[Zope-dev] Re: ZClassNG and ProductNG proposal

2007-04-26 Thread Max M
Andreas Jung skrev: He's trying to reinvent wheels? Reads a bit like GrokNG :-) And reinventing the wheel is bad? I believe that pirelli or firestone has a larger market than Zope. And they do nothing but. Besides, my car would suck with stone wheels at 100MPH. Well probably allready at

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: ZClassNG and ProductNG proposal

2007-04-26 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 26. April 2007 14:10:49 +0200 Max M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andreas Jung skrev: He's trying to reinvent wheels? Reads a bit like GrokNG :-) And reinventing the wheel is bad? It depends on *who* is trying to reinvent wheels :-) I just have some feeling about the quality of the new

[Zope-dev] Re: ZClassNG and ProductNG proposal

2007-04-21 Thread Martin Aspeli
Christopher Lozinski wrote: I think I have figured out how to do it. This looks like a ZMI based ZClass, you can define it through the ZMI, you can add instance variables, you can add instance methods, all through the ZMI, but you can change inheritance, because it is really a product

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: ZClassNG and ProductNG proposal

2007-04-21 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 22. April 2007 02:52:58 +0100 Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christopher Lozinski wrote: I think I have figured out how to do it. This looks like a ZMI based ZClass, you can define it through the ZMI, you can add instance variables, you can add instance methods, all through