Zope will always fare badly in comparison to web servers that dont serve
dynamic content. Zope's delivery will probably never be as fast as
serving up static pages from the filesystem ala Apache or AOLServer.
This is one of the reasons for ZEO. One of the other things in the
wings that's being talked about on some Wiki somewhere is to build
better caching in.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Weholt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 6:06 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [Zope-dev] Comments on Zopes performance-article??
http://weblogs.userland.com/qube/2000/06/26
Just found this article were Zope scores really bad, - compared to the
competition that is.
Any comments? How can Zope improve performance in the future?
I know Zope has alot of other good qualities, at least
compared to Apache,
but performance tends to be the thing that tips the scale
when people chose
platform, so how will this affect Zope?
Thomas
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
