Martijn Faassen wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 2. Juli 2005 20:52:54 +0200 Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I wonder whether it's possible to expose zope 3's authentication system
to Zope 2, though that may be too much of a mismatch between security
systems.
Wasn't that a
Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's something else that would be nice: PAS.
Maybe not right at this moment... but I would like to see that, too.
I wonder whether it's possible to expose zope 3's authentication system
to Zope 2, though that may be too much of a mismatch
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 2. Juli 2005 20:52:54 +0200 Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I wonder whether it's possible to expose zope 3's authentication system
to Zope 2, though that may be too much of a mismatch between security
systems.
Wasn't that a major goal of Jim for Z
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 1 Jul 2005, at 17:15, Florent Guillaume wrote:
Here's something else that would be nice: PAS.
Although it hasn't been tested much, so we should include it as
early as possible in the 2.9 cycle (i.e., why not now ? :)
Maybe not right at this moment... but I would
I'd like to propose/sponsor/promise-to-finish the following for
inclusion in 2.9. If anyone has fears/doubts/problems with specific
things, please let me know. I can also start a 2.9 project on the wiki
with this info; if other folks have features they want, maybe they can
post them here and we
Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to propose/sponsor/promise-to-finish the following for
inclusion in 2.9. If anyone has fears/doubts/problems with specific
things, please let me know. I can also start a 2.9 project on the wiki
with this info; if other folks have features
Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to propose/sponsor/promise-to-finish the following for
inclusion in 2.9.
Here's something else that would be nice: PAS.
Although it hasn't been tested much, so we should include it as early as
possible in the 2.9 cycle (i.e., why not now ? :)
On 1 Jul 2005, at 17:15, Florent Guillaume wrote:
Here's something else that would be nice: PAS.
Although it hasn't been tested much, so we should include it as
early as
possible in the 2.9 cycle (i.e., why not now ? :)
Maybe not right at this moment... but I would like to see that, too.
