On Mon, 10 May 2004 13:21:26 +0100
Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Casey Duncan wrote:
> > No, some very valuable bugs are submitted anonymously. People can be
> > very paranoid (rightly) about their privacy. We do want to encourage
> > bug submissions even if that means more noise.
>
Casey Duncan wrote:
No, some very valuable bugs are submitted anonymously. People can be
very paranoid (rightly) about their privacy. We do want to encourage bug
submissions even if that means more noise.
So on the one hand we say "we rarely care about anonymous bug posts" and on the
other "close
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Casey Duncan wrote:
> On Fri, 07 May 2004 09:56:45 +0100
> Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Tim Peters wrote:
> >
> > > While that *should* be a good example, it isn't: I only knew that
> > > bug existed because someone closed it on Bug Day (and I'm subscribed
On Fri, 07 May 2004 09:56:45 +0100
Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Peters wrote:
>
> > While that *should* be a good example, it isn't: I only knew that
> > bug existed because someone closed it on Bug Day (and I'm subscribed
> > to the Collectors, and read the email they generate
