[Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/branches/2.10/ Collector #2307: ObjectCopiedEvent not dispatched to sublocations.

2007-06-20 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Stefan H. Holek wrote: Log message for revision 76597: Collector #2307: ObjectCopiedEvent not dispatched to sublocations. ... @@ -130,7 +131,15 @@ if OFS.interfaces.IObjectManager.providedBy(ob): dispatchToSublocations(ob, event) [EMAIL PROTECTED](OFS.interfaces.IItem,

[Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/branches/2.10/ Collector #2307: ObjectCopiedEvent not dispatched to sublocations.

2007-06-20 Thread Stefan H. Holek
I took my cues from how ObjectModifiedEvent is handled. I figured copied and moved should be treated the same. Also, there is this comment in OFS/subscribers.py: # The following subscribers should really be defined in ZCML # but we don't have enough control over subscriber ordering for #

[Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/branches/2.10/ Collector #2307: ObjectCopiedEvent not dispatched to sublocations.

2007-06-20 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
On 20 Jun 2007, at 13:16 , Stefan H. Holek wrote: I took my cues from how ObjectModifiedEvent is handled. I figured copied and moved should be treated the same. Also, there is this comment in OFS/subscribers.py: # The following subscribers should really be defined in ZCML # but we don't

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/branches/2.10/ Collector #2307: ObjectCopiedEvent not dispatched to sublocations.

2007-06-20 Thread Stefan H. Holek
This should of course have read: I took my cues from how *ObjectMovedEvent* is handled. On 20. Jun 2007, at 13:16, Stefan H. Holek wrote: I took my cues from how ObjectModifiedEvent is handled. I figured copied and moved should be treated the same. Also, there is this comment in