[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RE: [ZODB-Dev] Subversion repository layout

2004-04-27 Thread Martijn Faassen
Kapil Thangavelu wrote: sigh.. debating over what the book says isn't very productive. my conclusions at the end of my previous email, namely that what this layout will accomplish for the zopeorg repository in terms of avoiding renames of checkouts will likely be fairly limited in pratice, still

[Zope-dev] RE: [Zope3-dev] RE: [ZODB-Dev] Subversion repository layout

2004-04-27 Thread Tim Peters
[Kapil Thangavelu] [snip debating over what the book says] sigh.. debating over what the book says isn't very productive. That's for sure wink. my conclusions at the end of my previous email, namely that what this layout will accomplish for the zopeorg repository in terms of avoiding

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RE: [ZODB-Dev] Subversion repository layout

2004-04-27 Thread Kapil Thangavelu
On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 10:27, Martijn Faassen wrote: Kapil Thangavelu wrote: sigh.. debating over what the book says isn't very productive. my conclusions at the end of my previous email, namely that what this layout will accomplish for the zopeorg repository in terms of avoiding

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RE: [ZODB-Dev] Subversion repository layout

2004-04-26 Thread Martijn Faassen
Tim Peters wrote: I read some subversion docs over the weekend, and so am sufficiently prepared to live with the oddities of a standard subversion layout. I think that if you make a non-standard layout, then everyone coming to, or going from, Zope from/to other subversion projects will be forever

[Zope-dev] RE: [Zope3-dev] RE: [ZODB-Dev] Subversion repository layout

2004-04-26 Thread Tim Peters
[Tim Peters] ... IOW, the existing subversion docs cover the standard layout quite well. If we do something unique, I'm afraid it becomes another piece of folklore that will be impossible to guess and difficult to find out about. [Martijn Faassen] I don't know much about subversion, but