Hi Christian
> Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] Re: AW: Heads up: Dependencies!
>
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 12:25:46PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 12, 2008, at 10:01 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> >> Even better: use the documented setuptools keyword[1]
>
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 12:25:46PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
>
> On Apr 12, 2008, at 10:01 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> Even better: use the documented setuptools keyword[1]
>> 'tests_require',
>> and get the testrunner / buildout to use that hook when running tests.
>
> This doesn't address the cen
On Sunday 13 April 2008, Jim Fulton wrote:
> FWIW, I think using test extras is a necessary evil when testing
> dependencies are significant. I wouldn't use it just to avoid a
> dependency on zope.testing, but I would and have used test extras to
> avoid more extensive dependencies.
+1
Reg
On Apr 12, 2008, at 10:01 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
Even better: use the documented setuptools keyword[1]
'tests_require',
and get the testrunner / buildout to use that hook when running tests.
This doesn't address the central point that testing a different
software configuration in testing
On 13.04.2008, at 04:01, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi again
Betreff: [Zope-dev] Heads up: Dependencies!
Hi all
I try to do a cleaup all zope packages and found some wired
dependencies and bad setup. One of this bad things is the f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roger Ineichen wrote:
> Hi again
>
>> Betreff: [Zope-dev] Heads up: Dependencies!
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I try to do a cleaup all zope packages and found some wired
>> dependencies and bad setup. One of this bad things is the following:
>>
>> The zope.du
