Hello,
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
> Yes, if you file a feature request on the bug collector, which can
> be found at:
I've put the most recent version of the patch to
http://collector.zope.org/Zope/1472.
cheers,
andreas
___
Zope-Dev maillist
Hello,
Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Maybe, I have a much simpler solution:
>
> Something in ZServer makes all file fields seekable by
> delivering them through some temporary (either a StringIO
> or a temporary file).
>
> Maybe, you could do the same for your requests?
Yes, I could. But tryin
Ames Andreas (MPA/DF) wrote at 2004-8-19 18:04 +0200:
> ...
>Cause of your hint I looked again and realised that I was wrong.
>HTTPRquest's 'BODYFILE' field fails to reset the file before accessing
>it (as in OFS/Image.py the File class does). That could be easily
>fixed. What's worse is that Fil
Hi Dieter, *,
Dieter Maurer wrote:
> The "FieldStorage" must be rebuilt, because it can contain
> file objects. These file objects must be reset as they may
> have been (partially) read in the previous request.
> This prevent reusing the previous "FieldStorage".
As you may have seen in m
Ames Andreas (MPA/DF) wrote at 2004-8-18 17:22 +0200:
>I had a thinko in my previous patch
>(http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2004-August/023630.html)
>which is corrected in the attached version of the patch. Sorry for
>any inconvenience, I might have caused.
I do not think that your patch
Hi,
Andreas Ames wrote:
> next trial. I hope I've got it straight now.
Not quite so (although this may only be nitpicking ;-).
fs_env = environ
should have read
fs_env = environ.copy()
obviously. See attachment.
cheers,
andreas
--- lib.orig/python/ZPublisher/HTTPRequest.py 2004-08-18
Em Qua, 2004-08-18 às 12:22, Ames Andreas (MPA/DF) escreveu:
> [...]
> Questions:
>
> - Is this the right forum/place to send patches to?
This is the right forum to discuss the patches, and to send them for
evaluation if it's a small one, like yours. The best place to actually
send patches to i
Hi,
I had a thinko in my previous patch
(http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2004-August/023630.html)
which is corrected in the attached version of the patch. Sorry for
any inconvenience, I might have caused.
As I'm sort of protocol challenged (thanks to corporate firewall), svn
unfortunatel
