Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Christophe Combelles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So let's just build a first nice zope.org with subfolders explaining the
different projects because it's important to have just *something*. At
least.
Sure, that's fine. But that's just
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 09:58:02PM +0100, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Christophe Combelles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So let's just build a first nice zope.org with subfolders explaining the
different projects because it's important to have
Maerteijn wrote:
I'm thinking about volunteering for the zope2 section, but I already can say
that I'm not an expert on all facets of zope2. However, helping out is the
main concern now so something is better than nothing.
Absolutely. I don't think you need to be an expert to do a good job. In
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Yeah, I know this is really a me too post, but I think we should err
on the side of conventional for our website. We can't go from
out-of-date boring to cutting edge hip in one giant leap; it won't be
believable.
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Yes. That's the point. It's vanilla Plone (well, one custom content type
for the feature that fronts each section, but it's trivial) with a
simple skin, not the FrankePlone that runs the old site. As a case in
point, Wichert upgraded it from 3.0 to 3.1rc in about ten
Previously Chris Withers wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Yes. That's the point. It's vanilla Plone (well, one custom content type
for the feature that fronts each section, but it's trivial) with a
simple skin, not the FrankePlone that runs the old site. As a case in
point, Wichert upgraded
Chris Withers wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Yes. That's the point. It's vanilla Plone (well, one custom content type
for the feature that fronts each section, but it's trivial) with a
simple skin, not the FrankePlone that runs the old site. As a case in
point, Wichert upgraded it from 3.0 to
Chris Withers wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
[snip]
A few frills here and there are permitted, of course.
Actually, no frills please. They just come back to bite us every damned
time. It looks like we're gonna get lumbered with Plone again but can we
please please please make sure it's
On Apr 7, 2008, at 00:20 , Alexander Limi wrote:
- Try not to be too clever with the Taste/Get and other links.
People actually scan for links that are similar from other projects,
and having to interpret/understand them is confusing.
+1
- The list of companies using Zope includes
Hi there,
Alexander Limi wrote:
[snip]
- Try not to be too clever with the Taste/Get and other links.
People actually scan for links that are similar from other projects, and
having to interpret/understand them is confusing. I would definitely
switch Taste to Examples, and possibly Get to
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Yeah, I know this is really a me too post, but I think we should err
on the side of conventional for our website. We can't go from
out-of-date boring to cutting edge hip in one giant leap; it won't be
believable. Let's stick with what people know from other sites, and
Chris Withers wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Yeah, I know this is really a me too post, but I think we should err
on the side of conventional for our website. We can't go from
out-of-date boring to cutting edge hip in one giant leap; it won't be
believable. Let's stick with what people know
On Sat, 05 Apr 2008 08:52:07 -0700, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now we need people to help contribute content, review the content that's
already there and tie up a few loose ends.
You can see current state of play here: http://zode01.lovelysystems.com.
Awesome! It looks great,
Alexander Limi wrote:
On Sat, 05 Apr 2008 08:52:07 -0700, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now we need people to help contribute content, review the content that's
already there and tie up a few loose ends.
You can see current state of play here: http://zode01.lovelysystems.com.
Paul Carduner wrote:
I'm wondering where the Documentation section is? I'd like to
volunteer for *that* section. By the way, the design looks pretty
nice.
There's one (called Learn) for each project, i.e. zope 2, zope 3, cmf,
zodb.
Which one would you like to contribute to?
Martin
--
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Carduner wrote:
I'm wondering where the Documentation section is? I'd like to
volunteer for *that* section. By the way, the design looks pretty
nice.
There's one (called Learn) for each project, i.e. zope
Paul Carduner wrote:
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Carduner wrote:
I'm wondering where the Documentation section is? I'd like to
volunteer for *that* section. By the way, the design looks pretty
nice.
There's one (called Learn) for each
On Apr 5, 2008, at 12:11 PM, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's no content that isn't visible to anonymous on the site.
Basically, we originally thought we would have one
documentation/learn section for all Zope technologies. However, it
seemed to make more sense to have a
Paul Carduner wrote:
On Apr 5, 2008, at 12:11 PM, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's no content that isn't visible to anonymous on the site.
Basically, we originally thought we would have one
documentation/learn section for all Zope technologies. However, it
seemed to make more
Look at Sphinx for providing brilliant access to ReST doc.
http://sphinx.pocoo.org/
doing no more than adding a
.. module:: modname
directive to a ReST file causes it to be converted to html, latex or pdf
indexed and searchable.
placing
modname
in the
.. toctree::
directive creates the proper
Kent Tenney wrote:
Look at Sphinx for providing brilliant access to ReST doc.
http://sphinx.pocoo.org/
I think looking at Sphinx is definitely a worthwhile effort. That said,
I agree with Martin that we shouldn't let the new website effort be held
up by (or distracted by) technological
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Kent Tenney wrote:
Look at Sphinx for providing brilliant access to ReST doc.
http://sphinx.pocoo.org/
I think looking at Sphinx is definitely a worthwhile effort. That said,
I agree with Martin that we shouldn't let the new website effort be held
up by (or distracted
22 matches
Mail list logo