Casey Duncan writes:
> What do you all think of this? Do redirects ever make sense to an xml-rpc
> call?
I do not think so.
If necessary, the call can be wrapped to avoid a redirect.
Dieter
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.z
On Tuesday 03 Sep 2002 3:23 pm, Casey Duncan wrote:
> > For a long long time I have been using a patched xmlrpc module which
> > returns the redirect target as an xmlrpc string in this case.
>
> This is interesting. Do you ever do anything with the redirect value?
Occasionally yes.
I have some
On Tuesday 03 September 2002 03:53 am, Toby Dickenson wrote:
> On Monday 02 Sep 2002 4:30 am, Casey Duncan wrote:
> > What do you all think of this? Do redirects ever make sense to an xml-rpc
> > call?
> >
> > In reading the spec it says (in reference to the response status value):
> >
> > "Unle
On Monday 02 Sep 2002 4:30 am, Casey Duncan wrote:
> What do you all think of this? Do redirects ever make sense to an xml-rpc
> call?
>
> In reading the spec it says (in reference to the response status value):
>
> "Unless there's a lower-level error, always return 200 OK."
>
> Now granted this
What do you all think of this? Do redirects ever make sense to an xml-rpc
call?
In reading the spec it says (in reference to the response status value):
"Unless there's a lower-level error, always return 200 OK."
Now granted this problem stems from calling a ZMI API through xml-rpc, but
for b
