Sunday 09 July 2006 22:56, Jim Fulton wrote: Whoever integrated reST didn't even read the documentation, much less the code. FWIW. The ZReST product was originally released by me around 2002 - before those directives existed. According to the docutils HISTORY file, the directives