Hi,
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:37:10AM +0200, Christophe Combelles wrote:
Lennart Regebro a écrit :
Microsites, microsites, microsites!
If there are lots of people wanting to set up a bunch of microsites, I
agree it would be better to have them.
However, the site is needed for a long time
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I disagree. Very much. Note that we are not forcing everyone to use this
new site; it is perfectly possible for projects to setup their own site.
And in that case we end up with two sites, one on Zope.org, and it's
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Christophe Combelles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So let's just build a first nice zope.org with subfolders explaining the
different projects because it's important to have just *something*. At
least.
Sure, that's fine. But that's just one page of explanation,
Martins answer doens't seem to have arrived here, so sorry for the
weird quoting:
On 21 Apr 2008, at 11:53 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
Does it really matter whether a microsite lives in
zope.org/projects/zodb or zodb.zope.org?
As mentioned, no.But it's important that it is it's own site, running
Admittedly I ignored this, as these kinds of calls has gone out for
years, and nothing happens. But this time it looks like it actually
*will* happen, which is great. So here is my 2 centimes:
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The rumours are true. :) An
Lennart Regebro a écrit :
Microsites, microsites, microsites!
If there are lots of people wanting to set up a bunch of microsites, I agree it
would be better to have them.
However, the site is needed for a long time and it's been six month since the
new project started and we have just a
On 21 Apr 2008, at 11:53 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
- Projects gives an explanation of how the different Zope
projects fit
together (Zope 2, Zope 3, Grok, CMF, ZODB). Each is then given a
subfolder
that contains a standard structure: A front page that explains the
project
in more detail, Get
I'm thinking about volunteering for the zope2 section, but I already can say
that I'm not an expert on all facets of zope2. However, helping out is the
main concern now so something is better than nothing.
I'm doubting about what to write / have examples for etc., as you can do a
lot of zope3
Hi all,
The rumours are true. :) An effort has been going on for a while to
improve the zope.org experience and thereby help make Zope more
accessible to new users.
I've helped co-ordinate it, but the project has been sanctioned by the
Zope Foundation and driven by people like Martijn,
On Apr 5, 2008, at 17:52 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
Then, we need a champion for each of the sub-projects. These are:
- Zope 3 and the Zope Libraries -- this is the most important one
in
the short term!
- Zope 2
- CMF
- ZODB
I'm volunteering for the CMF.
jens
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To that end, the website is divided up into sections:
- Home gives a quick overview and tries to get people excited
- Get gives download instructions for the impatient
- Taste whets the reader's appetite with some
Hi Martin. I would like to help with Zope 3 but could not commit to
championing the effort as much as I might like to due to time
constraints. I am prepared to write some articles, help with an
introduction, or help review in conjunction with someone leading the
Zope 3 effort. Are any of the
12 matches
Mail list logo
