Re: [Zope-dev] Draft of new aggregator

2010-12-01 Thread Christian Theune
On 12/01/2010 03:17 PM, Benji York wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:04 AM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote: >> If I understood Christian right he wants to keep the full list of >> entries sorted so everyone knows where to find their items of interest >> quickly. I think that's valuable, the full list should

Re: [Zope-dev] Draft of new aggregator

2010-12-01 Thread Benji York
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:04 AM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote: > If I understood Christian right he wants to keep the full list of > entries sorted so everyone knows where to find their items of interest > quickly. I think that's valuable, the full list should stay as it is. +1 Perhaps even a blank line

Re: [Zope-dev] Draft of new aggregator

2010-12-01 Thread Adam GROSZER
Hello Christian, Wednesday, December 1, 2010, 7:43:20 AM, you wrote: CT> Here's the draft we ended up with yesterday: CT> http://dpaste.com/281566/ When do you intend to switch to that? My eyes just hurt looking at the old one. -- Best regards, Adam GROSZERmailto:a

Re: [Zope-dev] Draft of new aggregator

2010-12-01 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/1/10 09:28 , Wichert Akkerman wrote: > On 12/1/10 09:04 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote: >> On 12/1/10 08:59 , Wichert Akkerman wrote: >>> On 2010-12-1 07:43, Christian Theune wrote: Here's the draft we ended up with yesterday: http://dpaste.com

Re: [Zope-dev] Draft of new aggregator

2010-12-01 Thread Wichert Akkerman
On 12/1/10 09:04 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 12/1/10 08:59 , Wichert Akkerman wrote: >> On 2010-12-1 07:43, Christian Theune wrote: >>> Here's the draft we ended up with yesterday: >>> http://dpaste.com/281566/ >> >> Can you move the non-OK resul

Re: [Zope-dev] Draft of new aggregator

2010-12-01 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/1/10 08:59 , Wichert Akkerman wrote: > On 2010-12-1 07:43, Christian Theune wrote: >> Here's the draft we ended up with yesterday: >> http://dpaste.com/281566/ > > Can you move the non-OK results above the list of reports received? That > way y

Re: [Zope-dev] Draft of new aggregator

2010-11-30 Thread Wichert Akkerman
On 2010-12-1 07:43, Christian Theune wrote: > On 11/30/2010 06:04 PM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 11/30/10 16:06 , Christian Theune wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> here's a shot at a new format of the aggregated mails. >>> >>> My focus on this draft was

Re: [Zope-dev] Draft of new aggregator

2010-11-30 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/1/10 07:43 , Christian Theune wrote: > On 11/30/2010 06:04 PM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote: >> Looks good to me, much better than what we have now. I'm guessing the >> URLs will be fixed to point to http://mail.zope.org... instead of >> file:///tmp/mail

Re: [Zope-dev] Draft of new aggregator

2010-11-30 Thread Christian Theune
On 11/30/2010 06:04 PM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/30/10 16:06 , Christian Theune wrote: >> Hi, >> >> here's a shot at a new format of the aggregated mails. >> >> My focus on this draft was: >> >> - allow dealing with *lots* of results every da

Re: [Zope-dev] Draft of new aggregator

2010-11-30 Thread Christian Theune
On 11/30/2010 06:04 PM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/30/10 16:06 , Christian Theune wrote: >> Hi, >> >> here's a shot at a new format of the aggregated mails. >> >> My focus on this draft was: >> >> - allow dealing with *lots* of results every da

Re: [Zope-dev] Draft of new aggregator

2010-11-30 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/30/10 16:06 , Christian Theune wrote: > Hi, > > here's a shot at a new format of the aggregated mails. > > My focus on this draft was: > > - allow dealing with *lots* of results every day more easily > - allow having a graphical overview of ho

[Zope-dev] Draft of new aggregator

2010-11-30 Thread Christian Theune
Hi, here's a shot at a new format of the aggregated mails. My focus on this draft was: - allow dealing with *lots* of results every day more easily - allow having a graphical overview of how broken something is (group builders by prefix) - have a stable sorting so you can quickly pin-point wh